Abstract
In this chapter we explore a controversial hypothesis about the nature of the syntactic processing system. The hypothesis, roughly stated, is that some of the procedures that create grammatical patterns in sentences are in an important sense indifferent to the content of the symbols they manipulate, in somewhat the same way that the procedures for long multiplication are indifferent to the numbers involved in the computation. The purpose of this exploration is to uncover the linguistic or cognitive bases of a phenomenon noted by many, including Edward Sapir, who described it in this way:
All languages evince a curious instinct for the development of one or more particular grammatical processes at the expense of others, tending always to lose sight of any explicit functional value that the process may have had in the first instance, delighting, it would seem, in the sheer play of its means of expression .... This feeling for form as such, freely expanding along predetermined lines and greatly inhibited in certain directions by the lack of controlling types of patterning, should be more clearly understood than it seems to be... these submerged and powerfully controlling impulses to definite form operate as such, regardless of the need for expressing particular concepts or of giving consistent external shape to particular groups of concepts (1921, pp. 60–61).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anttila, R. (1972). An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
Bates, E. (1976). Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1982). ‘Functionalist approaches to grammar’. In E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (pp. 173–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1987). ‘Competition, variation, and language learning’. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 157–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berwick, R. C. and Weinberg, A. S. (1984). The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance. Cambridge , MA: MIT Press.
Bever, T. G. (1986). ‘The aesthetic constraint on cognitive structures’. In M. Brand and R. Harnish (Eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief (pp. 314–356). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Block, N. (1980). ‘Introduction: What is functionalism?’ In N. Block (Ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 171–184). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bock, J. K. (1977). ‘The effect of a pragmatic presupposition on syntactic structure in question answering’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 723–734.
Bock, J. K. (1982). ‘Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation’. Psychological Review 89, 1–47.
Bock, J. K. (1986). ‘Syntactic persistence in language production’. Cognitive Psychology 18, 355–387.
Bock, J. K. (1987a). ‘An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures’. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 119–137.
Bock, J. K. (1987b). ‘Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans’. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language (Vol. 3, pp. 337–390). London: Erlbaum.
Bock, J. K. (1987c). ‘Exploring levels of processing in sentence production’. In G. Kempen (Ed.), Natural Language Generation: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and Linguistics (pp. 351–363). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Bock, J. K. and Warren, R. K. (1985). ‘Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation’. Cognition 21, 47–67.
Bolinger, D. (1975). ‘Meaning and form: Some fallacies of asemantic grammar’. In E. F. K. Koerner (Ed.), The Transformational-Generative Paradigm and Modern Linguistic Theory (pp. 3–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bowerman, M. (1973). ‘Structural relationships in children’s utterances: Syntactic or semantic?’ In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 197–213). New York: Academic Press.
Bowerman, M. (1985). ‘What shapes children’s grammars?’ In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical Issues (pp. 1257–1319). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bradley, D. C, Garrett, M. F., and Zurif, E. B. (1980). ‘Syntactic deficits in Broca’s aphasia’. In D. Caplan (Ed.), Biological Studies of Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). ‘Children’s first word combinations’. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41 (1, Serial No. 164).
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., and Franks, J. J. (1972). ‘Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach’. Cognitive Psychology 3, 193–209.
Bresnan, J. and Kaplan, R. M. (1982). ‘Introduction: Grammars as mental representations of language’. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (pp. xvii–lii). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, R. and McNeill, D. (1966). ‘The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5, 325–337.
Caramazza, A. and Berndt, R. S. (1978). ‘Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: A review of the literature’. Psychological Bulletin 85, 898–918.
Carroll, J. B. (1958). ‘Process and content in psycholinguistics’. In Current Trends in the Description and Analysis of Behavior (pp. 175–200). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Chien, Y. C. and Lust, B. (1985). ‘The concepts of topic and subject in first language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese’. Child Development 56, 1359–1375.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1959). ‘Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior’. Language 35, 26–58.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, N. (1980). ‘Rules and representations’. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 1–61.
Clark, H. H. (1965). ‘Some structural properties of simple active and passive sentences’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4, 365–370.
Clark, H. H. and Begun, J. S. (1971). ‘The semantics of sentence subjects’. Language and Speech 14, 34–46.
Clark, H. H. and Malt, B. C. (1984). ‘Psychological constraints on language: A commentary on Bresnan and Kaplan and on Givon’. In W. Kintsch, J. R. Miller, and P. G. Poison (Eds.), Method and Tactics in Cognitive Science (pp. 191–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cooper, W. E., Soares, C, and Reagan, R. T. (1985). ‘Planning speech: A picture’s word’s worth’. Acta Psychologica 58, 107–114.
Dell, G. S. (1986). ‘A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production’. Psychological Review 93, 283–321.
Dell, G. S. and Reich, P. A. (1981). ‘Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 611–629.
deVilliers, J. G. (1980). ‘The process of rule learning in child speech: A new look’. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s Language (pp. 1–44). New York: Gardner Press.
Dik, S. (1978). Functional Grammar. New York: North-Holland.
Duncan, J. (1986). ‘Consistent and varied training in the theory of automatic and controlled information processing’. Cognition 23, 279–284.
Ertel, S. (1977). ‘Where do the subjects of sentences come from?’ In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Sentence Production: Developments in Research and Theory (pp. 141–167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Estival, D. (1985). ‘Syntactic priming of the passive in English’. Text 5, 7–21.
Fay, D. and Cutler, A. (1977). ‘Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon’. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 505–520.
Ferreira, F. and Clifton, C, Jr. (1986). ‘The independence of syntactic processing’. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 348–368.
Fillenbaum, S. (1966). ‘Memory for gist: Some relevant variables’. Language and Speech 9, 217–227.
Firbas, J. (1966). ‘On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis’. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1, 267–280.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frazier, L., Taft, L., Roeper, T., Clifton, C, and Ehrlich, K. (1984). ‘Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension’. Memory and Cognition 12, 421–430.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). ‘The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances’. Language 47, 27–51.
Garcia, E. C. (1979). ‘Discourse without syntax’. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and Syntax (pp. 23–49). New York: Academic Press.
Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: Central Topics. London: Methuen.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). ‘The analysis of sentence production’. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 133–177). New York: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1976). ‘Syntactic processes in sentence production’. In R. J. Wales and E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms (pp. 231–256). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Garrett, M. F. (1980). ‘Levels of processing in sentence production’. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production (Vol. 1, pp. 177–220). London: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1982). ‘Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use’. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions (pp. 19–76). London: Academic Press.
Giles, H. and Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech Style and Social Evaluation. New York: Academic Press.
Gleitman, L. R. (1984). ‘Biological predispositions to learn language’. In P. Marler and H. S. Terrace (Eds.), The Biology of Learning (pp. 553–584). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Glucksberg, S. (1966). Symbolic Processes. Dubuque, I A: W. C. Brown.
Grieve, R. and Wales, R. J. (1973). ‘Passives and topicalization’. British Journal of Psychology 64, 173–182.
Gruber, J. S. (1969). ‘Topicalization in child language’. In D. A. Reibel and S. A. Schane (Ed.), Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar (pp. 422–447). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). ‘Language structure and language function’. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics (pp. 140–165). Baltimore: Penguin.
Harris, M. (1978). ‘Noun animacy and the passive voice: A developmental approach’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 30, 495–501.
Hasher, L. and Zacks, R. T. (1979). ‘Automatic and effortful processes in memory’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108, 356–388.
Humphrey, G. (1963). Thinking: An Introduction to its Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley.
James, C. T., Thompson, J. G., and Baldwin, J. M. (1973). ‘The reconstructive process in sentence memory’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, 51–63.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Stevenson, R. (1970). ‘Memory for syntax’. Nature 227, 412.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). ‘Micro- and macrodevelopmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems’. Cognitive Science 3, 91–118.
Keenan, E. L. and Comrie, B. (1977). ‘Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar’. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63–99.
Kelly, M. H., Bock, J. K., and Keil, F. C. (1986). ‘Prototypicality in a linguistic context: Effects on sentence structure’. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 59–74.
Kroch, A. S. (1982, October). ‘Function and grammar in the history of English periphrastic do’. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Kroch, A., Myhill, J., and Pintzuk, S. (1982). ‘Understanding do’. In K. Tuite et al. (Eds.), Papers from the 18th Regional Meeting (pp. 282–294). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kuno, S. and Kaburaki, E. (1977). ‘Empathy and syntax’. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 627–672.
LaBerge, D. (1981). ‘Automatic information processing: A review’. In J. Long and A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 173–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). ‘Monitoring and self-repair in speech’. Cognition 14, 41–104.
Levelt, W. J. M. and Kelter, S. (1982). ‘Surface form and memory in question answering’. Cognitive Psychology 14, 78–106.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). ‘Perception of the speech code’. Psychological Review 74, 431–461.
Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G. (1985). ‘The motor theory of speech perception revised’. Cognition 21, 1–36.
Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindsley, J. R. (1975). ‘Producing simple utterances: How far ahead do we plan?’ Cognitive Psychology 7, 1–19.
Logan, G. D. (1978). ‘Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 107, 32–63.
Logan, G. D. (1979). ‘On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5, 189–207.
Logan, G. D. (1980). ‘Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data’. Cognitive Psychology 12, 523–553.
Logan, G. D. (1985). ‘Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions’. Canadian Journal of Psychology 39, 367–386.
Luchins, A. S. (1942). ‘Mechanization in problem-solving: The effect of Einstellung’. Psychological Monographs 54 (6, Whole No. 248).
MacWhinney, B. (1977). ‘Starting points’. Language 53, 152–168.
MacWhinney, B. (1987). ‘The competition model’. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., and Kliegl, R. (1984). ‘Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, 127–150.
Malt, B. C. (1985). ‘The role of discourse structure in understanding anaphora’. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 271–289.
Marcus, M. (1980). A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Matthews, R. J. (1979). ‘Are the grammatical sentences of a language a recursive set?’ Synthese 40, 209–224.
Meier, R. P. (1987). ‘Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: Iconically or morphologically determined?’ Journal of Memory and Language 26, 362–376.
Miller, G. A. (1962). ‘Some psychological studies of grammar’. American Psychologist 17, 748–762.
Miller, G. A. (1965). ‘Some preliminaries to psycholinguistics’. American Psychologist 20, 15–20.
Miller, G. A. and Chomsky, N. (1963). ‘Finitary models of language users’. In R. D. Luce, R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 419–491). New York: Wiley.
Osgood, C. E. (1971). ‘Where do sentences come from?’ In D. D. Steinberg and L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology (pp. 497–529). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Osgood, C. E. (1980). Lectures on Language Performance. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Osgood, C. E. and Bock, J. K. (1977). ‘Salience and sentencing: Some production principles’. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.). Sentence Production: Developments in Research and Theory (pp. 89–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paul, H. (1886). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.
Perfetti, C. A. and Garson, B. (1973). ‘Forgetting linguistic information after reading’. Journal of Educational Psychology 65, 135–139.
Pinker, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometrie Explorations of Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I. and Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). ‘Attention and cognitive control’. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Putnam, W. B. and Street, R. L., Jr. (1984). ‘The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech-accommodation theory’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46, 97–114.
Radford, A. (1981). Transformational Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., and Frazier, L. (1983). ‘The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22, 358–374.
Rommetveit, R. (1968). Words, Meanings, and Messages. New York: Academic Press.
Sachs, J. S. (1967). ‘Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse’. Perception and Psychophysics 2, 437–442.
Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., and Marin, O. S. M. (1980). ‘Evidence from aphasia: Isolating the components of a production model’. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production (Vol. 1, pp. 221–241). London: Academic Press.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Schenkein, J. (1980). ‘A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural conversation’. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production: Vol. 1. Speech and Talk (pp. 21–47). London: Academic Press.
Schneider, W. and Fisk, A. D. (1982). ‘Degree of consistent training: Improvements in search performance and automatic process development’. Perception and Psychophysics 31, 160–168.
Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). ‘Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention’. Psychological Review 84, 1–66.
Schwartz, M. F. (1984). ‘What the classical aphasia categories can’t do for us, and why’. Brain and Language 21, 3–8.
Schwartz, M. F. (1987). ‘Patterns of speech production deficit within and cross aphasia syndromes: Application of a psycholinguistic model’. In M. Coltheart, G. Sartori, and R. Job (Eds.), The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Language (pp. 163–199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shiffrin, R. M. and Schneider, W. (1977). ‘Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory’. Psychological Review 84, 127–190.
Slobin, D. I. (1966). ‘Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5, 219–227.
Slobin, D. I. (1977). ‘Language change in childhood and in history’. In J. Macnamara (Ed.), Language Learning and Thought (pp. 185–214). New York: Academic Press.
Stemberger, J. P. (1985). ‘An interactive activation model of language production’. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language (Vol. 1, pp. 143–186). London: Erlbaum.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). ‘Do listeners compute linguistic representations?’ In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 359–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, P. H. and Williams, F. (1968). ‘Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7, 246–250.
Wanner, E. (1974). On Remembering, Forgetting, and Understanding Sentences. The Hague: Mouton.
Weiner, E. J. and Labov, W. (1983). ‘Constraints on the agentless passive’. Journal of Linguistics 19, 29–58.
Whitehurst, G. J., Ironsmith, M., and Goldfein, M. (1974). ‘Selective imitation of the passive construction through modeling’. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 17, 288–302.
Wundt, W. (1900). Die Sprache. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bock, J.K., Kroch, A.S. (1989). The Isolability of Syntactic Processing. In: Carlson, G.N., Tanenhaus, M.K. (eds) Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-075-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2729-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive