Skip to main content

Linguistic Theory, Neurolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition

  • Chapter
Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 8))

  • 571 Accesses

Abstract

Several papers within this volume have raised the question of whether the adult second language learner has access to the principles and parameters of universal grammar (UG). Flynn, Mazurkewich, and White all suggest that the principles involved in first language acquisition are indeed at work in second language learning. Clahsen, on the other hand, argues that adults learners resort to other learning strategies in an effort to systematize the data of the second language. In this paper I suggest that a very different type of evidence may be brought to bear on this issue. The claim is that agrammatic speech of a Broca’s aphasic who has learned a second language as an adult may help tease apart the relevant issues. The paper is intended not so much as an answer to the question of the rule of UG in second language acquisition as much as a justification for a possible line of inquiry.

Many thanks to colleagues for helpful discussions: David Caplan, Suzanne Flynn, Yosef Grodzinsky, Janet Nicol, Michael Paradis, and Lydia White.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aoun, Y. and D. Sportiche (1983). “On the formal theory of government.” The Linguistic Review 2. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badecker, W. and A. Caramazza (1985). “On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatism.” Cognition 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D. (1983a). “Syntactic and Semantic Structures in Agrammatism.” In Kean (ed.), Agrammatism, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D. (1983a). “Adaptive strategies in agrammatism.” Paper presented at conference for Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. April 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D. and C. Futter (1985). “Assignment of thematic roles in an agrammatic aphasic patient.” Brain and Language 27.1, 117–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H. and P. Muysken (1986). “The accessibility of ‘Move alpha’ and the acquisition of German word order by children and adults.” Unpublished Ms., Universität Dusseldorf, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, J. (1976). A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, S. (1984). “A Universal in L2 Acquisition Based on a PBD Typology.” In Eckman, Bell, and Nelson (eds.), Universals of Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, Y. (1984). “The syntactic characterization of agrammatism.” Cognition 16, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, Y. (1986). “Language deficits and the theory of syntax.” Brain and Language 27.1, 135–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamio, A. (1984). “A Linguistic Analysis of Three Japanese Agrammatics’ Speech.” Unpublished Ms., University of Tsukuba and Harvard-Yenching Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamio, A. (1985). “Agrammatism and Linguistic Theory: Toward a Grammatical Characterization of Agrammatic Syndromes.” Unpublished Ms., University of Tsukuba and Harvard-Yenching Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kean, M-L. (1977). “The Linguistic Description of Aphasic Syndromes.” Cognition 5, 9–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. (1984). The Syntax of Verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, S. (1983). “Some Issues in the Linguistic Description of Agrammatism.” Cognition 14, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. and S. Thompson (1973). “Historical Change of Word Order: A Case Study in Mandarin.” In Anderson and Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics I. North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. and S. Thompson (1975). “The Semantic Function of Word Order: A Case Study in Mandarin.” In Li (ed.), Word Order and Word Order Change. University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazurkewich, I. (1984). “The Acquisition of the Dative Alternation by Second Language Learners and Linguistic Thoery.” Language Learning 34, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, M. (1977). “Bilingualism and Aphasia.” Studies in Neurolinguistics 3, 65–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, M. (1983). Readings on Aphasia in Bililnguals and Polyglots. Marcel Didier, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi. L. (1985). “Two notes on the linguistic interpretation of Broca’s aphasia.” In Kean (ed.), Agrammatism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S. (I983). “The Syntactic Forms of Predication.” Ph.D. Diss., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. (1983). “Evidence for grammar in agrammatic speech.” Ms. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis. L. (1984). “Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation.” Ph.D. Diss., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • White. L. (1985). “Universal Grammar as a Source of Explanation in Second Language Acquisition.” In Wheatley et al. (eds.). Current Approaches to Second Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the ¡984 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linguistics Symposium, Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1980). “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 11. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurif, E. and A. Caramazza (1976). “Psycholinguistic structures in aphasia: studies in syntax and semantics.” In Whitaker and Whitaker (eds.), Studies in Neurolinguistics, Volume One. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Travis, L. (1988). Linguistic Theory, Neurolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition. In: Flynn, S., O’Neil, W. (eds) Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-085-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2733-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics