Abstract
A well-established biophysical theory of human requirements of indoor climate denies the existence of any individual or group (including ethnic and cultural) differences in the experience of the thermal environment, or of attitudinal differences upon this experience. This limits severely the possibility of energy conservation in the largest sector of energy use in Europe. Social psychologists, on the other hand, regard thermal requirements as manipulable, particularly by attitudinal interventions which change the evaluations made of given psychophysiological circumstances. Environmental psychologists have taken the view that the human relationship with the environment is at the very least interactive and thus that satisfaction with particular environments can only be predicted if level of personal control, culture, environmental role and personal characteristics are entered into the equation. The two major literatures related to energy conservation (via the biophysical theory, and social psychology) are compared and requirements for further research outlined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, L J, Seligman, C, Fazio, R H & Darley, J M: “Relating attitudes to residential energy use” Environment and Behavior. 13, 590–609 1981
Berry, S & Winkler, J: “Household energy conservation: strategies for energy conservation” Presented at International Conference on Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, September 1982
Cabanac, M: “Plaisir ou deplaisir de la sensation thermique et homeothermie” Physiology and Behaviour. 4, 359–364 1969
Cooper, I: “Comfort and energy conservation: a need for reconciliation” Energy and Buildings. 5, 83–87 1982
Dholakia, R R, Dholakia, N & Firat, F F: “From social psychology to political economy: a model of energy-use behavior” in Ester, P, Gaskell, G, Joerges, B, Midden, C J H, van Raaij, W F & de Vries, T (eds): Consumer Behaviour and Energy Policy: Selected/Edited proceedings of the 1st International Conference September 1982 (Reprinted from Journal of Economic Psychology, 1983, 3(3), 3(4), 4(1) and 4(2) North-Holland Press 1984
Dillman, D A, Rosa, E A & Dillman, J J: “Lifestyle and home energy consumption in the United States: the poor accept lifestyle cutbacks while the wealthy invest in conservation” in Fanger, P O: Thermal Comfort New York: McGraw-Hill pp 79–96 1982
Energy Statistics Yearbook: Statistical Office of the European Communities: Brussels 1982
Ester, P, Gaskell, G, Joerges, B, Midden, C J H, van Raaij, W F & de Vries, T (eds): Consumer Behaviour and Energy Policy: Seletected/Edited proceedings of the 1st International Conference September 1982 (Reprinted from Journal of Economic Psychology, 1983, 3(3), 3(4), 4(1) and 4(2) North-Holland Press
Fanger, P O: Thermal Comfort New York: McGraw-Hill 1972.
Fishbein M & Ajzen, M: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall 1980
Fishman, D S & Pimbert, S L “The thermal environment in offices” Energy and Buildings. 5, 109–116 1982
Gaskell, G, Ellis, P & Pike R: The Energy Literate Consumer Final Report to the Social Science Research Council, Grant no. RB/18/12/3 London 1981
Gottlieb, D & Matre, M: Social dimensions of the energy crisis: a follow-up study Energy Institute, Houston Texas: University of Houston 1976
Grivel, F & Barth, M “Thermal comfort in office spaces: predictions and observations” In O E Fernandes et al Building Energy Management Conference Proceedings Oxford: Pergamon pp 681–693 1981
Heberlein, T A & Warriner, G K: “The influence of price and attitude on shifting residential electricity consumption from on- to off-peak periods” in Ester, P, Gaskell, G, Joerges, B, Midden, C J H, van Raaij, W F & de Vries, T (eds): Consumer Behaviour and Energy Policy: Seletected/Edited proceedings of the 1st International Conference September 1982 (Reprinted from Journal of Economic Psychology, 1983, 3(3), 3(4), 4(1) and 4(2) North-Holland Press 1984.
Hensel, H: “Electrophysiology of cutaneous thermoreceptors” in D R Kenshalo (ed) The Skin Senses Charles C Thomas: Springfield, Illinois 1968
Howell, W C & Kennedy, P: “Field validation of the Fanger thermal comfort model” Human Factors, 21(2), 229–239. 1979
Humphreys, M A: “Desirable temperatures in dwellings” Building Services Engineer. 44, 176–180 1976a
Humphreys, M A: “Field studies of thermal comfort compared and applied” Building Services Engineer, 44, 5–27 1976b
Hunt, D R G & Gidman, M I: “A national field survey of house temperatures” Building and Environment, 17,(2), 107–124 1982
Hunt, D R & Steele, M R: “Domestic temperature trends” Heating and Ventilating Engineering, 54, 5–15 1980
International Organisation for Standardisation ISO/DIS/7730 Moderate thermal environments - determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort 1983
Katzer, R: “The impact of commitment in promoting consumer energy conservation” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy Versailles, France April 1985
McDougall, G, Claxton, G, Brent-Ritchie, J & Dennis-Anderson, C “Consumer energy research: A review” Journal of Consumer Research. 8, 343–354 1981
McIntyre, D A: “Seven point scales of warmth” Building Services Engineer. 45, 215–226 1978
McIntyre, D A: Indocr Climate London: Applied Science Publishers Ltd 1980
Macey, & Brown, M A: “Residential energy conservation: the role of past experience in repetitive household behaviour” Environment and Behavior. 15, 123–141 1983
Midden, C J & Risema, S M: “The meaning of normative processes for energy conservation” in Fanger, P O: Thermal Comfort New York: McGraw-Hills pp 119–137 1982
National Consumer Council (UK) Paving for loft insulation: a review of the Home Insulation Scheme 1978 1980
Olson, M: “Consumers’ attitudes toward energy conservation” Journal of Social Issues. 37, 108–131 1981
Phillips, N & Nelson, E: “Energy savings in private households” Journal of the Market Research Society, 18 (4) 1976
Poulton, E C “Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading” British Journal of psychology. 68, 409–425 1977
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy: Versailles, France April 1985
Ross, M H & Williams, R H: Our energy: regaining control New York: McGraw Hill
Seligman, C, Kriss, M, Darley, J M, Fazio, R H, Becker, L J & Pryor,J B: “Predicting summer energy consumption from homeowners’ attitudes” Applied Social Psychology. 9, 70–90 1979
Stern, P & Gardner, G: “Psychological research and energy policy” American Psychologist. 36, 329–342 1981
Stern, P, Black, J S & Elworth, J: “Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations” Presented at International Conference on Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy. Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, September 1982
Stutzman, T M & Green, S B: “Factors affecting energy consumption: two field tests of the Fishbein-Ajzen model” Journal of Social Psychology. 117, 183–201 1982
van Raaij, W F & Verhallen, T M: “Patterns of residential energy conservation programs” in Fanger, P O: Thermal Comfort New York: McGraw-Hill pp 97–118 1982
Verhallen, T M & Van Raaij, W F: “Household behaviour and the use of natural gas for home heating” Journal of Consumer Research. 8. 253–257 1981
Warren, D: Individual and community effects for response to the energy crisis of winter 1974: an analysis of survey findings from eight Detroit-area communities University of Michigan Institute of labor and Industrial Relations 1974
Waverman, L: “Estimating the demand for energy: heat without light” Energy Policy. 5, 1–11 1977
Winett, R, Kazel, J H, Battalio, R C & Winkler, R C: “Effects of monetary rebates and daily feedback and information on residential electricity conservation” Journal of Applied Psychology. 63, 73–80 1978
Winett, R A, Love, S Q, Stahl, B, Chinn, DE & Lickliter, I N: “A field-based approach to the development of comfort standards, energy conservation strategies, and media-based motivational strategies: a replication and extension of winter findings” ASHRAE Transactions. 89 (2B) 667–679 1983
Winkler, R C & Winett, R A: “Behavioural inteventions in resource management: a systems approach based on behavioral economics” American Psychologist. 37, 421–435 1982
Wyndham, C H: “Behavioural adaptation to cold of Kalahari Bushmen” Journal of Physiology (Paris) 63, 462 et seq 1971
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Griffiths, I.D., Huber, J.W., Baillie, A.P. (1988). The Scope for Energy Conserving Action: A Comparison of the Attitudinal and Thermal Comfort Approaches. In: Canter, D., Jesuino, J.C., Soczka, L., Stephenson, G.M. (eds) Environmental Social Psychology. NATO ASI Series, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2802-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2802-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7760-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2802-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive