Abstract
Brownian movement (discovered by the botanist Brown in 1827) refers to the irregular motion of small suspended particles in various fluids which keeps them from steadily sinking due to gravitation. Attempts to explain this phenomenon are linked with the atomic debates from the late 19th century to the early 20th. In particular, the testing of the Einstein—Smoluchowski theory of Brownian motion by Perrin1 is considered to have provided the long sought-after evidence in favor of the molecular-kinetic theory of gases against classical thermodynamics. While this episode has often served as a case study for philosophers,2 such case studies, as remarked generally by Laudan et al. (1986, p. 159) “are not ‘tests’ of the theory in question at all, but applications of the theory to a particular case”. The aim of my discussion will be to employ this episode to carry out genuine tests, focusing on the following set of interrelated theses on theory appraisal: (T2.3, T2.4, T2.5, T2.6, T2.8 and T2.10). As many of these pertain to evaluating guiding assumptions, I shall suggest briefly how my results bear on a thesis on the appraisal of guiding assumptions (GA1.1), and a thesis on scientific revolutions (GA4.1). The atomic debate as a whole is too broad to be taken up here.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brush, S. (1968), ‘A History of Random Processes I. Brownian Movement From Brown to Perrin’, Archive for the History of the Exact Sciences 5, 1–36, (as Reprinted in Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, Vol. II (1977), edited by Sir M. Kendall and R. L. Plackett. New York: Macmillan, pp. 347–382; page references are to this reprinting.)
Brush, S. (1968), ‘Mach and Atomism’, Synthese 18, 192–215.
Brown, R. (1828), ‘A Brief Account of Microscopical Observations Made in the Months of June, July and August, 1827, on the Particles Contained in the Pollen of Plants; and on the General Existence of Active Molecules in Organic Bodies’, Philosophical Magazine 4, 161–173.
Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Chandrasekhar, S.: (1943), ‘Stochastic Problems in Physics and Astronomy’, Reviews of Modern Physics 15, 1–89, (as reprinted in Wax (1954), pp. 3–91; page references are to this reprinting.)
Clark, P. (1976), ‘Atomism Versus Thermodynamics’, in C. Howson (ed.), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–105.
Delsaulx, J. (1877), Thermodynamic Origin of the Brownian Motion,’ Monthly Micro-scopical J. 18, 1–7.
Einstein, A. (1926), Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, (edited by R. Furth, translated by A. D. Cowper), London: Methuen (as reprinted in the Dover Edition (1956), New York: Dover Publications; page references are to this reprinting.)
Einstein, A. (1949), ‘Autobiographical Notes’, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (ed. P. A. Schilp). Library of Living Philosophers, Tudor Pub. Co. 1949, reprinted by Harper & Brothers, New York, 1959; the quoted passage is from pp. 46–49, (German with English translation on facing pages.)
Feyerabend, P. (1978), Against Method, London: Redwood Burn.
Gardner, M. (1979), ‘Realism and Instrumentalism in 19th Century Atomism’, Philosophy of Science 46, 1–34.
Giere, R. (1984), ‘Toward a Unified Theory of Science’, in Science and Reality (eds. T. Cushing, C. F. Delaney, and G. Gutting), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 5–31.
Gouy, L. (1888), ‘Note sur le mouvement brownien’, Journal de Physique 7: 561–564.
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, G. H. (1965), ‘Inference to the Best Explanation’, Philosophical Review 74, 88–95.
Jones, B. (1870), The Life and Letters of Faraday, vol. 1, London: Longmans, Green.
Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1977), The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Laudan, L. (1984), Science and Values, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Laudan, L., Donovan A., Laudan, R., Barker, P., Brown, H., Leplin, J., Thagard, P., and Wykstra, S. (1986), ‘Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research’, Synthese 69, 141–223.
Laymon, R. (1978), ‘Feyerabend, Brownian Motion, and the Hiddenness of Refuting Facts’, Philosophy of Science 44, 225–247.
Laymon, R. (1988), ‘The Michelson-Morley Experiment and the Appraisal of Theories’, this volume, pp. 245–266.
Mayo, D. (1986), ‘Cartwright, Causality, and Coincidence’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), Philosophy of Science Association 1986, vol. 1, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 42–58.
Musgrave, A. (1974), ‘Logical versus Historical Theories of Confirmation’, British J. Philosophy of Science 25, 1–23.
Nye, M. J. (1972), Molecular Reality, London: Macdonald.
Ostwald, W. (1907), ‘The Modern Theory of Energetics’, Monist 17, 481–515.
Parzen, E. (1960), Modern Probability Theory and Its Applications, New York: Wiley.
Perrin, J. (1923), Atoms, translated by D. L. Hammick, London: Constable.
Perrin, J. (1950), Oeuvres Scientifiques de Jean Perrin, Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Poincare’, J. (1905), ‘The Principles of Mathematical Physics’, in Congress of Arts and Science, Universal Exposition, St. Louis, 1904: vol. 1, Boston and New York: Houghton, Mifflin, pp. 604–622.
Popper, K. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Books.
Ramsay, W. (1882), ‘On Brownian or Pedetic Motion, Proc. Bristol Naturalists’ Society 3, 299–302.
Salmon, W. C. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Uhlenbeck, G. E. and Ornstein, L. S. (1930), ‘On the Theory of the Brownian Motion’, Physical Review 36, 823–841 (as reprinted in Wax (1954), pp. 93–111.)
Von Mises, R. (1957), Probability, Statistics and Truth, New York: Dover.
Wax, N. (ed.) (1954), Selected Papers On Noise and Stochastic Processes, New York: Dover.
Worrall, J. (1985), ‘Scientific Discovery and Theory-Confirmation’, in J. C. Pitt (ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 301–331.
Zahar, E. (1973), ‘Why Did Einstein’s Programme supersede Lorentz’s? British J. Philosophy of Science 24, 95–123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayo, D.G. (1988). Brownian Motion and the Appraisal of Theories. In: Donovan, A., Laudan, L., Laudan, R. (eds) Scrutinizing Science. Synthese Library, vol 193. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2855-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2855-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7784-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2855-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive