Abstract
A major underlying assumption of generative grammar is that the first language learner comes to the acquisition task equipped with innate, specifically linguistic, knowledge, or Universal Grammar (UG). Much work has been done in trying to characterize precisely what properties of language fall within UG, and therefore do not have to be learned. Recent work assumes that many principles of UG are parameterized; that is, that they vary somewhat from language to language in their effects. The assumption of an innate language component to the mind is motivated by arguments concerning the “poverty of the stimulus,” the fact that the linguistic competence of the adult is too complex to be projected by the child from the input data alone, or from the data interacting with nonlinguistic cognitive principles, given certain short-comings in that input (Baker and McCarthy, 1981; Hornstein and Lightfoot, 1981). This projection problem can be overcome if the child is assumed to be predisposed to deal with language input in quite restricted ways, with UG providing limitations on possible grammars.
The research reported here was carried out with the support of a grant SSHRCC Grant no. 410–84–0211, for which I am grateful. I should like to thank Eric Kellerman and Lisa Travis for comments and suggestions, as well as my discussant Wayles Brown. I should also like to thank staff and students at the following schools in Quebec for their cooperation: Turner Language School, Canadian Forces Base. St. Hubert; College Rosemont. Montreal; Polyvalente St. Joseph. Mt. Laurier.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adjemian, C. and J. Liceras (1984). “Accounting for adult acquisition of relative clauses: universal grammar, L1, and structuring the intake.” In Eckman, Bell, and Nelson (1984).
Baker, C. and J. McCarthy, eds. (1981). The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1986). “The logical problem of foreign language learning.” To appear in Linguistics Analysis.
Bley-Vroman, R., G. Ioup, and S. Felix (1987). “The accessibility of UG in adult language acquisition: evidence from the acquisition of WH-movement.” Paper presented at the Seventh Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum, February 1987.
Borer, H. and K. Wexler (1987). “The maturation of syntax.” In Roeper and Williams (1987).
Chomsky, N. (1973). “Conditions on transformations.” In Anderson and Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Chomsky, N. (1977). “On wh-movement.” In Culicover, Wasow and Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981a). “Principles and parameters in syntactic theory.” In Hornstein and Lightfoot (1981).
Chomsky, N. (1981b). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clahsen, H. and P. Muysken (1986). “The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: a study of the acquisition of German word order.” Second Language Research 2, 93–119.
Eckman, F. (1984). “Universais, typologies, and interlanguages.” In Rutherford (ed.), Language universais and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eckman, F., L. Bell and D. Nelson, eds. (1984). Universais of second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Felix, S. (1984). “Maturational asepcts of universal grammar.” In Davies, Criper, and Howatt (eds.), Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Finer, D. and E. Broselow (1986). “L2 acquisition of reflexives.” In NELS 16: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Northeastern Linguistics Society Meeting. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
Flynn, S. (1984). “A universal in L2 acquisition based on a PBD typology.” In Eckman, Bell, and Nelson (1984).
Flynn, S. (1987). A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition: Experimental studies in Anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Gass, S. and L. Selinker, eds. (1983). Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Genesee, F., P. Rogers, and N. Holobow (1983). “The social psychology of second language learning: another point of view.” Language Learning 33, 209–24.
Hilles, S. (1986). “Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter.” Second Language Research 2, 33–52.
Hornstein, N. and D. Lightfoot, eds. (1981). Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman.
Huang, J. (1982). “Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar.” Ph.D. Diss., MIT.
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hyltenstam, K. (1984). “Language typology, language universais, markedness and second language acquisition.” In Andersen (ed.), Second languages: a crosslinguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kayne, R. (1981). “ECP extensions.” Linguistic Inquiry 12, 93–133.
Kayne, R. (1983). “Connectedness.” Linguistic Inquiry 14, 223–49.
Lasnik, H. and M. Saito (1984). “On the nature of proper government.” Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–89.
Oller, J. (1979). Language tests at school. London: Longman.
Otsu, Y. (1981). “Universal grammar and syntactic development in children: toward a theory of syntactic development.” Ph.D. Diss., MIT.
Phinney, M. (1987). “The prodrop parameter in second language acquisition.” In Roeper and Williams (1987).
Ritchie, W. (1978). “The right roof constraint in adult-acquired language.” In Ritchie (ed.), Second language acquisition research: issues and implications. New York: Academic Press.
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Roeper, T. (1982). “The role of universais in the acquisition of gerunds.” In Wanner and Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roeper, T. and E. Williams, eds. (1987). Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ross, J. (1967). “Constraints on variables in syntax.” Ph.D. Diss., MIT.
Selinker, L. (1972). “Interlanguage.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 10, 209–31.
Sobin, N. (1987). “The variable status of comp-trace phenomena.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 33–60.
Sportiche, D. (1981). “Bounding nodes in French.” Linguistic Review 1, 219–46.
Torrego, E. (1984). “On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects.” Linguistic Inquiry 15, 103–29.
Van Buren, P. and M. Sharwood Smith (1985). “The acquisition of preposition stranding by second language learners and parametric variation.” Second Language Research 1, 18–46.
White, L. (1982). Grammatical theory and language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris.
White, L. (1985a). “Is there a logical problem of second language acquisition?” TESL Canada 2.2, 29–41.
White, L. (1985b). “Universal grammar as a source of explanation in second language acquisition.” In Wheatley et al. (eds.), Current approaches to second language acquisition: proceedings of the 1984 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee linguistics symposium. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
White, L. (1985c). “The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition.” Language Learning 35, 47–62.
White, L. (1986). “Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the ‘pro-drop’ parameter.” In Cook (ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Zobl, H. (1983). “Markedness and the projection problem.” Language Learning 33, 293–313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
White, L. (1988). Island Effects in Second Language Acquisition. In: Flynn, S., O’Neil, W. (eds) Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-085-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2733-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive