Skip to main content

The Strong Sociology of Knowledge Without Relativism

  • Chapter
  • 183 Accesses

Part of the book series: Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 6))

Abstract

Under the more or less established picture of the discipline, the sociology of knowledge — if you prefer, of received opinion — eschews any form of relativism. It distinguishes between knowledge proper and mere ideology and it seeks only to give a social explanation of the claims made by the latter. At the cost of having to deploy such a controversial distinction, it avoids any suggestion that serious cognitive claims — in particular, those of respectable science — are a function of local context. On the contrary, it suggests that certain claims may enjoy absolute merits, transcendent of their context of origin. [For a contemporary version see Laudan (1977).]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnes, B. (1974) Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1979) ‘Vicissitudes of Belief’, Social Studies of Science 9, 247–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1982) T. S. Kuhn and Social Science, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. and Bloor, D. (1982) ‘Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge’, in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. and Shapin, S. (1979) (eds.) Natural Order, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1981) ‘The Strengths of the Strong Programme’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. (1981) ‘What is TRASP? The Radical Programme as a Methodological Imperative’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 215–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (1981) The Idea of a Critical Theory, Cambridge: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1980) Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977) Progress and Its Problems, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, G. and Pettit, P. (1981) Semantics and Social Science, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (this volume) ‘Does the Sociology of Science Discredit Science?’

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1982) ‘History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions’, History of Science 20, 157–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1981) ‘Interpretative Charity, Durkheim, and the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 231–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pettit, P. (1988). The Strong Sociology of Knowledge Without Relativism. In: Nola, R. (eds) Relativism and Realism in Science. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2877-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2877-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7795-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2877-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics