Abstract
Under the more or less established picture of the discipline, the sociology of knowledge — if you prefer, of received opinion — eschews any form of relativism. It distinguishes between knowledge proper and mere ideology and it seeks only to give a social explanation of the claims made by the latter. At the cost of having to deploy such a controversial distinction, it avoids any suggestion that serious cognitive claims — in particular, those of respectable science — are a function of local context. On the contrary, it suggests that certain claims may enjoy absolute merits, transcendent of their context of origin. [For a contemporary version see Laudan (1977).]
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnes, B. (1974) Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Barnes, B. (1979) ‘Vicissitudes of Belief’, Social Studies of Science 9, 247–63.
Barnes, B. (1982) T. S. Kuhn and Social Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
Barnes, B. and Bloor, D. (1982) ‘Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge’, in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 21–47.
Barnes, B. and Shapin, S. (1979) (eds.) Natural Order, London: Sage Publications.
Bloor, D. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bloor, D. (1981) ‘The Strengths of the Strong Programme’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 199–213.
Collins, H. M. (1981) ‘What is TRASP? The Radical Programme as a Methodological Imperative’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 215–24.
Geuss, R. (1981) The Idea of a Critical Theory, Cambridge: The University Press.
Hesse, M. (1980) Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Brighton: Harvester.
Laudan, L. (1977) Progress and Its Problems, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Macdonald, G. and Pettit, P. (1981) Semantics and Social Science, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Papineau, D. (this volume) ‘Does the Sociology of Science Discredit Science?’
Shapin, S. (1982) ‘History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions’, History of Science 20, 157–211.
Turner, S. (1981) ‘Interpretative Charity, Durkheim, and the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 231–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pettit, P. (1988). The Strong Sociology of Knowledge Without Relativism. In: Nola, R. (eds) Relativism and Realism in Science. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2877-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2877-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7795-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2877-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive