Abstract
Gerd Buchdahl was born on 12 August 1914 in Mainz, Germany of liberal Jewish parents. His earliest memory, from 1917, is of lying in a cot in the basement listening to the explosions of English and French bombs, his mother trembling by his side. His father Max, who ran a retail bedding and furniture business, came from Brilon in Westphalia; his mother Emmy (née Bendix) came from Hamlyn. He matriculated from the Realgymnasium Mainz in March 1933, two months after Hitler came to power. Later that year the offer of a job in Berlin, which would have given him business experience prior to running the family firm, was withdrawn because of his race. Consequently, and as it had always been intended he should spend some time abroad, he came to England, where he quickly decided he wanted to stay. He worked for a few months in a downquilt factory before enrolling (May 1934) in a Diploma Course in Structural Engineering and Reinforced Concrete at what is now Brixton Polytechnic. He completed this in 1936, and acted for a time as a “half commission man” with the London stockbroking firm, Cassell and Co. In 1938 the receipt of an alien’s work permit allowed him to begin his career as a civil engineer with H. J. Paton and, later, Mouchel and Partners for whom he designed reinforced concrete structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Selective Bibliography
‘Logic and history: An assessment of R. G. Collingwood’s Idea of History’ Australian Journal of Philosophy 23 (1948), 94–113.
‘History and methods of science’,University of Melbourne Gazette 6 (1950), 71–2.
‘Induction and scientific method’,Mind 60 (1951), 16–34.
‘Science and logic: Some thoughts on Newton’s second law of motion in classical mechanics’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2 (1951), 217–35.
‘Inductive process and inductive inference’,Australian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1956), 164–81.
‘Science and metaphysics’, in The Nature of Metaphysics, ed. D. F. Pears (London: Macmillan, 1957), 61–82.
Review of Readings in the Philosophy of Science, eds. H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, Mind 66 (1957), 411–14.
Review of International Encylopedia of Unified Science, eds. O. Neurath, R. Carnap, and C. Morris, Australian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1957), 60–7.
‘Has Collingwood been unfortunate in his critics?’,Australian Journal of Philosophy 36 (1958), 95–108.
Review of The Crime of Galileo, Giorgio de Santillana,The Cambridge Review 80 (1958), 47.
‘Sources of scepticism in atomic theory’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (1959), 120–34.
‘The making of modern science’,The Listener 61 (1959), 927–9.
Review of History and Philosophy of Science. An Introduction, L. W. H. Hull, The Cambridge Review 81 (1959), 63–5.
Review of Patterns of Discovery, N. R. Hanson, Nature 184 (1959), 572–3.
‘The natural philosophy’, in The Making of Modem Science, ed. A. R. Hall (Leicester: Leicester Univ. Press, 1960), 9–16.
‘Convention, falsification and induction’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 34 (1960), 113–30.
‘Philosophy and science’,Cambridge Opinion 19 (1960), 11–16.
‘Interpreting science to non-scientists’,The Listener 63 (1960), 1007–10.
‘Newton on the nature of light: The history of a controversy’ (review of The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Vol. 1:1661–1675, ed. H. W. Turnbull), The Cambridge Review 81 (1960), 398–401.
Review of The Reach of science, Henryk Mehlberg, Mind 69 (1960), 101–4.
Review of An Introduction to the Logic of the Sciences, R. Harré, Philosophical Books 1 (1960), 5–7.
Review of Études Coperniciennes, ed. S. Wedkiewicz, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 45 (1960), 421 -23.
The Image of Newton and Locke in the Age of Reason (London: Sheed and Ward, 1961).
‘The problem of negation’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (1961), 163–78.
‘The philosophical basis of physics’,Contemporary Physics 3 (1962), 182–94.
‘History and philosophy of science at Cambridge’,History of Science 1 (1962), 1–8.
‘The study of science as vocation and as criticism’,The Cambridge Review 83 (1962), 512–17.
‘Models in science’ (review ofForces and Fields, Mary B. Hesse),The Cambridge Review 83 (1962), 41–2.
‘Inward nature versus objectivity’ (review of The Edge of Objectivity. An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas, C. C. Gillispie), History of Science 1 (1962), 90–5.
Review of Einstein und die Sovietphilosophie. Bk. 1: Die Grundlagen, Die spezielle Relativitätstheorie, S. Müller-Markus, Soviet Studies 13 (1962), 443–6.
Induction and Necessity in the Philosophy of Aristotle (London: Aquin Press, 1963).
‘Descartes’ anticipation of a logic of scientific discovery’, in Scientific Change, ed. A. C. Crombie (London: Heinemann, 1963), 399–417.
‘The relevance of Descartes’ philosophy for modern philosophy of science’, British Journal for the History of Science 1 (1963), 229–49.
‘Minimum principles in science and philosophy during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’,Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of the History of Science (Ithaca, 1962) (Paris: Hermann, 1964) 1, 299–302.
‘Theory construction: The work of Norman Robert Campbell’,Isis 55 (1964), 151–62.
‘Causality, causal laws and scientific theory in the philosophy of Kant’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (1965), 187–208.
‘A revolution in historiography of science’ (review of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas S. Kuhn, and Towards an Historiography of Science, Joseph Agassi), History of Science 4 (1965), 55–69.
Review of The Displacement of Concepts, Donald A. Schon, The Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1966), 86–7.
‘Semantic sources of the concept of law’,Synthese 17 (1967), 54–74; also in In Memory of Norwood Russell Hanson, eds. R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1967) (= Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3), 272–92.
‘The relation between “understanding” and “reason” in the architectonic of Kant’s philosophy’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67 (1967), 209–26.
‘N. R. Campbell’, in Dictionary of Philosophy, ed. Paul Edwards (New York: Macmillan, 1967) 2,13–15.
Metaphysics and The Philosophy of Science. The Classical Origins, Descartes to Kant (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).
‘The Kantian dynamic of reason with special reference to the place of causality in Kant’s system’, in Kant Studies Today, ed. Lewis White Beck (La Salle IL: Open Court, 1969), 341–74.
‘Gravity and intelligibility: Newton to Kant’, in The Methodological Heritage of Newton, eds. Robert E. Butts and John W. Davis (Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1970), 74–102.
‘History of science and criteria of choice’, in Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, ed. Roger H. Steuwer (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1970) (— Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5), 204–29, 239–45.
‘George Berkeley’, inDictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. C. C. Gillispie (New York: Scribner, 1970) 2,16–18.
‘History and methodology’ (review of Fact and Theory. An Aspect of Philosophy of Science, W. M. O’Neil) History of Science 9 (1970), 93–101.
‘Inductivistversus deductivist approaches in the philosophy of science’, Monist 55 (1971), 343–67.
‘The conception of lawlikeness in Kant’s philosophy of nature’, in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, ed. Lewis White Beck (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974), 128–50; also in Synthese 23 (1971), 24–46; and Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress (University of Rochester, 1970) (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972), 149–71; and as ‘Der Begriff der Gesetzmässigkeit in Kants Philosophie der Naturwissenschaft’, in Zur Kantforschung der Gegenwart, eds. Peter Heintel and Ludwig Nagl (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1981), 90–121.
‘Is science cumulative?’,New Edinburgh Review, nr. 13 (1971), 4–11.
‘Hegel’s philosophy of nature’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (1972), 257–66.
‘Methodological aspects of Kepler’s theory of refraction’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972), 256–98; also inInternationales Kepler-Symposium (Weil der Stadt, 1971), eds. F. Krafft, K. Meyer, and B. Sticker (Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1973), 131–54.
‘Hegel’s philosophy of nature’ (reviews of G. W. F. Hegel (1842), Philosophy of Nature, tr. and ed. M. J. Petry, and G. W. F. Hegel (1847), Philosophy of Nature, tr. A. V. Miller), British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (1972), 257–66.
Review of Heidegger, Kant and Time, Charles M. Sherover, Isis 63 (1972), 569–70.
‘Explanation and gravity’, in Changing Perspectives in the History of Science, eds. Mikulas Teich and Robert Young (London: Heinemann, 1973), 167–203.
‘Leading principles and induction: The methodology of Matthias Schleiden’, inFoundations of Scientific Method: The Nineteenth Century, eds. Ronald N. Giere and Richard S. Westfall (Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1973), 23–52.
‘Hegel’s conception of “Begriffsbestimmung” and the philosophy of science’, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Bucharest, 1971), eds. P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Joja, and GR. C. Moisil (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973), 943–55.
‘Hegel’s philosophy of nature and the structure of science’,Ratio 15 (1973) 1–27; also in Hegel, ed. Michael Inwood (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1985).
‘Transcendental reduction: A concept for the interpretation of Kant’s critical method’, Kant-Studien (Special Issue) 65 (1974), 28–44.
‘Christian Wolff’, in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. C. C. Gillispie (New York: Scribner, 1976) 14,482–4.
‘Philosophische Grundlagen einer historischen Bewertung der Wissenschaft’, inWiener Jarbuchßr Philosophie, ed. Erich Heintel (Wien: Braumuller, 1979)12,16–42.
‘The interaction between science, philosophy and theology in the thought of Leibniz’, Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 9 (1979), 74–83.
‘Neo-transcendental approaches towards scientific theory appraisal’, inScience, Belief and Behaviour, ed. D. H. Mellor (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980), 1–22.
‘The dynamical version of Kant’s transcendental method’, in Acts of the Fifth International Kant-Congress (Mainz, 1981), ed. Gerhard Funke (Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1981) 1.1, 394–406.
‘Reduction-realization: A key to the structure of Kant’s thought’, inEssays on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, eds. J. N. Mohanty and Robert W. Shahan (Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press, 1982), 39–98.
‘Response to David Bloor’s “Dürkheim and Mauss revisited: Classification and the sociology of knowledge’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13 (1982), 299–304.
‘Styles of scientific thinking’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Using History of Physics in Innovatory Physics Education (Pavia, 1983), eds. F. Bevilacqua and P. J. Kennedy (Pavia: Centro Studie per la Didattica, Univ. di Pavia, and The International Commission on Physics Education, 1983), 106–27.
‘Conceptual analysis and scientific theory in Hegel’s philosophy of nature (with special reference to Hegel’s optics)’, in Hegel and the Sciences, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky (Reidel: Dordrecht, 1984) (=Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 64), 13–36.
‘Zum Verhältnis von allgemeiner Metaphysik der Natur und besonderer Metaphysischer Naturwissenschaft bei Kant’, in Probleme der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”, ed. Burkhard Tuschling (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984), 97–142.
‘Transzendentale Beweisführungen in Kants Philosophie der Wissenschaft’, inBedingungen der Möglichkeit: ‘Transcendental Arguments’und transzendentales Denken, eds. Eva Schaper and Wilhelm Vossenkuhl (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1984), 104–14.
‘Kant’s “special metaphysics” and The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’, in Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Sciences, ed. Robert E. Butts (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986), 127–62.
‘Metaphysical and internal realism: The relations between ontology and methodology in Kant’s philosophy of science’, inProceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Salzburg, 1983), eds. Ruth Barcan Marcus et al. (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986), 623–41.
‘Stadien der begrifflichen Entwicklung von Atomtheorien’, inBegrijfswandel und Erkenntnisfortschritt in den Erfahrungswissenschaften, eds. Friedrich Rapp and Hans-Werner Schutt (Berlin: TUB-Dokumentation Kongresse und Tagungen, 101–30.
‘Philosophy of science: Its historical roots’, in Les relations mutuelles entre la philosophie des sciences et l’histoire des sciences, in Archives de l’institut international des sciences théoriques (Bruxelles: Office International de Librairie, 1987), 39–56; also inEpistemologia 10 (1987), 39–56.
‘Inductivist versus deductivist approaches in the philosophy of science as illustrated by some controversies between Whewell and Mill’, in William Whewell: A Composite Portrait, eds. Menachem Fisch and Simon Schaffer (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, (forthcoming).
‘Realism and realization in a Kantian light’, in Reading Kant: Critique and Transcendental Arguments, eds. Eva Schaper and Wilhelm Vossenkuhl (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988) (forthcoming).
‘Das Problem des Wissenschaftesrealismus in Kantischer Sicht’, in Tradition und Innovation, ed. Wolfgang Kluxen (Hamburg: Meiner, 1988), 110–34.
Kant and the Dynamics of Reason (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988) (forthcoming).
‘Reductive realism and the problem of affection in Kant’, in An Intimate Relation: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, eds. J. Brown and J. Mittelstrass (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1989) (forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woolhouse, R.S. (1988). Gerd Buchdahl: Biographical and Bibliographical. In: Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2997-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2997-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7846-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2997-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive