Skip to main content

Integrating Information in Text Comprehension: The Interpretation of Anaphoric Noun Phrases

  • Chapter
Book cover Linguistic Structure in Language Processing

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 7))

Abstract

One of the central problems in psycholinguistics is to explain how people put together the information from the separate parts of a discourse to form an integrated representation of its content.1 The content of a discourse is one aspect of its meaning — other aspects include its pragmatic and rhetorical significance. The problem, therefore, is one about the way the meaning of discourse is computed. A theory about the computation of meaning depends on an account of the meanings that discourses can have — an account psycholinguistics might have hoped to borrow from linguistics, but which they were never able to (see the Introduction to this volume for a discussion of why linguistic accounts of meaning have had little impact in psycholinguistics).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaronson, D., and Ferres, S. (1984). ‘The word-by-word reading paradigm: An experimental and theoretical approach’. In D. E. Kieras and M. A. Just (Eds.), New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1971). ‘The abstraction of linguistic ideas’. Cognitive Psychology 3, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., and Franks, J. J. (1972). ‘Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach’. Cognitive Psychology 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. T. and F. R. Chang (1983). ‘Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents’. Memory and Cognition 11, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, C. A. (1984). Inferring indirect objects in sentences: Some implication for the semantics of verbs’. Language and Speech 27, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A., and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. J., and Bransford, J. D. (1972). ‘The acquisition of abstract ideas’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1981a). ‘Anaphoric reference to instances, instantiated and non-instantiated categories: A reading-time study’. British Journal of Psychology 72, 377–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1981b). ‘Mental models as representations of text’. Memory and Cognition 9, 560–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1982). Testing psychological theories about inference making’. Memory and Cognition 10, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1983). ‘What’s wrong with story grammars’. Cognition 15, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1984). ‘Effects of specificity on the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: Central Topics. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1987). ‘Understanding anaphora’. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol. 3. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A., and Oakhill, J. V. (1985). ‘On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: Effects of inference making and verb semantics’. British Journal of Psychology 76, 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S. C., and Sanford, A. J. (1977). ‘Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic relations while reading’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 11–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S. C., and Sanford, A. J. (1981). ‘Bridging inferences and the extended domain of reference’. In J. Long and A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. (1981). ‘Focusing and description in natural language dialogues’. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber and I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, J., and Sag, I. A. (1976). ‘Deep and surface anaphora’. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland, S. E., and Clark, H. H. (1974). ‘What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13, 512–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1983). ‘File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness’. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. R. (1979). ‘Coherence and coreference’. Cognitive Science 3, 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., and Solomon, S. (1973). ‘Memory for tacit implications of sentences’. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98, 203–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). ‘Mental models in cognitive science’. Cognitive Science 4, 71–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. (1981). ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation’. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E. (1984). ‘A method for comparing a simulation to reading time data’. In D. E. Kieras and M. A. Just (Eds.), New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E., and Just, M. A. (1984). New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., and van Dijk (1978). ‘Towards a model of text comprehension and reproduction’. Psychological Review 85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malt, B. C. (1985). ‘The role of discourse structure in understanding anaphora’. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M., and Johnson, N. S. (1977). ‘Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall’. Cognitive Psychology 9, 111–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., and Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L. (1985). ‘Processes of understanding anaphora’. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. G. (1984). ‘A computer-based programmable tachistoscope for non-programmers’. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation and Computers 16, 25–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). ‘Notes on a schema for stories’. In D. G. Bobrow and A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. S. (1967). ‘Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse’. Perception and Psychophysics 2, 437–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I. A., and Hankamer, J. (1984). ‘Toward a theory of anaphoric processing’. Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, A. J., and Garrod, S. C. (1980). ‘Memory and attention in text comprehension: The problem of reference’. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, A. J., Garrod, S. C., and Bell, E. (1979). ‘Aspects of memory dynamics in text comprehension’. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidner, C. L. (1983). ‘Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora’. In M. Brady and R. C. Berwick (Eds.), Computational Models of Discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1979). ‘The temporal locus of inference in the comprehension of brief passages’. Perceptual and Motor Skills 49, 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J. and Esposito, J. (1981). ‘Superficial processing of explicit inferences in text’. Discourse Processes 4, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). ‘Do listeners compute linguistic representations?’ In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen and A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural Language Parsing. CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). ‘Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse’. Cognitive Psychology 9, 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B. L. (1979). A Formal Approach to Discourse Anaphora. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garnham, A. (1989). Integrating Information in Text Comprehension: The Interpretation of Anaphoric Noun Phrases. In: Carlson, G.N., Tanenhaus, M.K. (eds) Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-075-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2729-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics