Skip to main content

Knowledge and Certainty

  • Chapter
The Likelihood of Knowledge

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 38))

  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

Are any of us ever certain of anything? In one sense, we clearly are. Being certain often means nothing more than having a confident belief, and there is no question that we are often confident about what we believe. This is a very weak and uninteresting sense of certainty, however, and not the one philosophers have usually had in mind when they asked whether we are ever certain. This stronger, philosopher’s sense is often referred to as ‘absolute certainty’. Unfortunately, it is not very clear what this term means or even, I think, whether ‘certainty’ is ever used in this sense in ordinary language. Ordinary speakers might use the term in the weaker sense to mean firm belief while the stronger sense is a technical notion of philosophers. Since one of the issues I wish to deal with here is whether philosophers have been correct in claiming that we are sometimes absolutely certain (a doctrine I will call ‘infallibilism’), we must attempt to clarify the philosopher’s use of the term. The question whether this is also the ordinary sense of ‘certain’ can be left to one side. How then might we clarify ‘absolute certainty’?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. It is doubtful that this would help to convince others, especially a skeptic. To convince them, we might offer a demonstrative argument to show that we have knowledge, appealing to premisses they would accept. This amounts to showing inferentially that we have knowledge and so serves to confirm the putative intuition that we do. In chapter 2, section 3, I will argue that Descartes’ “Cogito, ergo sum” can be understood in this way. See also Wolfson, 1969, I, pp. 174–175, who interprets Spinoza’s ontological argument to be an attempt to confirm what Spinoza took to be an intuition that God exists.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moore (1959b, p. 228): “if I were to assert now ‘It is possible that I am not standing up’ I should naturally be understood to be asserting that I do not know for certain that I am.”

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyers, R.G. (1988). Knowledge and Certainty. In: The Likelihood of Knowledge. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2905-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2905-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7809-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2905-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics