Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate some aspects of intrafirm resource allocation as accomplished through transfer pricing techniques. Existing theories of transfer prices have several deficiencies. In the traditional transfer pricing models, researchers have posited that central management possesses as much information about the production technologies of divisions as do the division managers themselves (see, e.g., Hirshleifer [1956], Gould [1964]). Given this assumption, central management, by specifying what quantities each division should produce, can achieve the same level of profits as can be achieved by taking the more circuitous, but equivalent, route of specifying the prices that will induce individual division managers to select these same quantities. Consequently, while traditional transfer pricing models identify the implicit prices of intrafirm transfers (which may have some intrinsic interest), these transfer prices need serve no allocational role, and so the failure to implement a transfer pricing scheme has no impact on firm profits in such models.
I would like to thank Joel Demski and Jerry Feltham for detailed comments and suggestions on a previous draft of this paper, and Stan Baiman for many illuminating discussions on transfer pricing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amershi, A. [1984]. “A Theory of Informativeness under Asymmetric Information.” Working Paper, University of British Columbia.
Antle, R. [1982]. “The Auditor as an Economic Agent.” Journal of Accounting Research 20, 503–527.
Baiman, S., and Evans, H. [1983]. “Pre-decision Information and Participative Management Control Systems.” Journal of Accounting Research 21, 371–395.
Christensen, J. [1981]. “Communication in Agencies.” Bell Journal of Economics 12, 661–674.
Christensen, J. [1982]. “The Determination of Performance Standards and Participation.” Journal of Accounting Research 20, 589–603.
Demski, J., and Sappington, D. [1985]. “Delegated Expertise.” Working Paper, Yale University.
Dye, R. [1983]. “Communication and Post-Decision Information.” Journal of Accounting Research 21, 514–533.
Gould, J.R. [1964]. “Internal Pricing in Firms When There Are Costs of Using An Outside Market.” Journal of Business 37, 61–67.
Harris, M., Kriebel, C, and Raviv, A. [1982]. “Asymmetric Information, Incentives, and Intrafirm Resource Allocation.” Management Science 28, 604–620.
Hirshleifer, J. [1956]. “On the Economics of Transfer Pricing.” Journal of Business 29, 172–184.
Laffont, J. [1977]. “More on Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 44, 177–182.
Lehman, E. [1959]. Testing Statistical Hypotheses. New York: Wiley.
Lucas, R. [1972]. “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 4, 103–124.
Melumad, N., and Reichelstein, S. [1985]. “Centralization versus Delegation and the Value of Communication.” Working Paper, Stanford University.
Penno, M. [1984]. “Asymmetry of Pre-decision Information and Management Accounting.” Journal of Accounting Research 22, 177–191.
Weitzmann, M. [1977a]. “Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 44, 477–491.
Weitzmann, M. [1977b]. “Is the Price System or Rationing More Effective in Getting a Commodity to Those Who Need It Most.” Bell Journal of Economics 8, 517–524.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dye, R.A. (1988). Intrafirm Resource Allocation and Discretionary Actions. In: Feltham, G.A., Amershi, A.H., Ziemba, W.T. (eds) Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2667-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2667-7_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7702-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2667-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive