Abstract
Lukács’ History and Class Consciousness contains one of the most important discussions of organizational questions to emerge from the tumultuous period immediately following World War I. Unfortunately, Lukács’ contribution is little studied or discussed today and widely misunderstood by contemporary Marxists. Typically, he is viewed as a proto-Stalinist by critical theorists in Germany and America, and as a romantic irrationalist by many Marxists in France and Italy. Michael Löwy’s careful study of Lukács’ position in its historical context shows that neither of these interpretations is correct. Löwy argues convincingly that Lukács has something original to offer and that his theory has not yet been entirely exhausted by history.1 The purpose of this paper is to reconstruct Lukács’ position as it grows out of his evaluation of the work of Luxemburg and Lenin, and then to consider the adequacy of the Lukácsian theory of organization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For examples, see James Miller, ‘Marxism and Subjectivity’, in Telos, no. 6, Fall 1970
Louis Althusser, et al., Lire le Capital, Paris, Maspéro, 1967, tome II, p. 104
Cf. M. Löwy, Pour une sociologie des intellectuels révolutionaires, Paris, PUF, 1976, pp. 203–225
Another book which helps to correct the image of the early Lukács is Laura Boella, Il Giovane Lukács, Bari, De Donate, 1977.
G. Lukács, History and Class Consciousness, translated by R. Livingstone, Boston, MIT, 1968. p. 338. This text will be referred to hereafter as HCC.
HCC, p. 297.
HCC, p. 307.
HCC, p. 297.
HCC, p. xlii.
HCC, p. 41.
HCC, p. 41.
HCC, p. 297.
HCC, p. 298.
HCC, p. 298.
G. Lukács, Lenin, trans. by N. Jacobs, London, New Left Books, 1970, pp. 67–68.
HCC, p. 2.
K. Marx, Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, New York, Doubleday, 1967, p. 350.
Letter from Marx to Ruge (Sept. 1843), quoted in HCC, p. 77.
K. Marx, op. cit., p. 355.
K. Marx, Early Writings, London, C.A. Watts, 1963, pp. 53–54.
K. Marx, The Poverty of Philosophy, New York, International Publishers, 1963, p. 173.
K. Marx, Capital, New York, Modern Library, 1906 reprint, vol. 1, p. 20.
HCC, p. 16.
R. Luxemburg, ‘The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions’, in Rosa Luxemburg Speaks, New York, Pathfinder, 1970.
Ibid. p. 199.
HCC, p. 205.
HCC, p. 299.
HCC, p. 42.
HCC, pp. 41–42.
HCC, p. 303.
HCC, pp. 278–279.
HCC, p. 275.
R. Luxemburg, op. cit., p. 119.
HCC, p. 287.
HCC, p. 285.
HCC, p. 284.
R. Luxemburg, op. cit., p. 129.
HCC, p. 286.
HCC, p. 302.
HCC, p. 299.
R. Luxemburg, op. cit., p. 199.
R. Luxemburg, op. cit., p. 130.
Ibid. p. 121.
L. Trotsky, ‘Les problèmes de la guerre civile’, in Initiative Socialiste, no. 17, Juin 1968, pp. 9–10
Cf. also V. Serge, L’An I de la Révolution Russe, Paris, Éditions de Delphes, 1965, p. 96.
V.I. Lenin, Essential Works of Lenin, New York, Bantam, 1966, p. 89.
V.I. Lenin, What Is To Be Done?, in Selected Works, New York, International Publishers, 1967, vol. I, p. 130.
Ibid. vol. I, p. 130.
Ibid. vol. I, p. 130.
Ibid. vol. I, p. 122.
Ibid. vol. I, p. 130.
K. Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, in Marx and Engels, Selected Works, New York, International Publishers, 1969, p. 121.
Lenin, op. cit., vol. I, p. 121.
G. Lukács, ‘Spontaneität der Massen, Aktivität der Partei’, in Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein, Neuwied und Berlin, Luchterhand, 1968, p. 136 (my translation A.F.)
Ibid. p. 137.
Ibid. p. 141.
G. Lukács, Lenin, op. cit., p. 26.
HCC, p. 304.
HCC, pp. 310–311.
HCC, p. 310.
HCC, pp. 69–70.
For a further discussion of Lukács’ theory of class consciousness and the Party, see A. Feenberg, Lukács, Marx and the Sources of Critical Theory, New York, Oxford University Press, 1985, Chap. V.
K. Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, op. cit., p. 121.
HCC, p. 326.
HCC, p. 42.
HCC, p. 326.
G. Lukács, Lenin, op. cit., pp. 67–68.
Ibid. p. 86.
Ibid. p. 87.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feenberg, A. (1988). The Question of Organization in the Early Marxist Work of Lukács. In: Rockmore, T. (eds) Lukács Today. Sovietica, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2897-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2897-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7805-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2897-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive