Skip to main content

Intrafirm Resource Allocation and Discretionary Actions

  • Chapter
Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate some aspects of intrafirm resource allocation as accomplished through transfer pricing techniques. Existing theories of transfer prices have several deficiencies. In the traditional transfer pricing models, researchers have posited that central management possesses as much information about the production technologies of divisions as do the division managers themselves (see, e.g., Hirshleifer [1956], Gould [1964]). Given this assumption, central management, by specifying what quantities each division should produce, can achieve the same level of profits as can be achieved by taking the more circuitous, but equivalent, route of specifying the prices that will induce individual division managers to select these same quantities. Consequently, while traditional transfer pricing models identify the implicit prices of intrafirm transfers (which may have some intrinsic interest), these transfer prices need serve no allocational role, and so the failure to implement a transfer pricing scheme has no impact on firm profits in such models.

I would like to thank Joel Demski and Jerry Feltham for detailed comments and suggestions on a previous draft of this paper, and Stan Baiman for many illuminating discussions on transfer pricing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amershi, A. [1984]. “A Theory of Informativeness under Asymmetric Information.” Working Paper, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, R. [1982]. “The Auditor as an Economic Agent.” Journal of Accounting Research 20, 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S., and Evans, H. [1983]. “Pre-decision Information and Participative Management Control Systems.” Journal of Accounting Research 21, 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. [1981]. “Communication in Agencies.” Bell Journal of Economics 12, 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. [1982]. “The Determination of Performance Standards and Participation.” Journal of Accounting Research 20, 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J., and Sappington, D. [1985]. “Delegated Expertise.” Working Paper, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, R. [1983]. “Communication and Post-Decision Information.” Journal of Accounting Research 21, 514–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J.R. [1964]. “Internal Pricing in Firms When There Are Costs of Using An Outside Market.” Journal of Business 37, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Kriebel, C, and Raviv, A. [1982]. “Asymmetric Information, Incentives, and Intrafirm Resource Allocation.” Management Science 28, 604–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. [1956]. “On the Economics of Transfer Pricing.” Journal of Business 29, 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J. [1977]. “More on Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 44, 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, E. [1959]. Testing Statistical Hypotheses. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. [1972]. “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 4, 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melumad, N., and Reichelstein, S. [1985]. “Centralization versus Delegation and the Value of Communication.” Working Paper, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penno, M. [1984]. “Asymmetry of Pre-decision Information and Management Accounting.” Journal of Accounting Research 22, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzmann, M. [1977a]. “Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 44, 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzmann, M. [1977b]. “Is the Price System or Rationing More Effective in Getting a Commodity to Those Who Need It Most.” Bell Journal of Economics 8, 517–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dye, R.A. (1988). Intrafirm Resource Allocation and Discretionary Actions. In: Feltham, G.A., Amershi, A.H., Ziemba, W.T. (eds) Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2667-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2667-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7702-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2667-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics