Skip to main content

Celtic Agreement, The Avoid Pronoun Principle and Binding Theory

  • Chapter
Anaphora in Celtic and Universal Grammar

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 14))

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

Agreement in Breton exhibits two major features which are striking. First, both verbs and prepositions are inflected for agreement. Second, verbs and prepositions fail to inflect for person and number when they appear with an expressed subject or prepositional object respectively. On the surface, agreement in Breton appears to be an elaborate, language specific affair, but in the second section of this chapter I argue that the distribution of agreement in Breton can be seen to follow from UG if we recognize two AGRs in this language, an overt and a null AGR. The former is associated with phonologically overt (or synthetic) inflection, while the latter occurs as the phonologically null (or analytic) agreement. The distribution of these two AGR element can be attributed to the Avoid Pronoun Principle, which treats the overt inflection as a pronominal to be avoided. Breton is special only in that it inflects prepositions as well as verbs, and makes use of two AGR elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes to Chapter 2

  1. See Timm (1986) and Varin (1979) for a discussion of Breton surface word order.

    Google Scholar 

  2. These examples are adapted from Gramadeg (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Jones and Thomas (1977) for a discussion. It is sometimes even possible to elicit structures like (i).

    Google Scholar 

  4. These examples are adapted from Gramadeg (1976, p. 26). In the Welsh periphrastic construction like (i) pro can occupy the object position because the synthetic agreement appears with the VP.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The correct characterization of such notions is controversial. For example, Chomsky (1981) argues for a structural definition, while Bresnan (1982a) takes the view that such notions are primitives. See also Marantz (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendrick, R. (1988). Celtic Agreement, The Avoid Pronoun Principle and Binding Theory. In: Anaphora in Celtic and Universal Grammar. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2719-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2719-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7725-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2719-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics