Abstract
Normative ethics is believed by some to be on shaky ground, mainly because two aspects of ethical justification have seemed resistant to solution. One problem concerns how to reason validly from conflicting ethical principles to case resolution. It has been claimed that contemporary normative ethics offers no satisfactory basis for weighing such principles[17]. The other problem involves identifying the ultimate grounds of moral judgments. It has been asserted that the various time-honored theories of normative ethics are uniformly without foundation and that, consequently, we appear unable to arrive at a systematic knowledge of good and evil [21]. In this paper I hope to show that normative ethics — specifically, medical ethics — is indeed viable, that it has substance. I shall attempt to do this by suggesting a method of justification that seems to handle these two problems adequately.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Ackerman, Terrence F.: 1980, ‘What Bioethics Should Be’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, 260–75.
Ackerman, Terrence G.: 1983, ‘Experimentalism in Bioethics Research’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8, 169–80.
Adams, E. M.: 1980, ‘Gewirth on Reason and Morality’, Review of Metaphysics 33, 579–92.
Allen, P., III: 1982, ‘A Critique of Gewirth’s ‘Is-Ought’ Derivation’, Ethics 92, 211–226.
Brandt, R. B.: 1971, ‘Toward a Credible Form of Utilitarianism’, in B. Brody (ed.), Moral Rules and Particular Circumstances, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., pp. 145–178.
Brandt, R. B.: 1983, ‘Problems of Contemporary Utilitarianism: Real and Alleged’, in N. E. Bowie (ed.), Ethical Theory in the Last Quarter of the Twentieth Century, Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, pp. 81–105.
Bond, E. J.: 1973, Review of The Moral Rules, B. Gert, Dialogue 12, 486–501.
Bond, E. J.: 1980, ‘Gewirth on Reason and Morality’, Metaphilosophy 11, 36–53.
Camenisch, P.F.: 1976, ‘Abortion, Analogies and the Emergence of Value’, Journal of Religious Ethics 4, 131–158.
Diggs, B. J.: 1974, Review of The Moral Rules, B. Gert, Journal of Philosophy 71, 88–90.
Donagan, A.: 1977, The Theory of Morality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gert, B.: 1970, The Moral Rules, Harper and Row, New York.
Gewirth, A.: 1978, Reason and Morality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hare, R. M.: 1976, ‘Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism’, in H. D. Lewis (ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy, Fourth Series, George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 113–131.
Jonsen, A. R.: 1987, ‘On Being a Casuist’, in T. Ackerman, G. Graber, C. Reynolds, and D. Thomasma (eds.), Clinical Medical Ethics: Exploration and Assessment, University Press of America, Lanham, Md. pp. 117–29.
Lomasky, L. E.: 1981, ‘Gewirth’s Generation of Rights’, Philosophical Quarterly 31, 248–52.
Maclntyre, A.: 1979, ‘Why is the Search for the Foundations of Ethics So Frustrating?’, Hastings Center Report 9, 16–22.
McCloskey, H. J.: 1979, ‘Universalized Prescriptivism and Utilitarianism: Hare’s Attempted Forced Marriage’, Journal of Value Inquiry 13, 63–76.
McConnell, T. C: 1981, ‘Moral Absolutism and the Problem of Hard Cases’, Journal of Religious Ethics 9, 286–97.
McCormick, R. A.: 1981, ‘Marriage, Morality, and Sex-Change Surgery: A Catholic Perspective’, Hastings Center Report 11, 10–11.
Nielson, K.: 1987, ‘On Being Skeptical About Applied Ethics’, in T. Ackerman, G. Graber, C. Reynolds, and D. Thomasma (eds.), Clinical Medical Ethics: Exploration and Assessment, University Press of America, Lanham, Md., pp. 95–115.
Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Regis, E., Jr.: 1981, ‘Gewirth on Rights’, Journal of Philosophy 78, 786–95.
Scanlon, T. M.: 1982, ‘Contractualism and Utilitarianism’, in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 103–128.
Singer, P.: 1979, Practical Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Smart, J. J. C: 1973, ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’, in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–74.
Veatch, R.M.: 1981, A Theory of Medical Ethics, Basic Books, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strong, C. (1988). Justification in Ethics. In: Brody, B.A. (eds) Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2715-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2715-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7723-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2715-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive