Abstract
This paper is concerned with the consequences of the familiarity theory of definiteness for the foundations of natural language semantics. What I will in particular explore is the question whether it is possible to interpret the claims in the familiarity theory of definiteness within a strictly realist framework or whether it forces a psychological interpretation. My claim will be that it forces such an interpretation, though I do not wish to claim that there are no possibilities that could be fruitfully pursued within a more realist framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clark, H. H. and Marshall, C. R.: 1981, ‘Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge’, in: Joshi, A. K., Webber, B. L., and Sag, I. (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding, The University Press, Cambridge, pp. 10–63.
Donnellan, K. S.: 1966, ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’, Philosophical Review 75, 281–304.
Grosz, B. and Sag, L.: 1981, ‘Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogs’, in: Joshi, A. K., Webber, B. L., and Sag, I. (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding, The University Press, Cambridge, pp. 84–105.
Heim, L: 1982, ‘The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in: Groenendijk, J. A. G., Janssen, T. M. V., and Stokhof, M. J. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322.
Landman, F.: 1986, ‘Pegs and Alecs’, in: Towards a Theory of Information, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 97–155.
Loebner, S.: 1987, ‘Definites’, forthcoming in Journal of Semantics.
Nunberg, G.: 1978, The Pragmatics of Reference, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.
Nunberg, G.: 1979, ‘The Non-Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 143–184.
Polanyi, L. and Scha, R.: 1984, ‘A Syntactic Approach to Discourse Semantics’, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, pp. 413–419.
Sidner, C. L.: 1981, ‘Focusing for Interpretation of Pronouns’, American Journal of Computational Linguistics 7, 217–231.
Zeevat, H.: 1984, ‘Belief’, in: Landman, F. and Veltman, F. (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 405–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zeevat, H. (1989). Realism and Definiteness. In: Chierchia, G., Partee, B.H., Turner, R. (eds) Properties, Types and Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2723-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2723-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-070-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2723-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive