Advertisement

Newton’s Alchemy and His ‘Active Principle’ of Gravitation

  • B. J. T. Dobbs
Chapter
Part of the Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas book series (ARCH, volume 123)

Abstract

During his undergraduate years, probably about 1664, Newton accepted the Cartesian postulate of a dense aether, acting mechanically by impact, as the cause of terrestrial gravitation.1 Manuscripts written during the next twenty years reflect his continuous commitment to some form of mechanical aether as the principle of gravitation, but in those papers Newton sometimes associated the mechanical gravitational aether with the quasi-spiritual “active principle” of alchemy that was responsible for certain non-mechanical natural processes.

Keywords

Active Principle Mechanical Philosophy Loeb Classical Library Ancient Wisdom Divine Mind 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    J.E. McGuire and Martin Tamny, Certain Philosophical Questions: Newton’s Trinity Notebook (Cambridge/London/New York/New Rochelle/Melbourne/Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1983), esp. pp. 362–65, 426–31.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Isaac Newton, “Of Natures obvious laws & processes in vegetation,” Dibner Library of the History of Science and Technology of the Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington, D.C., Dibner Collection MSS 1031 B (written c. 1672); idem, “An Hypothesis explaining the Properties of Light, discoursed of in my severall Papers,” in The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, ed. by H.W. Turnbull, J.P. Scott, A.R. Hall, and Laura Tilling (7 vols.; Cambridge: Published for the Royal Society at the University Press, 1959–77), I, 362–82 (Newton to Oldenberg, 7 Dec. 1675), idem, two different systems in a letter to Boyle, Correspondence, II, 288–96 (Newton to Boyle, 28 Feb. 1678/79); idem, use of gravitational vortices in correspondence with Burnet, Correspondence, II, 319–34 (Newton to Burnet, 24. Dec. 1680; Burnet to Newton, 13 Jan. 1680/81; Newton to Burnet, ? Jan. 1680/81); idem, use of gravitational vortices in correspondence with Flamsteed, Correspondence, II, 340–56, 358–67 (Newton to Crompton for Flamsteed, 28 Feb. 1680/81; Flamsteed to Crompton for Newton, 7 March 1680/81; Newton to [? Crompton] ? April 1681; Newton to Flamsteed, 16 April 1681); idem, reference to the mnaterial fluid of the heavens that carried the planets in their course, in University Library, Cambridge, Add. MS 3964.14, f. 613r, cited in Derek T. Whiteside, “Before the Principia: The Maturing of Newton’s Thoughts on Dynamical Astronomy 1664–1684.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 1 (1970), 5–19, esp. pp 14 and 18, note 42 (dated by Whiteside c. 1682). In the first two of these references the mechanical gravitational aether is most closely associated with the “active (non-mechanical) principle” of alchemy.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cf. B.J.T. Dobbs, “Newton’s Rejection of a Mechanical Aether for Gravitation,” in Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change, ed. by A. Donovan, L. Laudan, and R. Laudan (Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel, in press); idem, “Newton’s Corpus: An Integrated View,” in Proceedings of the Tercentenary Celebrations of the Publication of Newton’s Principia of the University of Maryland and the Smithsonian Institution (in press).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isaac Newton, A Treatise of the System of the World Translated into English, intro. by I. Bernard Cohen (facsimile reprint of the 2nd London ed. of 1731; London: Dawsons of Pall Mall, 1969), “Introduction,” pp. vii-viii; Richard S. Westfall, “Newton’s Theological Manuscripts,” in Contemporary Newtonian Research, ed. by Zev Bechler (Studies in the History of Modern Science, 9; Dordrecht/Boston/London: D. Reidel, 1982), pp. 129–43, esp. p. 137. For a similar version of the same material, see Paolo Casini, “Newton: the Classical Scholia,” History of Science 22 (1984), 1–58, quotation on pp. 1–2. For Newton’s work on the origins of gentile theology, see Richard S. Westfall, “Isaac Newton’s Theologiae Gentilis Origines Philosophiae,” in The Secular Mind. Transformations of Faith in Modern Europe. Essays presented to Franklin L. Baumer, Randolph W. Townsend Professor of History, Yale University, ed. by W. Warren Wagar (New York/London: Holmes & Meier, 1982), 15–34.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newton, System (note 4), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cf. I. Bernard Cohen, “Hypotheses in Newton’s Philosophy,” Physis 8 (1966), 163–84.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    From the Journal of the Royal Society for 4 July 1688, quoted in Bernard Gagnabin, “De la cause de la pesanteur. Mémoire de Nicolas Fatio de Duillier, Présenté à la Royal Society le 26 février 1690. Reconstitué et publié avec une introduction par Bernard Gagnebin, Conservateur des manuscrits à la Bibliothèque publique et universitaire de Genève,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 6 (1949), 105–60, on p. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bibliothèque publique et universitaire de Genève, Papiers Fatio No. 3 (Inv. 526), f. 66, quoted in Gagnebin, “De la cause” (note 8), p. 117.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Bernard Cohen, Introduction to Newton’s ‘Principia’ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), pp. 184–85; Isaac Newton, Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton. A Selection from the Portsmouth Collection in the University Library, Cambridge. Chosen, edited, and translated by A. Rupert Hall and Marie Boas Hall (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1962), pp. 312–17, quotations from pp. 313, 315.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Memoranda by David Gregory, 28 Dec. 1691 (From the original in the Library of the Royal Society of London) in Newton, Correspondence (note 2), III, 191–92.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newton, Unpublished Papers (note 10), pp. 312–17.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGuire and Tamny, Certain Philosophical Questions (note 1), pp. 408–09.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    King’s College, Cambridge, Keynes MS 28, f. 6v. quoted by permission of the Provost and Fellows of King’s College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Isaac Newton, Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World (1729, trans. Andrew Motte), ed. by Florian Cajori (reprint of the 1934 ed.; 2 vols.; Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1962), II, 546; Isaac Newtons Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. The Third Edition (1726) with Variant Readings, assembled and ed. by Alexandre Koyré and I. Bernard Cohen with the assistance of Anne Whitman (2 vols.; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972), II, 764.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    David Gregory,Isaac Newton and Their Circle: Extracts from David Gregory’s Memoranda 1677–1708, ed. by Walter George Hiscock (Oxford: By the University Press for the Author, 1937), p. 30.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edward Grant, Much Ado about Nothing. Theories of space and vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge/London/New York/New Rochelle/Melbourne/Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1981), esp. pp. 182–264.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brian P. Copenhaver, “Jewish Theologies of Space in the Scientific Revolution: Henry More, Joseph Raphson, Isaac Newton and their Predecessors,” Annals of Science 37 (1980), 489–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newton, Principia (note 15), (Motte-Cajori), II, 545; (Koyré-Cohen), II, 762: I Kings 8: 27; Psalms 139: 7–9; Job 22: 12–14; Jeremiah 23: 23–24. For the references to the prior Jewish tradition, see Copenhaver, “Jewish Theologies” (note 18), p. 546, note 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newton, Principia (note 15), (Motte-Cajori, II, 545; (Koyré-Cohen), II, 762: Deuteronomy 4:39; Deuteronomy 10: 14; John 14: 2; Acts 17: 27–28.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Newton, Principia (note 15), (Motte-Cajori), II, 545; (Koyré-Cohen), II, 762.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gregory’s Memoirs (note 16), p. 30.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen, Introduction (note 10), pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Newton, Correspondence (note 2), III, 193–95 (Fatio de Duillier to Huygens, 5 Feb. 1691/92).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ibid., III, 335–36, 338 (Gregory’s Memoranda, 5, 6, 7 May 1694).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.E. McGuire and P.M. Rattansi, “Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan,’”Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 21 (1966), 108–43; Casini, “Newton: the Classical Scholia” (note 4); Gregory MS 247, Library of the Royal Society of London. Drafts of several items exist in the Portsmouth Collection, University Library, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Isaac Newton, draft Scholium to Proposition IX, as translated in McGuire and Rattansi, “Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan’”(note 26), p. 119; original Latin in Casini, “Newton: the Classical Scholia” (note 4), p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S.K. Heninger, Jr., Touches of Sweet Harmony. Pythagorean Cosmology and Renaissance Poetics (San Marino, CA: The Huntington Library, 1974), pp. 201–14, quotation from Stanley’s History of Philosophy (2 vols.; London, 1656–60) on p. 204. Newton once owned Stanley’s Historia philosophiœ Orientalis (Amstelodami, 1690) and the third edition of his History of Philosophy (London, 1701): John Harrison, the Library of Isaac Newton (Cambridge/London/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    1978), p. 242, nos. 1551–52. Both items are, however, missing from that portion of Newton’s library that now survives at Trinity College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heninger, Touches of Sweet Harmony (note 28), p. 230, note 18.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Casini, “Newton: the Classical Scholia” (note 4), e.g., pp. 39–40, notes 4–5, 17–18.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Justin Martyr in his Exhortation to the Greeks, as quoted in Heninger, Touches of Sweet Harmony (note 28), p. 202; for a selection of later authorities repeating Justin’s rendition of Pythagorean thought, see ibid., pp. 202–203 and 229, note 9.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    Justin, St, martyr, Opera… (Coloniae, 1686): Harrison, Library (note 28), p. 170, no. 868, surviving as Newton Library NQ. 18.251, Trinity College, Cambridge, with some pages dog-eared, presumably by Newton himself.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    E.g., Clemens, Alexandrinus, Opera… (Lutetiae Parisiorum, 1641); Cyril, St, Abp of Jerusalem, Opera… (Lutetiae Parisiorum, 1631); Hierocles, Alexandrinus, Commen-tarius in aurea Pythagoreorum carmina… (Parisiis, 1583); Stanley, History of Philosophy (note 28): Harrison, Library (note 28), respectively, p. 120, no. 398; p. 128, no. 476; p. 159, no. 762; p. 242, no. 1552. The Opera of Clement of Alexandria is now missing, as is the work by Stanley, but Cyril’s Opera and Hierocles’ Commentarius are extant as, respectively, Newton Library NQ. 11. 48 and NQ. 9. 78, Trinity College, Cambridge, both with some signs of dog-earing. One should also note in Newton’s library the presence of several other works relevant to Pythagorean-Platonic thought and ancient music: Iamblichus, Chalcidensis, De mysteriis liber… (Oxonii, 1678) (Harrison, Library, p. 166, no. 827, now Tr/NQ.IL 26), idem, De vita Pythagorica Liber… (Am-stelodami, 1707) (Harrison, Library, p. 166, no. 818, now Tr/NQ. 8. 75, with dog-earing); Marcus Meibomius, Antiquœ musicœ auctores septem… (2 vols.; Amstelodami, 1652) (Harrison, Library, p. 190, no. 1060, now Tr/NQ. 8. 36 & 37, including the musical works of Aristides Quintilianus, Nicomachus Gerasenus, and Martianus Capella, among others); Ficino’s edition of Plato, Opera… (Francofurti, 1602), Library, p. 218, no. 1325, now missing); Claudius Ptolemaeus, Harmonicorum libri III… (Oxonii, 1682) (Harrison, Library, p. 222, no. 1357, now Tr/NQ. 10. 36). See also Penelope Gouk, “Newton and music: From the microcosm to the macrocosm,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science I (1986), 36–59.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Heninger, Touches of Sweet Harmony (note 28), pp. 209–10.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    Otto von Simson, The Gothic Cathedral. Origins of Gothic Architecture and the Medieval Concept of Order (2nd ed., revised; Bollingen Series XLVIII; New York: Pantheon Books, 1962), pp. 8–38; Helen Rosenau, Vision of the Temple. The Image of the Temple of Jerusalem in Judaism and Christianity (London: Oresko Books, 1979)Google Scholar
  37. 35a.
    R.J. van Pelt, Tempel van de Wereld, de kosmisch symboliek van de tempel van Salomo (HES Uitgevers/Utrecht: H & S, 1984), esp. pp. 323–29 and (English Abstract) pp. 397–98. For a generalized statement of the symbolism of the center, including fire altars and temples, as imago mundi, see also Mircea Eliade, Images and Symbols. Studies in Religious Symbolism, trans, by Philip Mairet (London: Harvill Press, 1961), pp. 37–56. For Newton’s work in this area, see Westfall, “Isaac Newton’s Theologiae Gentilis Origines Philosophicae” (note 4)Google Scholar
  38. 35b.
    Isaac Newton, The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended. To which is Prefix’d, A Short Chronicle from the First Memory of Things in Europe, to the Conquest of Persia by Alexander the Great (London: Printed for J. Ton-son in the Strand, and J. Osborn and T. Longman in Paternoster Row, 1728), pp. 332–46 and Plates I-III. Plate I has been reproduced in Rosenau, Vision of the Temple, p. 123.Google Scholar
  39. See also Newton’s section of the Temple altar reproduced in Joseph Rykwert, On Adam’s House in Paradise. The Idea of the Primitive Hut in Architectural History (2nd ed.; Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press, 1981), p. 217 (Babson MS number not given but probably the reproduction is from the Sir Isaac Newton Collection, Babson Institute, Babson Park, MA, Babson MS 434, written by Newton on the Temple of Solomon in the 1680s). I have explored this topic in more depth in my forthcoming The Janus Faces of Genius: the Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought.Google Scholar
  40. 36.
    Isaac Newton, draft Query 23, University Library, Cambridge, MS Add. 3970, f. 619r, as quoted in McGuire and Rattansi, “Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan’” (note 26), p. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 37.
    Newton, Principia (note 15), (Motte-Cajori), II, 545; (Koyré-Cohen), II, 762.Google Scholar
  42. 38.
    Cicero, De natura deorum, I, x-xi (Loeb Classical Library, trans, by H. Rackham).Google Scholar
  43. 39.
    Virgil, Georgics, IV, 219–27 (trans, by Robert Wells, 1982).Google Scholar
  44. 40.
    Idem, Aeneid, VI, 724–27 (verse trans, by Allen Mandelbaum, 1971).Google Scholar
  45. 41.
    Cf. Virgil: Georgics I & IV, ed. by H.H. Huxley (London: Methuen & Co., 1963), pp. 162–63; Jean Martin, Histoire du texte des Phénomènes d’Aratos (Etudes et Commentaires XXII; Paris: Librarie C. Klincksieck, 1956).Google Scholar
  46. 42.
    Issac Newton, draft Scholium, University Library, Cambridge, MS 3965.12 f. 269, as quoted in McGuire and Rattansi, “Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan”’ (note 26), p. 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 43.
    Aratus, Phaenomena, 11. 1–9 (trans, by Sanley Frank Lombardo, 1976); cf. Stanley Frank Lombardo, “Aratus’ Phaenomena: An Introduction and Translation” (Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 1976), esp. pp. vii, 1–3, 30–32, 54–57, 102–03, quotation from p. 102.Google Scholar
  48. 44.
    Lombardo, “Aratus’ Phaenomena” (note 43), pp. 1–3, 102; Cleanthês’ Hymn to Zeus, in the Oxford Book of Greek Verse in Translation, ed. by T.F. Higham and C.M. Bowra (Oxford; At the Clarendon Press, 1938), pp. 533–35, no. 483 (trans, by Michael Balkwill).Google Scholar
  49. 45.
    Philo, Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis IL, III (Legum Allegoria), I, 1 (The Loeb Classical Library, trans, by F.H. Colson and G.H. Whitaker).Google Scholar
  50. 46.
    David E. Hahm, The Origins of Stoic Cosmology (N. p.: Ohio State University Press, 1977), pp. 3–28, esp. pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  51. 47.
    H.A.K. Hunt, A Physical Interpretation of the Universe. The Doctrines of Zeno the Stoic (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1976), pp. 47, 50; Robert B. Todd, Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. A Study of the De mixtione with preliminary essays, texts, translation and commentary (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1976); Paul Hager, “Chrysippus’ Theory of Pneuma,” Prudentia 14 (1982), 97–108.Google Scholar
  52. 48.
    David Winston, Logos and Mystical Theology in Philo of Alexandria (Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press, 1985), pp. 9–12, provides a recent survey of modern opinion; see also Samuel Sandmel, Philo of Alexandria. An Introduction (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979); Max Pulver, “The Experience of the Pneuma in Philo,” trans, by Ralph Manheim, in Spirit and Nature. Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks, ed, by Joseph Campbell (Bollingen Series XXX. 1; Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), pp. 107–21, originally published in German in Eranos-Jahrbuch 13 (1945).Google Scholar
  53. 49.
    Philo, Judaeus, Omnia quœ extant opera… (Lutetiae Parisiorum, 1640); Harrison, Library (note 28), p. 216, no. 1300, now missing.Google Scholar
  54. 50.
    Sandmel, Philo (note 48), p. 28.Google Scholar
  55. 51.
    M. Spanneut, Le Stoïcisme des pères de l’Eglise: de Clément de Rome à Clément d’Alexandrie (Paris: Seuil, 1957),pp. 288–91, 394–96, 426.Google Scholar
  56. 52.
    Cf. B.J.T. Dobbs, “Newton’s Alchemy and His Theory of Matter,” Isis 73 (1982), 511–28, esp. p. 523 and the references cited there.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 53.
    Léontine Zanta, La renaissance du stoïcisme au XVI e siècle (Bibliothèque littéraire de la renaissance, nouvelle série, tome V; Paris: Librairie ancienne Honoré Champion, Edouard Champion, 1914), esp. pp. 225–30; Jason Lewis Saunders, Justus Lipsius. The Philosophy of Renaissance Stoicism (New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1955), pp. 121–37; Justus Lipsius, Physiologiae stoicorum libri tres: L. Annaeo Senecœ aliisq. scrip-toribus illustrandis, in Justi Lipsi V. C. Opera omnia, postremum ab ipso aucta et recensi-ta: nunc primum copioso rerum indice illustrata (4 vols.; Vesaliæ: Apud Andræam ab Hoogenhuysen et Societatem, 1675), IV, 823–1006, esp. Physiologiae stoicorum, I, iii-ix, in Opera, IV, 837–53, quotation from IV, 851. Newton is not known to have owned Lipsius’ Physiologiae stoicorum even though two other of Lipsius’ works were in his library: Epistolarum selectarum chilias… (Genevas, 1611) and Roma illustrata, sive Anti-quitatum Romanarum breviarum… Ex nova recensione A. Thysii… Postrema ed. (Am-stelodami, 1657): Harrison, Library (note 28), p. 180, nos. 959–60, now, respectively, Tr/NQ. 8. 135 and missing.Google Scholar
  58. 54.
    Lipsius, Physiologiae stoicorum, II, xiii, in Opera (note 53), IV, 927–30.Google Scholar
  59. 55.
    Cf. supra at note 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 56.
    Samuel Sambursky, Physics of the Stoics (reprint of the 1959 ed.; A Radius Book; London: Hutchinson, 1971), esp. pp. 33–40; David Charles Kubrin, “Newton and the Cyclical Cosmos: Providence and the Mechanical Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (1967), 325–46; idem, “Providence and the Mechanical Philosophy: The Creation and Dissolution of the World in Newtonian Thought. A Study of the Relations of Science and Religion in Seventeenth Century England” (Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, 1968). Cf. also B.J.T. Dobbs, “Newton and Stoicism,” in Spindel Conference 1984: Recovering the Stoics, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 Supplement (1985), 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 57.
    Cicero, De natura deorum (note 38), II, xlv, 115–16.Google Scholar
  62. 58.
    I have traced it as far back as 1850: M. Tullii Ciceronis, De natura deorum libri tres, erklaert von G.F. Schoemann (Leipzig: Weidmanssche Buchhandlung, 1850), p. 157.Google Scholar
  63. 59.
    Hunt, Physical Interpretation (note 47), pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
  64. 60.
    Titi Lvcreti Cari De Rervm Natvra Libri Sex, ed. with Prolegomena, Critical Apparatus, Translation, and Commentary by Cyril Bailey (3 vols.; Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1947), II, 782–83.Google Scholar
  65. 61.
    Michael Lapidge, “A Stoic Metaphor in Late Latin Poetry: the Binding of the Cosmos,” Latomus 39 (1980), 817–37;Google Scholar
  66. 61a.
    James Hutton, “Spenser’s ‘Adamantine Chains’: A Cosmo-logical Metaphor,” in The Classical Tradition. Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of Harry Caplan, ed. by Luitpold Wallach (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966), pp. 572–94, esp. pp. 583–88.Google Scholar
  67. 62.
    Isaac Newton, Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, foreword by Albert Einstein, intro. by Sir Edmund Whittaker, preface by I. Bernard Cohen, analytical table of contents by Duane H.D. Roller (based on the 4th London ed. of 1730); New York: Dover Publications, 1952), pp. 400–01.Google Scholar
  68. 63.
    Richard S. Westfall, Force in Newtons Physics. The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century (London: Macdonald; New York: American Elsevier, 1971), pp. 323–423; idem, “Newton and the Hermetic Tradition,” in Science, Medicine and Society in the Renaissance. Essays to honor Walter Pagel, ed. by Allen G. Debus (2 vols.; New York: Science History Publications, 1972), II, 183–98; B.J.T. Dobbs, The Foundations of Newton’s Alchemy, or “The Hunting of the Greene Lyon” (Cambridge/London/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 210–13.Google Scholar
  69. 64.
    Cf. Dobbs, “Newton’s Corpus: An Integrated View” (note 3), and idem, “Newton’s Alchemy and His Theory of Matter” (note 52).Google Scholar
  70. 65.
    Cf. supra, at note 16.Google Scholar
  71. 66.
    Newton, Opticks (note 62), p. 403. Cf. also Alexandre Koyré and I. Bernard Cohen, “The Case of the Missing Tanquam. Leibniz, Newton, and Clarke,” Isis 52 (1961), 555–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. T. Dobbs
    • 1
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations