Abstract
The contents of the original paper by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen is reproposed, together with the conceptual experiment conceived by them and with the almost immediate reply by Bohr. It is pointed out that the central issue of the discussion lay3 in the philosophic standpoint which divides realism and positivism. The subject brought forward by Einstein is disconcerting. Difficulties disappear, according to Bohr, provided we give up the idea of describing the properties of microscopic objects regardless of the experimental equipment used for taking measurements on them. Looking at the paper of EPR and to the reply by Bohr, it is inferred that the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in the Copenhagen interpretation is a phenomenological theory and that for the physicists of the time it was possible to think of a broader fundamental theory capable of reaching the same predictive results of traditional quantum mechanics. Perhaps this statement can be made also nowday. However, the hoped broader theory cannot be reproposed in terms of classical mechanics or of classical categories and concepts; somehow, it will be necessary to take into account a microscopic reality definitely unrepresentable in intuitive space time terms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A.Einstein, B.Podolsky, and N.Rosen, Phys. Rev. 41, 777 (1935).
Vol.1 (Hermann, Paris, 1964), p.359.
N.Bohr, Nature 136 ,65 (1935).
N.Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48 ,696 (1935).
B. d’Espagnat, Conceptions de la physique contemporaine (Hermann, Paris, 1965) .
M.Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (John Wiley, New York, 1974) .
Zanichelli, Bologna, 1928), p. 565.
Hamlet, I. IV.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carazza, B. (1988). Historical Considerations on the Conceptual Experiment by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. In: Tarozzi, G., van der Merwe, A. (eds) The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2947-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2947-0_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7826-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2947-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive