Abstract
Much of Professor Elster’s recent work has been devoted to an exploration of the nature and limits of rationality. He has convincingly argued that specifically human behavior, both individual and collective, cannot be satisfactorily explained either in terms of pure (physical) causality or in functional terms. The most typical cases of human behavior require, for their understanding, a special kind of explanation, “intentional explanation.” In his contribution to this volume, Elster proposes an analysis both of this genus and of its most important species, namely “rational-choice explanation.” In so doing, he also pursues another strand of his earlier work, namely the criticism of models of rationality that are exclusively based on the notion of optimality. He has proposed instead a notion of “satisficing” as a better foundation for a general account of rationality. Though this notion is not employed in the paper under discussion, the criticism of optimality here summarized unmistakenly points toward it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Apostel, Leo, 1981. “Semantics and Syntax of Action Theory,” Manuscrito 4 (2): 133–158.
Dascal, Marcelo, 1983. Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Mind, Vol. I, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Dascal, Marcelo, 1984. “Philosophy, Common Sense, and Science,” in: Philosophical Analysis in Latin America, ed. J. Gracia et al., Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 285–312.
Dascal, Marcelo, 1985. “What Should I Ask Her?” in: Philosophy of Mind — Philosophy of Psychology, Proceedings of the Ninth International Wittgenstein Symposium, August 1984, Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, pp. 571–576
Dascal, Marcelo, 1986. Leibniz — Language, Signs and Thoughts, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dascal, Marcelo and Asher Idan, forthcoming. “From Individual to Collective Action,” in: Festschrift for Leo Apostel.
Davidson, Donald, 1963. “Actions, Reasons and Causes,” Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.
Davidson, Donald, 1973a. “Freedom to Act,” in: Essays on Freedom of Action, ed. T. Honderich, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Davidson, Donald, 1973b. “Radical Interpretation,” Dialectica 27: 313–328.
Davidson, Donald, 1975. “Thought and Talk,” in: Mind and Language, ed. S. Guttenplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7–24.
Dretske, Fred I., 1972. “Contrastive Statements,” The Philosophical Review 81: 411–437.
Dretske, Fred I., 1981. “The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge,” Philosophical Studies 40: 363–378.
Elster, Jon, 1975. Leibniz et la formation de l’esprit capitaliste, Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.
Elster, Jon, 1983a. Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon, 1983b. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon, 1985. Making Sense of Marx, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, Alvin I., 1970. A Theory of Human Action, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grice, H.P., 1975. “Logic and Conversation,” in: Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. P. Cole and J. Morgan, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.
Grice, H.P., 1978. “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation,” in: Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. P. Cole, New York: Academic Press, pp. 121–128.
Kim, Jaegwon, 1979. “Causation, Emphasis and Events,” in: Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, ed. P.A. French et al., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 379–382.
Lewis, David, 1974. “Radical Interpretation,” Synthese 27 (3/4): 331–344.
Searle, John R., 1981. “The Intentionality of Intention and Action,” Manuscrito 4(2): 7–102.
Searle, John R., 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stich, Stephen P., 1978. “Autonomous Psychology and the Belief Desire Thesis,” The Monist 61(4): 573–590.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dascal, M. (1988). Rational-Choice Explanation: The Limits to Grounding. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. (eds) Science in Reflection. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 110. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2713-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2957-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive