Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 31))

Abstract

It was mainly in view of two developments that, in 1968, an Ad Hoc Committee was formed at Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of death as involving “brain death” ([1], p. 337). On the one hand, “improvements in resuscitative and supportive measures have led to increased efforts to save those who are desperately injured.” At times, these efforts were only partially successful, with the result that an individual could be left with circulation and respiration (at times, but not always, artifically supported), but whose brain was irreversibly damaged. On the other hand, obsolete criteria for the diagnosis of death could lead to controversy in obtaining organs for transplantation, which had already become sufficiently developed to challenge those criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Death: 1968, ‘A Definition of Irreversible Coma’, Journal of the American Medical Association 205, 337–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett, E. T. and Youngner, S. J.: 1988, ‘Does Anyone Survive Neocortical Death?’, this volume, pp. 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernat, J. L., Culver, C. M., and Gert, G.: 1981, ‘On the Definition and Criterion of Death’, Annals of Internal Medicine 94, 389–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Capron, A. M.: 1988, ‘The Report of the President’s Commission on the Uniform Determination of Death Act’, this volume, pp. 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  5. President’s Commission for the Study of.Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1981, Defining Death: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Puccetti, R.: 1988, ‘Neocortical Definitions of Death and Philosophical Concepts of Persons’, this volume, pp. 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Veatch, R. M.: 1988, ‘Whole-Brain and Higher Brain Related Concepts of Death’, this volume, pp. 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walton, D. N.: 1981, Brain Death: Ethical Considerations, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  9. White, P.: 1988, ‘Should the Law Define Death?, this volume, pp. 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zaner, R. M.: 1981, The Context of Self, Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zaner, R.M. (1988). Introduction. In: Zaner, R.M. (eds) Death: Beyond Whole-Brain Criteria. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2707-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2707-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7720-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2707-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics