Skip to main content

Science, Psychology, and Human Values in the Context of Dewey’s Critique of Marx

  • Chapter
Context over Foundation

Part of the book series: Sovietica ((SOVA,volume 52))

Abstract

This paper began as a piece of historical research concerning some of the principal themes of Dewey’s critique of Marx. I thought that it would be interesting, since Dewey viewed the world so much in evolutionary terms, to pick out several such critical references over a long span of time. The period that I chose, after reconsidering the chronology of Dewey’s writings, was roughly four decades, beginning in 1898 and ending in 1939; five texts, published at intervals of approximately a decade, presented themselves as especially useful for my purposes. Accordingly, I shall devote the first half of this paper to reproducing what I take to be some of the main points of these Deweyan allusions to Marx and Marxism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. ‘Dewey, Wittgenstein, Quine, Seilars, and Davidson’, in Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1979, p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Dewey, Lectures on Psychological and Political Ethics: 1898, ed. D.F. Koch, New York, Hafner Press, 1976, p. 399.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid. p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Cornelius Castoriadis, Crossroads in the Labyrinth, tr. K. Saper and M.H. Ryle, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1984, esp. pp. 315–20, for a critique of this Marxian notion that casts it in a foundationalist light.

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Dewey and James Tufts, Ethics, New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1908, p. 513.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Dewey and James Tufts, Ethics, New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1908 Ibid. p. 535.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dewey and Tufts, Ethics, revised ed., New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1932, pp. 475–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dewey, The Middle Works, Vol. 11:1918–1919, ed. J.A. Boydston, Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press, 1982, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dewey, The Middle Works, Vol. 12: 1920, ed. J.A. Boydston, Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press, 1982, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dewey, Impressions of Soviet Russia and the Revolutionary World, New York, New Republic, Inc., 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dewey, Individualism Old and New, New York, Minton, Balch & Co., 1930, p. 102–03.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jim Cork, ‘John Dewey, Karl Marx, and Democratic Socialism’, Antioch Review 9(Dec. 1949), p. 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jim Cork, ‘John Dewey, Karl Marx, and Democratic Socialism’, Antioch Review 9(Dec. 1949)Ibid. p. 438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dewey, Freedom and Culture, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1939, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid. p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid. p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid. p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid. p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid. p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V.I. Lenin, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism, New York, International Publishers, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. This qualification, “at a given time”, establishes Leninist Marxism as a version of the historicist-tinged “modest foundationalism” which John Kekes distinguishes from ahistorical “classical foundationalism”. Kekes, a defender of “modest foundationalism” in principle, defines a “worldview” as “the defence of a cluster of ideals guiding policies for coping with the enduring problems of a particular society at a particular time”, considers Marxism to be one such world-view, and contends that “Philosophy is the construction and justification of worldviews.” — Kekes, ’Philosophy, Historicism, and Foundationalism’, Philosophy 13, 3–4(Oct. 1983), p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sidney Hook, From Hegel to Marx, with new introduction, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 1962, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dewey, Freedom and Culture, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. I, tr. S. Moore and E. Aveling, Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Michel Henry, Marx, tr. K. McLaughlin, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Louis Dupré, Marx’s Social Critique of Culture, New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McBride, W.L. (1988). Science, Psychology, and Human Values in the Context of Dewey’s Critique of Marx. In: Gavin, W.J. (eds) Context over Foundation. Sovietica, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2903-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2903-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7808-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2903-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics