Skip to main content

Abstract

Few political decisions have roused historians to such a swift condemnation, indeed such a unanimous censure as the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, signed at Fontainebleau on 17 October 1685. At the time, however, the Revocation was greeted in France with widespread and unsolicited enthusiasm. Its partial failure—creating as it did more problems than it solved—caused disappointment and slowly led the public to question its legitimacy. Ensuing generations perceived the Edict of Fontainebleau and the anti-Protestant policies which it consecrated as an enormous error and a serious political misjudgment. Such an attitude is too well-known to merit consideration here.

Translated by Ruth Whelan. By court I mean not simply the milieu of Versailles, but the government, the authorities, those with power, beginning with, of course, the king.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Religion prétendue réformée,“ that is, ”self-styled reformed religion,“ the legal term in France that was somewhat disparaging.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Such as Henri Martin or Ernest Lavisse, not to say Jules Michelet.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Or “whose the region, his the religion.” In France it could also be expressed as “Une foi, une loi, un roi” (“one faith, one law, one king”)—in any given territory, one religion only.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Louis Maimbourg (1610–86), for many years a Jesuit, wrote many popular history books, among them histories of Lutheranism and Calvinism. See Elisabeth Israels Perry, From Theology to History: French Religious Controversy and the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes (The Hague, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. They were no more than 6 percent of the total population of the kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  6. This date is New Style, used on the continent. England used Old Style, ten days behind the continent.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This daughter of Henry IV of France had been married to Charles I of England and allowed to stay Roman Catholic. She had a certain influence on her husband, which proved disastrous to him

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Didcipline of the Reformed Chruches of Frane, composed in the sixteeth century, established in detail rules of organization.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Émile-G. Léonard, Histoire générale du protestantisme,3 vols. (Paris, 1961). There is an English edition, 2 vols. (London, 1965–67).

    Google Scholar 

  10. In fact, they were lukewarm and slow: see Jean Orcibal, Louis XIV et les protestants (Paris, 1951), 139–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Desert wilderness“—a biblical allusion—was used to describe both the clandestine meetings and the clandestine reorganization of the French Reformed Churches. The meetings took place in open air, as far as possible from villages where the local authorities—in particular, the Catholic curé (the chief parish priest)—could be aware of the meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The hero of a book by Alfred Jarry, described in a grotesque and half surrealistic fashion as a ferocious tyrant.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Débonnaireté chrétienne.“

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. supra note 10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soldiers—often dragoons—were forcibly lodged in Protestant households, which were obliged to feed them; those unwelcome and ruinous guests were incited to use every harassment to obtain from their hosts the recanting of their religious particularism.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A “pastoral” letter of the bishops, who considered the Protestants in their respective dioceses as their lost sheep. As bishops and intendants jointly addressed themselves to the consistories, the negative answer was to be worded with great caution, not to appear as a subversive resistance to the civil authorities.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The principal tax.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. Louis XIV, Mémoires pour l’instruction du Dauphin, ed. Charles Dreyss, 2 vols. (Paris, 1860), 2: 95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

R. M. Golden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Labrousse, E. (1988). Understanding the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes from the Perspective of the French Court. In: Golden, R.M. (eds) The Huguenot Connection: The Edict of Nantes, Its Revocation, and Early French Migration to South Carolina. Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées/International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 125. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2766-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2766-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7743-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2766-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics