Abstract
My object in this paper is to show how moralists working in the Kantian tradition go from their general moral principles to judgments in individual cases; and to do so by examining how they would proceed in an exemplary individual case. In an earlier paper [5] I attempted to exhibit the contemporary doctrine of informed consent in medical practice as an example of how moral precepts are arrived at in the Kantian tradition. In now attempting to explain how moral principles are applied in that same tradition, I have chosen an example that is more revealing than any I know of in medicine: President Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, its application is universal.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
“My sympathies are all in the wrong place, and I don’t like it [said Wimsey]. I know all about not doing evil that good may come. It’s doing good that evil may come that’s so embarrassing”.
“My dear boy”, said the Rector, “it does not do for us to take too much thought for the morrow. It is better to follow the truth and leave the result in the hand of God. He can foresee where we cannot…” Dorothy L. Sayers, The Nine Tailors
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1981, The Collected Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe. Volume 3: Ethics, Religion, and Politics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Bunan, R.: 1986, ‘The Internal Politics of Biology and the Justification of Biological Theories’, in A. Donagan, A. N. Perovich, and M. Wedin (eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 23–45.
Davis, N.: 1984, ‘Using Persons and Common Sense’, Ethics 94, 387–406.
Davidson, D.: 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Donagan, A.: 1977, ‘Informed Consent in Therapy and Experimentation’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2, 307–329.
Donagan, A.: 1985, ‘The Structure of Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals’, Topoi 4, 61–72.
Hare, R. M.: 1981, Moral Thinking, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Harper, S.: 1985, The Miracle of Deliverance, Sidgwick and Johnson, London.
Howard, M.: 1985, review of S. Harper, The Miracle of Deliverance, in Times Literary Supplement, Aug. 9, 869–870.
Kant, L: 1911–1914, Gesammelte Schriften, Bände 4, 5, 6, Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed.), Georg Reimer, Berlin.
Kant, L: 1923, Gesammelte Schriften, Band 8, Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
Kant, L: 1786, Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten, Second Edition, J. F. Hartnock, Riga.
Kant, L: 1949, Immanuel Kant: The Critique of Practical Reason and other Writings in Moral Philosophy, L. W. Beck (tr.), University of Chicago, Chicago.
Kant, I.: 1964, Kant: The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, J. Ladd (tr.), Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
Kant, I.: 1965, Kant: The Metaphysical Principles of Virtue, J. Ellington (tr.), Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
Kant, I.: 1788, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, First Edition, J. F. Hartnock, Riga.
Kant, L: 1789, Metaphysik der Sitten, Second Edition, F. Nicolovius, Königsberg, 2 volumes.
Kant, L: 1983, Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History and Morals, T. Humphrey (ed.), Hackett, Indianapolis.
Maclntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue, Second Edition, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Marshall, S. L. A.: 1985, World War I, American Heritage, New York.
McKenna, J. C: 1960, ‘Ethics and War: a Catholic View’, American Political Science Review 54, 647–658.
McKenna, J.C.: 1979, ‘Ethics in War’, in J. Rachels (ed.), Moral Problems, Third Edition, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 382–392.
Rationality and Morality’ (symposium): 1985, Ethics 96, 5–158.
Scheffler, S.: 1985, ‘Agent-Centred Restrictions, Rationality and the Virtues’, Mind 94, 409–419.
Scheffler, S.: 1982, The Rejection of Consequentialism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Sidgwick, H.: The Methods of Ethics, Seventh Edition, MacMillan, London.
Walzer, M.: 1977, Just and Unjust Wars, Basic Books, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donagan, A. (1988). The Relation of Moral Theory to Moral Judgments: A Kantian Review. In: Brody, B.A. (eds) Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2715-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2715-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7723-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2715-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive