Skip to main content

Molecular Geometry in 19th-Century France: Shifts in Guiding Assumptions

  • Chapter
Scrutinizing Science

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 193))

  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

The histories of crystallography and mineralogy have been comparatively neglected by historians and philosophers of science. Recently, however, this state of affairs has begun to change with the appearance of a number of books and smaller monographs by historians of science. There is general consensus that the work of the French scientist René-Just Haüy (1743–1822) marked a watershed in the development of these fields. Haüy devised the first comprehensive quantitative model of crystal structure;1 subsequently he turned to mineral classification and developed a system whose basic unit, the species, was dependent upon his theory of crystal structure. With these achievements, crystallography and perhaps mineralogy are considered to have reached scientific maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. René-Just Haüy, Essai d’une théorie sur la structure des crystaux (Paris, 1784).

    Google Scholar 

  2. John G. Burke, Origins of the Science of Crystals (Berkeley, 1966), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norma E. Emerton, The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form (Ithaca, 1984), pp. 284–285. The quotations are taken from an anonymous review of Henry Brooks’s A Familiar Introduction to Crystallography in Annals of Philosophy, 1823.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hildesheim, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2d. edn. (Chicago, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crystals and Compounds (Philadelphia, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 1st edn., 5 vols. (Paris, 1801).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burke, Origins, p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 69, paraphrasing J.-B. Rome de l’Isle, the first scientist to enunciate the law in 1783.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Oldroyd, From Paracelsus to Haüy: The Development of Mineralogy in Its Relation to Chemistry (Ph.D. dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. David Oldroyd, ‘Mineralogy and the “Chemical Revolution”’, Centaurus (1975), 19: 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schütt, Die Entdeckung, pp. 59–60. The only opponents he lists are J.-F. d’Aubuisson and E.-C. Kramp in France, T. Thomson in England and C. S. Weiss in Germany. In another connection, he also cites the chemist C.-L. Berthollet, pp. 98–104. Schütt’s finding is a significant one which merits close scrutiny.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 2d. edn., 5 vols. (Paris, 1822).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 3 vols. (Paris, 1822).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quoted in Mauskopf, Crystals and Compounds, p. 31. Mitscherlich later modified the second part of this law to take into account the chemical nature of the constituents.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid. To the best of my knowledge, Mitscherlich never articulated a theory of crystal structure. But implicit in his formulation of isomorphism and polymorphism was, at the least, a negation of Haüy’s theory of compound molecular structure: no longer could the compound or integrante molecule be envisioned as formed by the juxtaposition of determinately shaped constituent molecules in only one arrangement.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Dufrenoy, Traité de minéralogie, 4 vols. (Paris, 1855–1856), I, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Delafosse, Nouveau cours de minéralogie, 2 vols. (Paris, 1858)

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. de Lapparent, Cours de minéralogie, 3d. edn. (Paris, 1899), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quoted in Mauskopf, Crystals and Compounds, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., Chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., pp. 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., pp. 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delafosse, Nouveau cours, I, p. 513.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Bravais, Études cristallographiques (Paris, 1866), pp. 204–205.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. de Lapparent, ‘Notice nécrologique’, Annales des Mines, 9m ser. (1895) 7:277

    Google Scholar 

  28. In his necrology, G. Wyrouboff wrote of how Mallard “a transformé - je dirais presque revolutionné - la cristallographie”. “François-Ernest Mallard”, Bulletin de la Sociétie Française de Minéralogie (1894), 17: 243.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Mallard, Traité de cristallographie, 2 vols. (Paris, 1879, 1884), I, p. i.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mauskopf, S.H. (1988). Molecular Geometry in 19th-Century France: Shifts in Guiding Assumptions. In: Donovan, A., Laudan, L., Laudan, R. (eds) Scrutinizing Science. Synthese Library, vol 193. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2855-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2855-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7784-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2855-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics