Abstract
Agreement in Breton exhibits two major features which are striking. First, both verbs and prepositions are inflected for agreement. Second, verbs and prepositions fail to inflect for person and number when they appear with an expressed subject or prepositional object respectively. On the surface, agreement in Breton appears to be an elaborate, language specific affair, but in the second section of this chapter I argue that the distribution of agreement in Breton can be seen to follow from UG if we recognize two AGRs in this language, an overt and a null AGR. The former is associated with phonologically overt (or synthetic) inflection, while the latter occurs as the phonologically null (or analytic) agreement. The distribution of these two AGR element can be attributed to the Avoid Pronoun Principle, which treats the overt inflection as a pronominal to be avoided. Breton is special only in that it inflects prepositions as well as verbs, and makes use of two AGR elements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes to Chapter 2
See Timm (1986) and Varin (1979) for a discussion of Breton surface word order.
These examples are adapted from Gramadeg (1976).
See Jones and Thomas (1977) for a discussion. It is sometimes even possible to elicit structures like (i).
These examples are adapted from Gramadeg (1976, p. 26). In the Welsh periphrastic construction like (i) pro can occupy the object position because the synthetic agreement appears with the VP.
The correct characterization of such notions is controversial. For example, Chomsky (1981) argues for a structural definition, while Bresnan (1982a) takes the view that such notions are primitives. See also Marantz (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hendrick, R. (1988). Celtic Agreement, The Avoid Pronoun Principle and Binding Theory. In: Anaphora in Celtic and Universal Grammar. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2719-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2719-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7725-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2719-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive