Abstract
In September 1927, in observance of the centennial of Volta’s death and the scientific pretensions of the Fascist state, the world’s leading physicists gathered in Como, Italy. Among the speakers they heard was Niels Bohr, who said in his almost inaudible manner that the quantum mechanics built in the previous few years announced a revolution in human thought.1 He called his version of the revolution “complementarity.” Known now as the Copenhagen interpretation, it spread quickly among physicists, most of whom accepted it without troubling to understand it, and among philosophers attracted by the subject and by invigorating disputes between Bohr and Einstein about the foundations of physics. Excellent and comprehensive analyses of the technical points at issue have been given by historians and philosophers.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Max Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966, pp. 351–356.
E.g., Max Jammer, The philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, New York: Wiley, 1974.
Cf. Bohr, “Discussion with Einstein,”in: Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. P. A. Schilpp, Evanston, III.: Library of Living Philosophers, 1949, pp. 201–241, on 218–221; Jammer (note 2), pp. 95–96.
Institut international de physique Solvay, Electrons et photons; Rapports et discussions du cinquième conseil de physique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1928, esp. pp. 248–250 (Lorentz), 250–251 (Born), 253–256 (Einstein), 256 (Pauli), 259–263 (Dirac), 264–265 (Heisenberg), 288 (Schrödinger).
Heisenberg, “Die Entwicklung der Quantentheorie, 1918–1928” Nwn 17 (1929)
“Wandlungen der Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaft in jüngster Zeit,” Nwn 22 (1934): 669–675, on 670; and “Undviklingen af kvanteteoriens principielle grundlag efter 1925,” Fysisk tidsskrift 33 (1935): 96–101, on 99.
Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1930, p. x.
Rosenfeld, “Le dualisme entre ondes et particules,” Archeion 19 (1937): 74–77
cf. Rosenfeld, “The Evolution of the Idea of Causality” [1942], in: Rosenfeld, Selected Papers, ed. R.S. Cohen and J. J. Stachel, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, pp. 446–464, on 455.
Jordan, Anschauliche Quantentheorie. Eine Einführung in die moderne Auffassung der Quantenerscheinungen, Berlin: Springer, 1936, p. 117
Heisenberg (note 14), p. 58; Jordan,Physics of the 20th Century, New York: Philosophical Library, 1944, pp. 127–128.
Heisenberg, “Zur Geschichte der physikalischen Naturerklärung,” Akademie der Wissenschaften, Leipzig, Physikalische Berichte, 1933, pp. 29–40, on 39
Cf. Jordan, “Quantenphysikalische Bemerkungen zur Biologie und Psychologie,” Erkenntnis 4 (1934): 215–252
Dirac, “The Early Years of Relativity,” in:Albert Einstein, Historical and Cultural Perspectives, ed. Gerald Holton and Yehuda Elkana, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982, pp. 79–90
Cf. F.. Lindemann, The Physical Significance of the Quantum Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932, p. 33.
Cf. E. C. Kemble, The Fundamental Principles of Quantum Mechanics, New York/ London: McGraw-Hill, 1937, p. 5n
Sommerfeld, Atombau und Spektrallinien, Wellenmechanischer Ergänzungsband, Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1929, pp. v, 299–301
Rosenfeld, “Niels Bohr in the Thirties: Consolidation and Extension of the Conception of Complementarity,” in: Niels Bohr. His Life and Work as Seen by his Friends and Colleagues, ed. Stefan Rozental, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1968, pp. 114–136
A. Pais, “Einstein on Particles, Fields, and the Quantum Theory,” in: Some Strangeness in the Proportion, ed. Harry Woolf, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1980, pp. 197–251.
Bohr, “Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality,” Nature 136 (1935): 65.
cf. V. F. Lenzen, “The Interaction of Subject and Object in Observation,” Erkenntnis 6 (1936): 326–333.
Frank, “Philosophische Deutungen und Misdeutungen der Quantentheorie,” Erkenntnis 6 (1936): 303–317.
Jordan, “Quantenmechanik und die Grundprobleme der Biologie und Psychologie,” Nwn 20 (1932): 815–821, on 815, 818 (quote)
Planck, “Naturwissenschaft und reale Aussenwelt,” Nwn 28 (1940): 778–779
Heisenberg, “P. Jordan, Anschauliche Quantentheorie,” Nwn 24(1936): 558–559
Cf. Heisenberg, “Wandlungen” (note 13), and Physics and Philosophy. The Revolution in Modern Science, New York: Harper and Row, 1958, pp. 105–106, 155.
Cf. Rosenfeld (note 37), p. 134, and Robert Olby, The Path to the Double Helix, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974, pp. 225–235.
Jordan, “Die Verstärkertheorie der Organismen in ihrem gegenwärtigen Stand,” Nwn 26 (1938): 537–545, 537–538, 545 (quote)
Bunning, “Sind die Organismen mikrophysikalische Systeme?” Erkenntnis 5 (1935): 337–347.
Neurath, “Jordan, Quantentheorie und Willensfreiheit,” Erkenntnis 5 (1935): 179–181.
Frank, “Zeigt sich in der modernen Physik ein Zug zu einer spiritualistischen Auffassung?” Erkenntnis 5 (1935): 65–80, on 66–67, 75
Schlick, “Ergänzende Bemerkungen über P. Jordans Versuch einer quantentheoretischen Deutung der Lebenserscheinungen,” Erkenntnis 5 (1935): 181–183.
Bohr, “Kausalität und Komplementarität,” Erkenntnis 6 (1936): 293–303, on 293, 297, 301–302, and Bohr (note 7), pp. 23–26.
Jordan, “Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Theory,” Nature 119 (1927): 566–569, on 567; Physik (note 66), pp. 94–95; Physics (note 18), p. 113; Jordan (note 23), 242, 246.
Laue, “Materie und Raumerfüllung,” Scientia 54 (1933): 402–412, on 412.
Jordan, Physikalisches Denken in der neuen Zeit, Berlin, 1935, pp. 47–52
Cf. Alan D. Beyerchen, Scientists under Hitler, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1977, pp. 123–167
Alexander Vucinich, “Soviet Physicists and Philosophers in the 1930s: Dynamics of a Conflict,” Isis 71 (1980): 236–250
Bavink, “Die Naturwissenschaften im Dritten Reich,” Unsere Welt 25 (1933): 225–236, on 233
Cf. Lewis S. Feuer, Einstein and the Generations of Science, New York: Basic Books, 1974, pp. 109–175
Daniel Serwer, “Unmechanischer Zwang: Pauli, Heisenberg, and the Rejection of the Mechanical Atom, 1923–1925,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 8 (1977): 189–256.
Cf. Joan Bromberg, “The Impact of the Neutron: Bohr and Heisenberg,”Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3 (1971): 307–341
David C. Cassidy, “Cosmic-Ray Showers, High Energy Physics, and Quantum Field Theories: Programmatic Interactions in the 1930s,” ibid., 12 (1981): 1–39, esp. 8–11.
Jordan, Verdrängung und Komplementarität, Hamburg: Stromverlag, 1948, pp. 9–10.
Heisenberg, Across the Frontiers, New York: Harper and Row, 1974, p. 35.
Jung, Psychology and Alchemy, in Jung, Collected Works (20 vols.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953–1979, Vol. 12, pp. 39–223, on 42, 46, 106.
Marie-Louise Franz, Number and Time: Reflections Leading toward a Unification of Depth Psychology and Physics, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974, p. 5.
Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928, p. 350.
William Osborne Greenwood, Biology and Christian Belief, New York: Macmillan, 1939, p. 28.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heilbron, J.L. (1988). The Earliest Missionaries of the Copenhagen Spirit. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. (eds) Science in Reflection. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 110. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2713-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2957-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive