Advertisement

Reconstructing Science: Discovery and Experiment

  • Thomas Nickles
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 195)

Abstract

Science transforms itself by more or less continuously reworking its previous results and techniques. To miss the dynamical, self-reconstructive nature of scientific work is to miss the extent to which scientific inquiry is a bootstrap affair. I shall call non-reconstructive views of science single-pass or one-pass models of scientific inquiry. Here are some examples of reconstruction.

Keywords

Solar Neutrino Crucial Experiment Auxiliary Assumption Reconstructive View Generative Justification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bogen, J., and Woodward, J. (forthcoming). Saving the Phenomena. Philosophical Review.Google Scholar
  2. Brannigan, A. (1981). The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cushing, J. (1982). Models and Methodologies in Current Theoretical High-Energy Physics. Synthese 50, 5–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cushing, J. (1986). The Importance of Heisenberg’s S-Matrix Program for the Theoretical High-Energy Physics of the 1950’s. Centaurus. In press.Google Scholar
  5. Dorling, J. (1973). Demonstrative Induction. Philosophy of Science ,40, 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Earman, J. & Glymour C. (1980). The Gravitational Red Shift as a Test of General Relativity: History and Analysis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ,11, 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrenfest, P. (1911). Welche Züge der Lichtquantenhypothese spielen in der Theorie der Wärmestrahlung eine wesentliche Rolle? Annalen der Physik ,36, 91–118. Reprinted in Paul Ehrenfest: Collected Scientific Papers , ed., M.J. Klein, pp. 185–212. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co., 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Einstein, A. (1916). Relativity: The Special and General Theory. 15th edition, 1952. New York: Crown Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eliot, T.S. (1943). Little Gidding ,the last of his Four Quartets. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  10. Farley, J. & Geison, G. (1974). Science, Politics and Spontaneous Generation in Nineteenth-Century France: The Pasteur-Pouchet Debate. Bulletin of the History of Medicine , 48, 161–198.Google Scholar
  11. Finocchiaro, M. (1980), Scientific Discoveries as Growth of Understanding: The Case of Newton’s Gravitation. In Nickles, ed. (1980), pp. 235–255.Google Scholar
  12. Franklin, A. (1986). The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galison, P. (1981). Kuhn and the Quantum Controversy (review of Black-Body Theory). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ,32, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galison, P. (1987). Four Histories of Experiment. In Gooding et al. (1987), in press.Google Scholar
  15. Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S., eds. (1987). The Uses of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gooding, D. (1986). How Do Scientists Reach Agreement about Novel Observations? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ,17, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kangro, H. (1976). Early History of Planck’s Radiation Law. New York: Crane, Russak.Google Scholar
  19. Klein, M. (1962). Max Planck and the Beginnings of the Quantum Theory. Archive for History of Exact Sciences ,1, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klein, M. (1970). Paul Ehrenfest: Theoretical Physicist ,Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed., enlarged, 1970. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kuhn, T.S. (1978). Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lakatos, I. (1974). The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ,4, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Medawar, P. (1964). Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent? Saturday Review (August 1), pp. 43–44.Google Scholar
  25. Musgrave, A. (1974). Logical versus Historical Theories of Confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ,25, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newton, I. (1672). A Letter of Mr. Isaac Newton ... Containing his New Theory about Light and Colors. Philosophical Transactions ,6, 3075–3087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nickles, T., ed. (1980). Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality* Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  28. Nickles, T. (1985). Beyond Divorce: Current Status of the Discovery Debate. Philosophy of Science ,52, 177–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nickles, T. (1987a). Lakatosian Heuristics and Epistemic Support. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ,38, in press.Google Scholar
  30. Nickles, T. (1987b). Justification and Experiment. In Gooding et al (1987), in press.Google Scholar
  31. Nickles, T. (1987c). The Reconstruction of Scientific Knowledge. Forthcoming in Philosophy and Social Action.Google Scholar
  32. Nickles, T. (1987d). From Natural Philosophy to Metaphilosophy of Science. In Theoretical Physics in the 100 Years since Kelvin’s Baltimore Lectures ,ed. P. Achinstein & R. Kargon, pp. 507–541. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pinch, T. (1981). The Sun-Set: The Presentation of Certainty in Scientific Life. Social Studies of Science ,11, 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinch, T. (1984). Towards an Analysis of Scientific Observation. Social Studies of Science ,15, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinch, T. (1985). Theory Testing in Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences ,15, 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Polanyi, M. (1962). The Republic of Science. Minerva ,1, 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schaffer, S. (1986). Scientific Discoveries and the End of Natural Philosophy. Social Studies of Science ,16, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spector, M. (1972). Methodological Foundations of Relativistic Mechanics. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  40. Will, F.L. (1981). The Rational Governance of Practice. American Philosophical Quarterly ,18, 191–201.Google Scholar
  41. Worrall, J. (1976). Thomas Young and the ‘Refutation’ of Newtonian Optics ...., In Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences ,C. Howson, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 107–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Worrall, J. (1978). The Ways in which the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Improves on Popper’s Methodology. In Progress and Rationality in Science ,ed. G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson, pp. 45–70. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  43. Worrall, J. (1982). The Pressure of Light: The Strange Case of the Vacillating Crucial Experiment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ,13, 133–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Worrall, J. (1983). Hypotheses and Mr. Newton. Lecture, to be published.Google Scholar
  45. Worrall, J. (1987). The Role of Successful Predictions in Theory Change. In Gooding et al. (1987), in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Nickles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations