Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 43))

  • 176 Accesses

Abstract

Gerd Buchdahl was born on 12 August 1914 in Mainz, Germany of liberal Jewish parents. His earliest memory, from 1917, is of lying in a cot in the basement listening to the explosions of English and French bombs, his mother trembling by his side. His father Max, who ran a retail bedding and furniture business, came from Brilon in Westphalia; his mother Emmy (née Bendix) came from Hamlyn. He matriculated from the Realgymnasium Mainz in March 1933, two months after Hitler came to power. Later that year the offer of a job in Berlin, which would have given him business experience prior to running the family firm, was withdrawn because of his race. Consequently, and as it had always been intended he should spend some time abroad, he came to England, where he quickly decided he wanted to stay. He worked for a few months in a downquilt factory before enrolling (May 1934) in a Diploma Course in Structural Engineering and Reinforced Concrete at what is now Brixton Polytechnic. He completed this in 1936, and acted for a time as a “half commission man” with the London stockbroking firm, Cassell and Co. In 1938 the receipt of an alien’s work permit allowed him to begin his career as a civil engineer with H. J. Paton and, later, Mouchel and Partners for whom he designed reinforced concrete structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selective Bibliography

  • ‘Logic and history: An assessment of R. G. Collingwoods Idea of History’ Australian Journal of Philosophy 23 (1948), 94–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘History and methods of science’,University of Melbourne Gazette 6 (1950), 71–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Induction and scientific method’,Mind 60 (1951), 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Science and logic: Some thoughts on Newton’s second law of motion in classical mechanics’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2 (1951), 217–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Inductive process and inductive inference’,Australian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1956), 164–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Science and metaphysics’, in The Nature of Metaphysics, ed. D. F. Pears (London: Macmillan, 1957), 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of Readings in the Philosophy of Science, eds. H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, Mind 66 (1957), 411–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of International Encylopedia of Unified Science, eds. O. Neurath, R. Carnap, and C. Morris, Australian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1957), 60–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Has Collingwood been unfortunate in his critics?’,Australian Journal of Philosophy 36 (1958), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of The Crime of Galileo, Giorgio de Santillana,The Cambridge Review 80 (1958), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Sources of scepticism in atomic theory’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (1959), 120–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The making of modern science’,The Listener 61 (1959), 927–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of History and Philosophy of Science. An Introduction, L. W. H. Hull, The Cambridge Review 81 (1959), 63–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of Patterns of Discovery, N. R. Hanson, Nature 184 (1959), 572–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ‘The natural philosophy’, in The Making of Modem Science, ed. A. R. Hall (Leicester: Leicester Univ. Press, 1960), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Convention, falsification and induction’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 34 (1960), 113–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Philosophy and science’,Cambridge Opinion 19 (1960), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Interpreting science to non-scientists’,The Listener 63 (1960), 1007–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Newton on the nature of light: The history of a controversy’ (review of The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Vol. 1:1661–1675, ed. H. W. Turnbull), The Cambridge Review 81 (1960), 398–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of The Reach of science, Henryk Mehlberg, Mind 69 (1960), 101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of An Introduction to the Logic of the Sciences, R. Harré, Philosophical Books 1 (1960), 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Review of Études Coperniciennes, ed. S. Wedkiewicz, Archives Internationales dHistoire des Sciences 45 (1960), 421 -23.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Image of Newton and Locke in the Age of Reason (London: Sheed and Ward, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The problem of negation’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (1961), 163–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The philosophical basis of physics’,Contemporary Physics 3 (1962), 182–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘History and philosophy of science at Cambridge’,History of Science 1 (1962), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The study of science as vocation and as criticism’,The Cambridge Review 83 (1962), 512–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Models in science’ (review ofForces and Fields, Mary B. Hesse),The Cambridge Review 83 (1962), 41–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Inward nature versus objectivity’ (review of The Edge of Objectivity. An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas, C. C. Gillispie), History of Science 1 (1962), 90–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of Einstein und die Sovietphilosophie. Bk. 1: Die Grundlagen, Die spezielle Relativitätstheorie, S. Müller-Markus, Soviet Studies 13 (1962), 443–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Induction and Necessity in the Philosophy of Aristotle (London: Aquin Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Descartes’ anticipation of a logic of scientific discovery’, in Scientific Change, ed. A. C. Crombie (London: Heinemann, 1963), 399–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The relevance of Descartes’ philosophy for modern philosophy of science’, British Journal for the History of Science 1 (1963), 229–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Minimum principles in science and philosophy during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’,Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of the History of Science (Ithaca, 1962) (Paris: Hermann, 1964) 1, 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Theory construction: The work of Norman Robert Campbell’,Isis 55 (1964), 151–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Causality, causal laws and scientific theory in the philosophy of Kant’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (1965), 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘A revolution in historiography of science’ (review of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas S. Kuhn, and Towards an Historiography of Science, Joseph Agassi), History of Science 4 (1965), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of The Displacement of Concepts, Donald A. Schon, The Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1966), 86–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ‘Semantic sources of the concept of law’,Synthese 17 (1967), 54–74; also in In Memory of Norwood Russell Hanson, eds. R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1967) (= Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3), 272–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The relation between “understanding” and “reason” in the architectonic of Kant’s philosophy’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67 (1967), 209–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘N. R. Campbell’, in Dictionary of Philosophy, ed. Paul Edwards (New York: Macmillan, 1967) 2,13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metaphysics and The Philosophy of Science. The Classical Origins, Descartes to Kant (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The Kantian dynamic of reason with special reference to the place of causality in Kant’s system’, in Kant Studies Today, ed. Lewis White Beck (La Salle IL: Open Court, 1969), 341–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Gravity and intelligibility: Newton to Kant’, in The Methodological Heritage of Newton, eds. Robert E. Butts and John W. Davis (Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1970), 74–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘History of science and criteria of choice’, in Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, ed. Roger H. Steuwer (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1970) (— Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5), 204–29, 239–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘George Berkeley’, inDictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. C. C. Gillispie (New York: Scribner, 1970) 2,16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘History and methodology’ (review of Fact and Theory. An Aspect of Philosophy of Science, W. M. O’Neil) History of Science 9 (1970), 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Inductivistversus deductivist approaches in the philosophy of science’, Monist 55 (1971), 343–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The conception of lawlikeness in Kant’s philosophy of nature’, in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, ed. Lewis White Beck (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974), 128–50; also in Synthese 23 (1971), 24–46; and Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress (University of Rochester, 1970) (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972), 149–71; and as ‘Der Begriff der Gesetzmässigkeit in Kants Philosophie der Naturwissenschaft’, in Zur Kantforschung der Gegenwart, eds. Peter Heintel and Ludwig Nagl (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1981), 90–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Is science cumulative?’,New Edinburgh Review, nr. 13 (1971), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Hegel’s philosophy of nature’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (1972), 257–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Methodological aspects of Kepler’s theory of refraction’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972), 256–98; also inInternationales Kepler-Symposium (Weil der Stadt, 1971), eds. F. Krafft, K. Meyer, and B. Sticker (Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1973), 131–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Hegel’s philosophy of nature’ (reviews of G. W. F. Hegel (1842), Philosophy of Nature, tr. and ed. M. J. Petry, and G. W. F. Hegel (1847), Philosophy of Nature, tr. A. V. Miller), British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (1972), 257–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of Heidegger, Kant and Time, Charles M. Sherover, Isis 63 (1972), 569–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ‘Explanation and gravity’, in Changing Perspectives in the History of Science, eds. Mikulas Teich and Robert Young (London: Heinemann, 1973), 167–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Leading principles and induction: The methodology of Matthias Schleiden’, inFoundations of Scientific Method: The Nineteenth Century, eds. Ronald N. Giere and Richard S. Westfall (Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1973), 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Hegel’s conception of “Begriffsbestimmung” and the philosophy of science’, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Bucharest, 1971), eds. P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Joja, and GR. C. Moisil (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973), 943–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Hegel’s philosophy of nature and the structure of science’,Ratio 15 (1973) 1–27; also in Hegel, ed. Michael Inwood (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Transcendental reduction: A concept for the interpretation of Kant’s critical method’, Kant-Studien (Special Issue) 65 (1974), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Christian Wolff’, in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. C. C. Gillispie (New York: Scribner, 1976) 14,482–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Philosophische Grundlagen einer historischen Bewertung der Wissenschaft’, inWiener Jarbuchßr Philosophie, ed. Erich Heintel (Wien: Braumuller, 1979)12,16–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The interaction between science, philosophy and theology in the thought of Leibniz’, Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 9 (1979), 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Neo-transcendental approaches towards scientific theory appraisal’, inScience, Belief and Behaviour, ed. D. H. Mellor (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The dynamical version of Kant’s transcendental method’, in Acts of the Fifth International Kant-Congress (Mainz, 1981), ed. Gerhard Funke (Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1981) 1.1, 394–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Reduction-realization: A key to the structure of Kant’s thought’, inEssays on Kants Critique of Pure Reason, eds. J. N. Mohanty and Robert W. Shahan (Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press, 1982), 39–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Response to David Bloor’s “Dürkheim and Mauss revisited: Classification and the sociology of knowledge’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13 (1982), 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Styles of scientific thinking’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Using History of Physics in Innovatory Physics Education (Pavia, 1983), eds. F. Bevilacqua and P. J. Kennedy (Pavia: Centro Studie per la Didattica, Univ. di Pavia, and The International Commission on Physics Education, 1983), 106–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Conceptual analysis and scientific theory in Hegel’s philosophy of nature (with special reference to Hegel’s optics)’, in Hegel and the Sciences, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky (Reidel: Dordrecht, 1984) (=Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 64), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Zum Verhältnis von allgemeiner Metaphysik der Natur und besonderer Metaphysischer Naturwissenschaft bei Kant’, in Probleme der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”, ed. Burkhard Tuschling (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984), 97–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Transzendentale Beweisführungen in Kants Philosophie der Wissenschaft’, inBedingungen der Möglichkeit: ‘Transcendental Argumentsund transzendentales Denken, eds. Eva Schaper and Wilhelm Vossenkuhl (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1984), 104–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Kant’s “special metaphysics” and The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’, in Kants Philosophy of Physical Sciences, ed. Robert E. Butts (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986), 127–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Metaphysical and internal realism: The relations between ontology and methodology in Kant’s philosophy of science’, inProceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Salzburg, 1983), eds. Ruth Barcan Marcus et al. (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986), 623–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Stadien der begrifflichen Entwicklung von Atomtheorien’, inBegrijfswandel und Erkenntnisfortschritt in den Erfahrungswissenschaften, eds. Friedrich Rapp and Hans-Werner Schutt (Berlin: TUB-Dokumentation Kongresse und Tagungen, 101–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Philosophy of science: Its historical roots’, in Les relations mutuelles entre la philosophie des sciences et lhistoire des sciences, in Archives de linstitut international des sciences théoriques (Bruxelles: Office International de Librairie, 1987), 39–56; also inEpistemologia 10 (1987), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Inductivist versus deductivist approaches in the philosophy of science as illustrated by some controversies between Whewell and Mill’, in William Whewell: A Composite Portrait, eds. Menachem Fisch and Simon Schaffer (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Realism and realization in a Kantian light’, in Reading Kant: Critique and Transcendental Arguments, eds. Eva Schaper and Wilhelm Vossenkuhl (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988) (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Das Problem des Wissenschaftesrealismus in Kantischer Sicht’, in Tradition und Innovation, ed. Wolfgang Kluxen (Hamburg: Meiner, 1988), 110–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant and the Dynamics of Reason (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988) (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Reductive realism and the problem of affection in Kant’, in An Intimate Relation: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, eds. J. Brown and J. Mittelstrass (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1989) (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woolhouse, R.S. (1988). Gerd Buchdahl: Biographical and Bibliographical. In: Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2997-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2997-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7846-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2997-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics