Skip to main content

Empirical Support for the Corpuscular Theory in the Seventeenth Century

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 195))

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the empirical content and experimental foundation of the early seventeenth-century corpuscular hypothesis. Supported by ontological, epistemological, and mathematical arguments, observational and experimental evidence played an important part in creating those patterns of thought that were instrumental in the transformation and, eventually, acceptance of the corpuscular theory of matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In particular Kurd Lasswitz, Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton ,2 vols, (Hamburg/Leipzig 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hélène Metzger, Les doctrines chimiques en France du début du XVIIe à la fin du XVIIIe siècle [1923] (Paris: Blanchard, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. B. Stones, “The Atomic View of Matter in the XVth, XVIth, and XVIIth Centuries,” Isis 10 (1928), 445–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marie Boas, “The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy,” Osiris 10 (1952), 412–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stephen Toulmin and June Goodfield, The Architecture of Matter [1962] (Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 137–200

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ugo Baldini, “Il corpusco-larismo italiano del Seicento: Problemi di metodo e prospettive di ricerca,” in: Ricerche sull’atomismo del Seicento ,Pubblicazioni del ‘Centro di Studi del Pensiero Filosofico del Cinquecento e del Seicento in Relazione ai Problemi della Scienza’ I,9 (Firenze: Nuova Italia, 1977), pp. 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Claudius Berigardus, Circulus Pisanus de veteri et peripatetica philosophia [1643] (Padova 1661), IV.8., pp. 421–422.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel Sennertus, Hypomnemata Physica [1636], in: Danielis Sennerti Opera Omnia ,vol. I (Lyon 1656), pp. 100–172, Hypomnema III. De atomis et mistione 1.1., p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alfred Stückelberger, Antike Atomphysik: Texte zur antiken Atomlehre und ihrer Wiederaufnahme in der Neuzeit (München: Heimeran, 1979), p. 282–285.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walter Charleton, Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana (London 1654), II.4., p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petrus Gassendi, Syntagma philosophicum, in: Petri Gassendi Opera omnia in sex tomos divisa ,Vol. I (Lyon 1658), I.3.5., p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alfred Stückelberger, “Lucretius reviviscens: Von der antiken zur neuzeitlichen Atomphysik,” Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 54 (1972), 1–25, here on p. 19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobus Gaffarellus, Curiositez inouyez, hoc est: Curiositates inauditae [1629] (Hamburg/Amsterdam 1678), pp. 97–99

    Google Scholar 

  14. JLynn Thorndike, History of Magic and Experimental Science ,vol. VII (New York: Columbia University Press, 1958), pp. 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iosephus Quercetanus, Ad veritatem Hermeticae medicinae ... responsio (Paris 1604), pp. 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petrus Gassendi, Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii ,2 vols. (Lyon 1649), I, p. 207

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henry Power, Experimental Philosophy ... in Avouchement and Illustration of the now famous Atomical Hypothesis (London 1664), part I, sig. b2r, c2v-[c3r].

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hans Kangro, “Erklärungswert und Schwierigkeiten der Atomhypothese und ihrer Anwendung auf chemische Probleme in der ersten Hälfte des 17. Jahrhunderts,” Technikgeschichte 35 (1968), 13–36, here p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edward Grant, Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge/London/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Francis Bacon, Sylva Sylvarum, I.34. [1627], in: The Works of Francis Bacon ,ed. by James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath, Vol. II (London 1859), p. 354.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johannes Baptista Morinus, De atomis et vacuo contra Petri Gassendi Philosophiam Epicuream (Paris 1650), p. 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Galileo Galilei, Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche [1638], in: Le Opere di Galileo Galilei ,Edizione Nazionale, vol. VIII (Firenze: Barbera, 1965), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Subow, “Zur Geschichte des Kampfes zwischen dem Atomismus und dem Aristotelismus im 17. Jahrhundert (Minima naturalia und Mixtio),” in: Sowjetische Beiträge zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaft ,ed. by Gerhard Harig (Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1960), pp. 161–191

    Google Scholar 

  24. Norma E. Emerton, The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form ,Cornell History of Science Series (Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press, 1984), esp. pp. 76–105.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Hooykaas, “The Discrimination between ‘natural’ and ‘artificial’ Substances and the Development of Corpuscular Theory,” Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 1 (1948), 640–651

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daniel Sennertus, De consensu et dissensu Galenicorum et Peripateticorum cum Chymicis [1619], in Opera omnia (cit. n. 6), p. 230

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seicento, II: David van Goorle e Daniel Sennert,Giornale critico dell a Filosofia Italiana 45 (1966), 44–63, here on pp. 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Angelus Sala, Anatomia vitrioli [1609], 3rd. ed. (Leyden 1617), pp. 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  29. William Arthur Drumin, The Corpuscular Philosophy of Robert Boyle: Its Establishment and Verification , Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, 1973, esp. pp. 79–83

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robert Boyle, “A Physico-Chymical Essay,” in: Certain Physiological Essays [1661], in: The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle ,ed. by Thomas Birch, vol. I (London 1772), pp. 359–376, here on p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas S. Kuhn, “Robert Boyle and Structural Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century,” Isis 43 (1952), 12–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peter Alexander, Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World (Cambridge/London/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Robert Boyle, About the Excellency and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis [1674, written ca. 1665], in: The Works (cit. n. 46), IV, pp. 67–78, here on p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meinel, C. (1988). Empirical Support for the Corpuscular Theory in the Seventeenth Century. In: Batens, D., Van Bendegem, J.P. (eds) Theory and Experiment. Synthese Library, vol 195. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2875-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2875-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7794-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2875-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics