Advertisement

Raising and Passivization in Breton: An Argument for Anaphoric Traces

  • Randall Hendrick
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 14)

Abstract

GB theory treats sentences like those in (1) as the result of the Move alpha transformation.

Keywords

Direct Object Embed Clause Thematic Role Case Theory Grammatical Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes to Chapter 3

  1. 1.
    Perlmutter (1983) contains arguments within a different theoretical framework favoring the existence of two levels of syntactic structure.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    One qualification must be made to the claim that a zo is a diagnostic for a preverbal subject. Sentences like (i)–(ii), adapted from Gros (1984, p. 286) are possible.Google Scholar
  3. 16.
    Stump (1984) also offers reasons for rejecting the Case Theoretic and Binding Theoretic treatments of Breton agreement.Google Scholar
  4. 17.
    See the discussion in Borer (1981), Brody (1984), Chomsky (1981), (1982), and Sells (1984), among others.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randall Hendrick
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations