Skip to main content

Historical Considerations on the Conceptual Experiment by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

  • Chapter
  • 231 Accesses

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 28))

Abstract

The contents of the original paper by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen is reproposed, together with the conceptual experiment conceived by them and with the almost immediate reply by Bohr. It is pointed out that the central issue of the discussion lay3 in the philosophic standpoint which divides realism and positivism. The subject brought forward by Einstein is disconcerting. Difficulties disappear, according to Bohr, provided we give up the idea of describing the properties of microscopic objects regardless of the experimental equipment used for taking measurements on them. Looking at the paper of EPR and to the reply by Bohr, it is inferred that the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in the Copenhagen interpretation is a phenomenological theory and that for the physicists of the time it was possible to think of a broader fundamental theory capable of reaching the same predictive results of traditional quantum mechanics. Perhaps this statement can be made also nowday. However, the hoped broader theory cannot be reproposed in terms of classical mechanics or of classical categories and concepts; somehow, it will be necessary to take into account a microscopic reality definitely unrepresentable in intuitive space time terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.Einstein, B.Podolsky, and N.Rosen, Phys. Rev. 41, 777 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vol.1 (Hermann, Paris, 1964), p.359.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N.Bohr, Nature 136 ,65 (1935).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. N.Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48 ,696 (1935).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. B. d’Espagnat, Conceptions de la physique contemporaine (Hermann, Paris, 1965) .

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (John Wiley, New York, 1974) .

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zanichelli, Bologna, 1928), p. 565.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamlet, I. IV.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carazza, B. (1988). Historical Considerations on the Conceptual Experiment by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. In: Tarozzi, G., van der Merwe, A. (eds) The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2947-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2947-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7826-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2947-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics