Skip to main content

Somatic Embryogenesis in Stationary Phase Suspension Cultures Derived from Hypocotyl Protoplasts of Brassica Napus L.

  • Chapter
Book cover Progress in Plant Protoplast Research

Part of the book series: Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture ((PSBA,volume 7))

  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

To get more efficient regeneration of plants from hypocotyl protoplast-derived suspension cultures of Brassica napus, investigations regarding the time course of cultivation for the formation of somatic embryos were carried out. Although regeneration of plants from hypocotyl protoplasts via callus is sometimes efficient (Glimelius 1984, Chuong et al. 1985, 1987, Barsby et al. 1986), shoot morphogenesis is often not reproducible, when other genotypes are used in regeneration experiments. Reproducible plant regeneration procedures from protoplasts of Brassica species are still needed (Chuong et al. 1987). Most useful may be the regeneration of plants via somatic embryogenesis. Li and Kohlenbach (1982) obtained somatic embryogenesis from protoplast-derived cultures by testing various media, especially the hormone compositions. Our data demonstrate the importance of the choice of stationary phase aggregates as inoculum for embryoid formation in hypocotyl derived suspension cultures of Brassica napus L. These findings may be of general importance, since embryoid formation, greening and plant regeneration could be achieved with an embryogenic line of Digitalis lanata, using a similar sequence of passages. Stationary and late stationary phase cells showed the highest degree of embryoid formation followed by greening and plantlet formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barsby TL, Yarrow SA, and Shepard JF: Plant Cell Reports 5, 101–103, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuong PV, Pauls KP, and Beversdorf WD: Plant Cell Reports 4, 4–6, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chuong PV, Pauls KP, and Beversdorf WD: Plant Cell Reports 6, 67–69, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gamborg OL, Miller FA, and Ojima K: Exp. Cell Res. 50, 151–158, 1968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garve R, Luckner M, Vogel E, Tewes A, and Nover L: Planta med. 40, 92–103, 1980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gliraelius K: Physiol. Plant. 61, 38–44, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li L and Kohlenbach HW: Plant Cell Reports 1, 209–211,1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsey K and Yeoman MM: In: Vasil IK (ed): Cell Culture and Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 2, pp. 61–102, Cell Growth, Nutrition, Cytodifferentiation and Cryopreservation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, Academic Press, Inc. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murashige T and Skoog F: Physiol. Plant. 15, 473–497, 1962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagata T and Takebe I: Planta 99, 12–20, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagy JI and Maliga P: Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 78, 453–455, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spangenberg G, Koop HU, Lichter R, and Schweiger HG: Physiol. Plant. 66, 1–8, 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tewes A, Wappler A, Peschke E-M, Garve R, and Nover L: Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 106, 311–324, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. White PR: In: Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cultures, pp. 12–19, U.G.C. Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Delhi, India, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

K. J. Puite J. J. M. Dons H. J. Huizing A. J. Kool M. Koornneef F. A. Krens

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kranz, E. (1988). Somatic Embryogenesis in Stationary Phase Suspension Cultures Derived from Hypocotyl Protoplasts of Brassica Napus L.. In: Puite, K.J., Dons, J.J.M., Huizing, H.J., Kool, A.J., Koornneef, M., Krens, F.A. (eds) Progress in Plant Protoplast Research. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2788-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2788-9_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7754-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2788-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics