Abstract
To get more efficient regeneration of plants from hypocotyl protoplast-derived suspension cultures of Brassica napus, investigations regarding the time course of cultivation for the formation of somatic embryos were carried out. Although regeneration of plants from hypocotyl protoplasts via callus is sometimes efficient (Glimelius 1984, Chuong et al. 1985, 1987, Barsby et al. 1986), shoot morphogenesis is often not reproducible, when other genotypes are used in regeneration experiments. Reproducible plant regeneration procedures from protoplasts of Brassica species are still needed (Chuong et al. 1987). Most useful may be the regeneration of plants via somatic embryogenesis. Li and Kohlenbach (1982) obtained somatic embryogenesis from protoplast-derived cultures by testing various media, especially the hormone compositions. Our data demonstrate the importance of the choice of stationary phase aggregates as inoculum for embryoid formation in hypocotyl derived suspension cultures of Brassica napus L. These findings may be of general importance, since embryoid formation, greening and plant regeneration could be achieved with an embryogenic line of Digitalis lanata, using a similar sequence of passages. Stationary and late stationary phase cells showed the highest degree of embryoid formation followed by greening and plantlet formation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barsby TL, Yarrow SA, and Shepard JF: Plant Cell Reports 5, 101–103, 1986.
Chuong PV, Pauls KP, and Beversdorf WD: Plant Cell Reports 4, 4–6, 1985.
Chuong PV, Pauls KP, and Beversdorf WD: Plant Cell Reports 6, 67–69, 1987.
Gamborg OL, Miller FA, and Ojima K: Exp. Cell Res. 50, 151–158, 1968.
Garve R, Luckner M, Vogel E, Tewes A, and Nover L: Planta med. 40, 92–103, 1980.
Gliraelius K: Physiol. Plant. 61, 38–44, 1984.
Li L and Kohlenbach HW: Plant Cell Reports 1, 209–211,1982
Lindsey K and Yeoman MM: In: Vasil IK (ed): Cell Culture and Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 2, pp. 61–102, Cell Growth, Nutrition, Cytodifferentiation and Cryopreservation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, Academic Press, Inc. 1985.
Murashige T and Skoog F: Physiol. Plant. 15, 473–497, 1962.
Nagata T and Takebe I: Planta 99, 12–20, 1971.
Nagy JI and Maliga P: Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 78, 453–455, 1976.
Spangenberg G, Koop HU, Lichter R, and Schweiger HG: Physiol. Plant. 66, 1–8, 1986.
Tewes A, Wappler A, Peschke E-M, Garve R, and Nover L: Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 106, 311–324, 1982.
White PR: In: Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cultures, pp. 12–19, U.G.C. Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Delhi, India, 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kranz, E. (1988). Somatic Embryogenesis in Stationary Phase Suspension Cultures Derived from Hypocotyl Protoplasts of Brassica Napus L.. In: Puite, K.J., Dons, J.J.M., Huizing, H.J., Kool, A.J., Koornneef, M., Krens, F.A. (eds) Progress in Plant Protoplast Research. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2788-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2788-9_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7754-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2788-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive