Partnership in Glory: Newton and Locke Through the Enlightenment and Beyond

  • Mordechai Feingold
Part of the Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas book series (ARCH, volume 123)


Many names have been given to the eighteenth century: first and foremost the “Enlightenment,” but also the “Century of Light,” the “Age of Reason,” and even the “Age of Newton.” In view of the complex nature of the century, it is not surprising that such grand titles — and, more importantly, the unity of doctrine they imply — have been increasingly challenged. Which Enlightenment? What Reason? Whose Light? are just a few of the questions being posed by a new breed of historians determined to rid the eighteenth century of its traditionally one-dimensional interpretation. Certainly their probing has radically altered our perception of the period, giving it a depth and complexity missing a generation ago.


Eighteenth Century Moral Philosophy Single Vision Natural Religion Imaginary Dialogue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    For some recent re-evaluations of “Newtonianism” see Yehuda Elkana, “Newtonianism in the Eighteenth Century,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, XXII (1971), 297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1a.
    R.W. Home, “‘Newtonianism’ and the Theory of the Magnet,” History of Science, XV (1977), 252–66Google Scholar
  3. 1b.
    Idem, “Out of a Newtonian Straightjacket: Alternative Approaches to Eighteenth-Century Physical Science,” in Studies in the 18th Century IV (1979), 235–49Google Scholar
  4. 1c.
    Robert E. Schofield, “An Evolutionary Taxonomy of Eighteenth-Century Newtonianism,” in Studies in 18 Century Culture, VII (1978), 175–92Google Scholar
  5. 1d.
    W.A. Smeaton, “E.F. Geoffroy was not a Newtonian Chemist,” Ambix, XVIII (1971), 212–14.Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    G.A.J. Rogers, “The Empiricism of Locke and Newton,” in Philosophers of the Enlightenment ed. S.C. Brown (Brighton, 1979), 1–30 ;Idem, “Locke’s Essay and Newton’s Principia” Journal of the History of Ideas, XXXIX (1978).Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    a See also L.L. Laudan, “Thomas Reid and the Newtonian Turn of British Methodological Thought,” in The Methodological Heritage of Newton eds. Robert E. Butts and John W. Davis (Toronto, 1971), p. 105.Google Scholar
  8. 2b.
    See in general, Gerd Buchdahl, The Image of Newton and Locke in the Age of Reason (London and New York, 1961).Google Scholar
  9. 3.
    John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch (Oxford, 1975), “Epistle to the Reader,” IV.vii. 11Google Scholar
  10. 4.
    Mr. Locke’s Reply to the Right Reverend Lord Bishop of Worcester (London, 1699), p. 408; John Locke, The Conduct of the Human Understanding (London, 1890), pp. 43–44Google Scholar
  11. 4a.
    The Educational Writings of John Locke, ed. James L. Axtel (Cambridge, 1968), p. 306.Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    Locke, Essay, IV.iv. 6, 7; I.ii. 1; IV.x. 1.Google Scholar
  13. 6.
    The Correspondence of John Locke, ed. E.S. De Beer, 7 vols, to date (Oxford, 1976-), IV. 508, 524.Google Scholar
  14. 7.
    Isaac Newton, The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Andrew Motte (London, 1729, repr. London, 1968), “The Author’s Preface”Google Scholar
  15. 7a.
    The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (New York, 1952), p. 405.Google Scholar
  16. 8.
    Henry Pemberton, A View of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy (London, 1728), “Preface”Google Scholar
  17. 8a.
    William P. Jones, The Rhetoric of Science (London, 1966), p. 146Google Scholar
  18. 8b.
    Colin Maclaurin, An Account of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophical Discoveries (1748, repr. New York and London, 1968), p. 3.Google Scholar
  19. 9.
    The Correspondence of John Locke, V. 702. See also VI. 38.Google Scholar
  20. 10.
    Nicholas Jolley, Leibniz and Locke (Oxford, 1984), pp. 36–37, 54–55Google Scholar
  21. 10a.
    Hans Aarsleff, From Locke to Saussure (Minneapolis, 1982), p. 51Google Scholar
  22. 10b.
    The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, ed. H.G. Alexander (Manchester, 1956), p. 11Google Scholar
  23. 10c.
    G.W. Leibniz, The Monadology and other Philosophical Writings (Oxford, 1968), p. 388.Google Scholar
  24. 11.
    Alexandre Koyré, Newtonian Studies (Chicago, 1968), p. 92n.l.Google Scholar
  25. 12.
    The Critical Works of John Dennis, ed. Edward N. Hooker, 2 vols. (Baltimore, 1939), I. 161Google Scholar
  26. 12a.
    Maren-Sofie Rostvig, The Happy Man, 2 vols. (Oslo, 1954–58), II. 133, 217.Google Scholar
  27. 13.
    Malebranche, Oeuvres Complètes, 19 Vols. (Paris, 1961), XIX.869Google Scholar
  28. 13a.
    Henry Guerlac, “Some areas for Further Newtonian Studies,” History of Science, XVII (1979), 75–101Google Scholar
  29. 13b.
    Dennis J. Fletcher, “Bolingbroke and the Diffusion of Newtonianism in France” in Studies on Voltaire and the 18th Century, LIII (1967), 29–46; Characteristically, Voltaire would “claim the principal credit” for “Newton’s conquest of France.”Google Scholar
  30. 13c.
    Henry Guerlac, “Where the Statue Stood: Divergent Loyalties to Newton in the Eighteenth Century,” in Aspects of the Eighteenth Century, ed. Earl R. Wasserman (Baltimore, 1945), p. 318.Google Scholar
  31. 14.
    Rostvig, The Happy Man, II. 30–31; Maynard Mack, The Garden and the City (Toronto, 1969), p. 308Google Scholar
  32. 14a.
    Shelby T. McCloy, Gibbon’s Antagonism to Christianity (London, 1933), p. 40n.6Google Scholar
  33. 14b.
    The Correspondence of Edward Young, ed. Henry Pettit (Oxford, 1971), p. 600.Google Scholar
  34. 15.
    Alexander Pope, An Essay on Man, ed. Maynard Mack (New Haven, 1951), p. 53.Google Scholar
  35. 16.
    David Hume, Treatise of Human Nature, ed. LA. Selby-Bigge (Oxford, 1896), “Preface.”Google Scholar
  36. 17.
    Quoted by Charles Gillespie, The Edge of Objectivity (Princeton, 1960), p. 179.Google Scholar
  37. 18.
    Frank E. Manuel, Freedom From History (New York and London, 1972), pp. 190–91Google Scholar
  38. 18a.
    Coleridge on the Seventeenth Century, ed. Robert F. Brinkley (repr. New York, 1968), p. 94.Google Scholar
  39. 19.
    Perry Miller, Errand into the Wilderness (Cambridge, Mass., 1956), p. 168.Google Scholar
  40. 20.
    Ernst Cassirer, Kant’s Life and Thought (New Haven, 1981), pp. 104, 114.Google Scholar
  41. 21.
    Hans Aarsleff, From Locke to Saussure (Minneapolis, 1982), p. 49Google Scholar
  42. 21a.
    Idem, “Language and Victorian Ideology,” The American Scholar, p. 367.Google Scholar
  43. 22.
    Aarsleff, From Locke to Saussure, p. 124; Coleridge and the Seventeenth Century, p. 75; Carl Becker, The Declaration of Independence (New York, 1953), p. 56.Google Scholar
  44. 23.
    The Keats Circle, ed. Hyder E. Rollins, 2 Vols. (Cambridge, Mass., 1948), II.39Google Scholar
  45. 23a.
    Walter Savage Landor, Works (London, 1876), III.144.Google Scholar
  46. 24.
    William Wordsworth, The Prelude, III. 63.Google Scholar
  47. 25.
    The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, ed. David V. Erdman (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1982), p. 159.Google Scholar
  48. 25a.
    See Donald Ault, “Incommensurability and Interconnection in Blake’s Anti-Newtonian Text,” Essential Articles for the Study of William Blake, ed. Nelson Hilton (Hamden, Conn., 1986), 141–73Google Scholar
  49. 25b.
    Idem, Visionary Physics (Chicago and London, 1974).Google Scholar
  50. 26.
    Yeats, Pages from a Diary quoted in S.P. Rosenbaum ed. English Literature and British Philosophy (Chicago and London, 1971), p. 5.Google Scholar
  51. 27.
    The Early Lives of Milton, ed. Helen Darbishire (London, 1932), p. 192Google Scholar
  52. 27a.
    John Toland, Letters to Serena (London, 1704), pp. 166, 222–29, passimGoogle Scholar
  53. 27b.
    Stephen H. Daniel, John Toland (Toronto, 1984), p. 121.Google Scholar
  54. 28.
    Letters to Serena, pp. 177, 183, 201–2, 233–36; John Toland, Christianity Not Mysterious 2nd ed. (London, 1696), addition p. 180.Google Scholar
  55. 29.
    C.B. Wilde, “Hutchinsonianism, Natural Philosophy and Religious Controversy in Eighteenth Century Britain,” History of Science, XVIII (1980), 1–24Google Scholar
  56. 29a.
    Ben Vermeulen, “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on Infinitesimals,” Berkeley Newsletter, VIII (1985), 1–5Google Scholar
  57. 29b.
    Albert J. Kuhn, “Glory or Gravity: Hutchinson vs. Newton,” Journal of the History of Ideas, XXII (1961), 303–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mordechai Feingold
    • 1
  1. 1.Boston UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations