Abstract
One part of the task in presenting a semantics for a natural language is to show how the meanings of the constituents of a sentence are combined with one another to build up a meaning for the whole sentence. To a certain degree, this part of the task can be worked on without committing oneself too specifically to any particular theory of meaning, and that is what I am going to try to do here. The construction of interest is that of generic sentences. Such sentences are found in all natural languages (though not in all artificial languages), but I will confine my remarks to how English generic sentences are built up from constituent meanings, ever hopeful that what I have to say about English will shed light on similar constructions in a wider range of natural languages. I will begin by giving a series of descriptions of what generic sentences are, working from the most notional and towards the most linguistic, to first stake out the domain of inquiry. I then turn to the semantic composition of such sentences, arguing that they are not uniformly of subject-predicate form, but that a wider variety of internal relations must be recognized. The overall purpose of the following discussion is to provide a set of general considerations that any formal semantic theory incorporating generics must contend with.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barwise, Jon and Perry, John: 1983, Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bolinger, Dwight: 1970, ‘The Lexical Value of “It”’, Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Hawaii, pp. 57–76.
Carlson, Greg N.: 1977, ‘A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413–56.
Carlson, Greg N.: 1980a, Reference to Kinds in English, New York: Garland Publishing.
Carlson, Greg N.: 1980b, ‘Nomic Morphemes’, paper presented at the Fourth Groningen Round Table, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Chierchia, Gennaro: 1984, ‘Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds’, unpublished University of Massachusetts Ph.D. dissertation.
Croft, William: 1986, ‘Universal Quantifiers and Generic Expressions’, Stanford University ms.
Dahl, Osten: 1975, ‘On Generics’, in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–111.
Dahl, Osten: 1985, Tense and Aspect Systems, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Declerck, Renaat: 1985, ‘The Manifold Interpretations of Generic Sentences’, Catholic University of Leuven ms.
Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.
Farkas, Donka and Sugioka, Yoko: 1983, ‘Restrictive If/When Clauses’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 225–58.
Moravcsik, Julius and Gabbay, Dov: 1973, ‘Sameness and Individuation’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 513–26.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1977, ‘What ‘Must’ and ‘Can’ Must and Can Mean’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 337–55.
ter Meulen, Alice: 1985, ‘Generic Information, Conditional Contexts, and Constraints’, in E. Traugott et al. (eds.), On Conditionals, Cambridge: Ambridge University Press.
Milsark, Gary: 1974, ‘Existential Sentences in English’, Unpublished M.I.T. Ph.D. dissertation.
Roberts, Craige: 1986, ‘Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity’, Unpublished University of Massachusetts Ph.D. dissertation.
Schubert, Lenart and Pelletier, F. Jeffry: 1986, ‘Problems in the Representation of the Logical Form of Generics, Plurals, and Mass Nouns’, in E. LePore (ed.), New Approaches to Semantics, New York: Academic Press.
Smith, N. V.: 1975, ‘On Generics’, Transactions of the Philological Society 1975, 27 – 48.
Stump, Gregory: 1981, ‘The Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English’, Unpublished Ohio State University Ph.D. dissertation.
Stump, Gregory: 1985, The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions, Dordrecht: D.Reidel Publishing.
Vendler, Zeno: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, H. J.: 1985, ‘Nondurative Closure of Events’, in J. A. G. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Information, Interpretation, and Inference. Proceedings of the Fifth Amsterdam Colloquium. Dordrecht.
Williams, Edwin: 1975, ‘Small Clauses in English’, in J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4, 249–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carlson, G.N. (1989). On the Semantic Composition of English Generic Sentences. In: Chierchia, G., Partee, B.H., Turner, R. (eds) Properties, Types and Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2723-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2723-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-070-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2723-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive