Advertisement

Physical Reality and Closed Theories in Werner Heisenberg’s Early Papers

  • Catherine Chevalley
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 195)

Abstract

In his 1934 paper entitled “Transformations of the foundations of natural science”1 Heisenberg stressed the possibility for physical theories to “exhibit a structure different from the structure of classical physics”. This, he said, would happen in the one case when their objects would not be any more “things encountered in a direct and immediate experience”2: to leave this field ruled by classical physics would thus generate a break, a change, a shift in the very structure of the physical theory. The “mimetic” relationship between the objects of the theory and the objects of our world would be lost and would not ensure any more the truth value of the propositions of natural science.

Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Physical Theory Physical Reality Classical Physic Atomic Physic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mara BELLER, “Matrix theory before Schrödinger. Philosophy, problems, consequences”, in Isis ,vol. 74 (1983), 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. T. BERGSTEIN, Quantum theory and ordinary language ,London, Macmillan (1972).Google Scholar
  3. Niels BOHR, Collected Works. Vol. VI: Foundations of Quantum Physics I (1926–1932) ,eds. E. Rüdinger and J. Kalckar, Amsterdam-New York-Oxford-Tokyo, North-Holland Publishing Company (1985).Google Scholar
  4. Catherine CHEVALLEY, “Complémentarité et langage dans 1’inter-prétation de Copenhague”, in Revue d’histoire des sciences ,t. XXXVIII-3/4 (1985), 251–292.Google Scholar
  5. Norwood R. HANSON “The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory”, in American Journal of Physics ,27, I (1959), 1–15. Reprinted in Stephen TOULMIN ed., Physical Reality. Philosophical essays on XXth century Physics ,New York, Harper & Row (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Patrick A. HEELAN, Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity. A study of the physical philosophy of Werner Heisenberg ,La Hague, Martinas Nijhoff (1965)Google Scholar
  7. “Heisenberg and radical theoretical change” in Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschafttheorie ,6 (1975), 113–138.Google Scholar
  8. John L. HEILBRON, “The Genesis of the Bohr Atom”, in Historical Studies in the Physical sciences ,1 (1969) 211–290 (with Thomas S. Kuhn)Google Scholar
  9. Werner HEISENBERG, 1926a “Mehrkörperproblem und Resonanz in der Quantenmechanik”, in Zeitschrift für Physik ,38 (1926), 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 1926b “Quantenmechanik”, in Die Naturwissenschaften ,14 (1926), 899–994. English translation in Arthur I. Miller ed. Source Book in relativity and Quantum Field Theory ,Harvard University Press (to be published in 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 1927a “Ueber den anschaulichen inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik”, in Zeitschrift für Physik ,43 (1927) 172–198. English translation in J.A Wheeler and W.H. Zurek eds. Quantum Theory and Measurement ,Princeton University Press (1983), 62–84. Also in A.I. Miller, op. cit. above. 1927b “La Mécanique des Quanta” (with Max BORN), in Electrons et Photons, Rapports et discussions du cinquième conseil Sol vay ,Paris, Gauthier-Villars (1928).Google Scholar
  12. 1931 “Die Rolle der Unbestimmtheitsrelationen in der modernen Physik”, in Monatsheft für Mathematik und Physik ,Leipzig, 38 (1931), 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 1933 Zur Geschichte der physikalischen Naturerklärung, in Physikalische Berichte 85 (1933), 29–40, Reprinted in (1945).Google Scholar
  14. 1934a “Wandlungen der Grundlagen der exakten Naturwissenschaft in jüngster Zeit”, in Die Naturwissenschaften ,22 (1934), 660–675. Reprinted in (1945).Google Scholar
  15. 1934b “Die Entwicklung der Quantenmechanik”, in W. Heisenberg, E. Schrödinger, P.A.M. Dirac, Die moderne Atomtheorie. Die bei der Entgegennahme des Nobelpreises 1933 in Stockholm gehaltenen Vorträge ,Leipzig, S. Hirzel, (1934), 1–18.Google Scholar
  16. 1936 “Prinzipielle Fragen der modernen Physik”, in Unsere Welt 28 (1936) 97–102. Reprinted in (1945).Google Scholar
  17. 1937 “Gedanken der antiken Naturphilosophie in der modernen Physik”, in Die Antike. Zeitschrift für Kunst und Kultur des klassischen Altertums ,13 (1937), 118–124. Reprinted in (1945)Google Scholar
  18. 1941 “Goethesche und Newtonsche Farbenlehre im Lichter der modernen Physik” in Geist der Zeit 19 (1941), 261–275. Reprinted in (1945).Google Scholar
  19. 1936 1942 “Die Einheit des naturwissenschaftlichen Weltbildes”, in Leipziger Universitätsreden ,8. Reprinted in (1945).Google Scholar
  20. 1945 Wandlungen in den Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaft ,Leipzig, S. Hirzel. (same as the 1942 edition, but easier to find).Google Scholar
  21. 1948 “Der Begriff ‘Abgeschlossene Theorie’ in der modernen Naturwissenschaft”, in Dialectica ,2 (1948), 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 1952 Philosophic problems of nuclear science ,New York, Pantheon; London, Faber & Faber. English translation of (1945).Google Scholar
  23. 1955 “The development of the interpretation of quantum theory”, in Niels Bohr and the development of physics. Essays dedicated to Niels Bohr on the occasion of his 70th birthday ,W. Pauli, L. Rosenfeld, V. Weisskopf eds. London, Pergamon, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. 1958a Physics and Philosophy. The revolution in modern science ,New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  25. 1958b “Die Plancksche Entdeckung und die philosophischen Grundfragen der Atomlehre”, in Max Planck-Gesellschaft, Jahrbuch ,26–52, reprinted in (1974).Google Scholar
  26. (1965) Physics 1922–1941 ,Nobel Lectures published for the Nobel Foundation, Amsterdam-London-New York, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. 1972 “Die Richtigheitskriterien der abgeschlossenen Theorien in der Physik”, in Einheit und Vielheit, Festschrift für C.F. von Weizsäcker zum 70 Geburtstag. E. Scheibe and G. Sussmann eds., Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 140–145. English translation in W. Heisenberg, Tradition in Science ,New York, The Seabury Press (1983), 123–129.Google Scholar
  28. 1974 Across the frontiers ,New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  29. 1975 “The Development of concepts in the history of quantum theory”, in American Journal of Physics ,43 (1975), 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 1976 “The nature of elementary particles”, in Physics Today ,29, (1976) 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. John HENDRY, The Creation of Quantum Mechanics and the Bohr-Pauli Dialogue ,Dordrecht, Reidel, 1984.Google Scholar
  32. Herbert HORZ, Werner Heisenberg und die Philosophie ,Berlin, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften (1968).Google Scholar
  33. Max JAMMER, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics ,New York, John Wiley & Sons (1974).Google Scholar
  34. Martin J. KLEIN, Letters on Wave Mechanics. Schrödinger, Planck, Einstein ,Loren tz ,K. Przibram ed. New York, Philosophical Library (1967). Introduction and translation by M.J. Klein.Google Scholar
  35. Gunther LUDWIG, Wave Mechanics ,New York, Pergamon (1968).Google Scholar
  36. Arthur I. MILLER, Imagery in scientific thought. Creating XX-th Century Physics ,Boston, Birkhauser (1984).Google Scholar
  37. Erhard SCHEIBE, The logical analysis of quantum mechanics ,Oxford, New York, Pergamon Press (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Chevalley
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CNRSParisFrance
  2. 2.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations