Skip to main content

The Acquisition of Infinitive and Gerund Complements by Second Language Learners

  • Chapter
Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 8))

Abstract

The attempt to understand the nature of the second language acquisition process is a formidable challenge. As is well known, a research program must be carried out within the strict confines of a theoretical framework in order that a principled explanation for the facts can be proposed. Also, an adequate description of the details involved in the acquisition of a particular phenomenon must be provided. On this basis the conclusions drawn from a study are supported or contested, as the case may be, by further research and discussion of the issues in question and in this way we wilt ultimately gain a deeper understanding of that process. It is from such a perspective that this study which describes the second language acquisition of infinitive and gerund complements has been carried out.1 It focuses on the category of verbs that permit both kinds of complements as in:

  1. (1) a.

    Philip likes to buy Inuit prints

  2. b.

    Philip likes buying Inuit prints

as well as verbs that permit only infinitive complements, for example:

  1. (2) a.

    Nick offered to help Nora

  2. b.

    *Nick offered helping Nora

as verbs that permit only gerund complements, for example:

  1. (3) a.

    Robert finished writing an article

  2. b.

    *Robert finished to write an article

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Battistella, E. (1983). “A subjacency puzzle.” Linguistic Inquiry 14, 698–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L., P. Lightbown and L. Hood (1975). “Structure and variation in child language.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L., J. Tackeff. and M. Lahey (1984). “Learning to in complement constructions.” Journal of Child Language 11. 391–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger. D. (1968). “Entailment and the meaning of structures.” Glossa 2, 119–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, D. (1985). “PRO, pronominal or anaphor.” Linguistic Inquiry 16, 471–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brame. M. (1976). Conjectures and refittations in syntax and semantics. New York: Elsevier North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan. J. (1978). “A realistic transformational grammar.” In Halle, Bresnan and Miller (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. (1982). “Control and complementation.” In Bresnan (ed.). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. and E. Wanner (1982). “Language acquisition: the state of the state of the art.” In Wanner and Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams. N. (1984). “The acquisition of infinitival complements: a reply to Bloom, Tackeff and Lahey.” Journal of Child and Language 11, 679–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwakura. K. (1984). “Government theory and NP-ing constructions.” Linguistic Analysis 14, 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, O. (1965). A modem English grammar on historical principles, 1909–49. Reprint. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J. and R. May (1982). “On the constituency of infinitives.” Language 58, 116–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczaj. S. (1976). “-ing, -s, and -ed: a study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections.” Ph.D. Diss., University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limber, J. (1973). “The genesis of complex sentences.” In Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport. E.. L. Gleitman and H. Gleitman (1977). “Mother, I’d rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style.” In Snow and Ferguson (eds.), Talking to children: language input card acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, E. (1983). “Governing -ing.” Linguistic Inquiry 14, 101–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, K. (1982). “Inflection-government and inversion.” The Linguistic Review 1, 417–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. (1973). “Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar.” In Ferguson and Slobin (eds.). Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (1982). “The tense of infinitives.” Linguistic Inquiry 13, 561–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, T. and T. Roeper (1972). “On the subject of gerunds.” Foundations of Language 8, 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mazurkewich, I. (1988). The Acquisition of Infinitive and Gerund Complements by Second Language Learners. In: Flynn, S., O’Neil, W. (eds) Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-085-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2733-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics