Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the properties of optimal incentive schemes, and their implications, for accountants in a simple model of the accountant’s role in the production of information for a user. We find that a key property of the optimal incentive scheme for the accountant is its asymmetry: typically, the accountant will be penalized differently for different types of errors. This asymmetry has implications for the structure of auditors’ legal liability and for accountants’ preferences for conservative accounting practices.
Helpful comments by Sidney Davidson, Joel Demski, Nicholas Dopuch, Jerry Feltham, Froystein Gjesdal, and workshop participants at the University of Chicago, Cornell University, and New York University are gratefully acknowledged, as is the financial support of the Institute of Professional Accounting at the University of Chicago (Antle) and the Accounting Research Center of the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University (Lambert).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antle, R. [1982]. “The Auditor as an Economic Agent.” Journal of Accounting Research 20, 503–527.
Balachandran, B., and Ramakrishnan, R. [1982]. “A Theory of Large Audit Partnerships: Audit Firm Size and Fees.” Working Paper, Northwestern University.
Devine, C. [1963]. “The Rule of Conservatism Reexamined.” Journal of Accounting Research 1, 127–138.
Grossman, S., and Hart, O. [1983]. “An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem.” Econometrica 51, 7–45.
Harris, M., and Raviv, A. [1979]: “Optimal Incentive Contracts with Imperfect Information.” Journal of Economic Theory 20, 231–259.
Harris, M., and Townsend, R. [1981]. “Resource Allocation under Asymmetric Information.” Econometrica 49, 33–64.
Holmstrom, B. [1979]. “Moral Hazard and Observability.” Bell Journal of Economics 10, 74–91.
Magee, R. [1975]. “Discussion of Auditor’s Loss Functions Implicit in Consumption-Investment Models.” Journal of Accounting Research Supplement 13, 121–123.
Marschak, J., and Miyasawa, K. [1968]. “Economic Comparability of Information Systems.” International Economic Review 9, 137–174.
Myerson, R. [1979]. “Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 47, 61–73.
Scott, W. [1975]. “Auditor’s Loss Functions Implicit in Consumption-Investment Models.” Journal of Accounting Research Supplement 13, 91–117.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Antle, R., Lambert, R.A. (1988). Accountants’ Loss Functions and Induced Preferences for Conservatism. In: Feltham, G.A., Amershi, A.H., Ziemba, W.T. (eds) Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2667-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2667-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7702-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2667-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive