Skip to main content

Abstract

The standard models of financial markets such as the Sharpe-Lintner mean-variance model or the Rubinstein-Breeden-Litzenberger contingent consumption model both assume more-or-less homogenous probability beliefs.1 There has been some work on extending the mean-variance model to allow for differences in beliefs across agents; see Jarrow (1980), Lintner (1969), Mayshar (1983), and Williams (1977). Differences in beliefs in contingent commodities models have received much less attention. The major references are Rubinstein (1975, 1976a), Breeden and Litzenberger (1978), Hakansson et al. (1982), and Milgrom and Stokey (1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aumann, R. (1976), “Agreeing to Disagree,” Annals of Statistics, 4, 1236–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. (1976), “Information Efficiency and Inter-temporal Rates of Return,” Sloan School mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. (1986), “Noise,” Journal of Finance, 41, 529–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breeden, D. (1979), “An Intertemporal Asset Pricing Model with Stochastic Consumption and Investment Opportunities,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 265–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breeden, D. and M. Litzenberger (1978), “Prices of State-Contingent Claims Implicit in Option Prices,” Journal of Business, 51, 621–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, J. and B. Malkiel (1982), Expectations and the Structure of Share Prices, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. and R. Verrecchia (1981), “Informational Aggregation in a Noisy Rational Expectations Economy,” Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epps, T. and M. Epps (1976), “The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture-of-Distribution Hypothesis,” Econometrica, 44, 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. (1976), “On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information,” The Journal of Finance, 31, 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. (1977), “The Existence of Futures Markets, Noisy Rational Expectations, and Informational Externalities,” Review of Economic Studies, 44, 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. (1978), “Further Results on the Informational Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets,” Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. and R. Shiller (1982), “Consumption Correlatedness and Risk Measurement in Economies with Non-Traded Assets and Heterogeneous Information,” Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. and J. Stiglitz (1980), “On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets,” American Economic Review, 70, 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, N., J. Kunkel, and J. Ohlson (1982), “Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for Information to have Social Value in Pure Exchange,” Journal of Finance, 37, 1169–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. (1983), “The Joint Distribution of Speculative Prices and of Daily Trading Volume,” University of Southern California Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1983), “Bayesian Decision Theory, Subjective and Objective Probabilities, and Acceptance of Empirical Hypotheses,” Synthese, 57, 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, M. (1980), “On the Aggregation of Information in Competitive Markets,” Journal of Economic Theory, 22, 477–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R. (1980), “Heterogeneous Expectations, Restrictions on Short Sales, and Equilibrium Asset Prices,” Journal of Finance, 35, 1105–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. (1985), “The Relationship between Stock Prices and Volume,” Center for the Study of Banking and Financial Markets Digest, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J. (1969), “The Aggregation of Investors’ Diverse Judgements and Preferences in Purely Competitive Markets,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 4, 347–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1974), “Private Incentives and Public Information,” American Economic Review, 64, 373–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayshar, J. (1983), “On Divergence of Opinion and Imperfections in Capital Markets,” American Economic Review, 73, 114–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1980), “On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market,” Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 323–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and N. Stokey (1982), “Information, Trade and Common Knowledge,” Journal of Economic Theory, 26, 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and J. Stiglitz (1970), “Increasing Risk I: A Definition,” Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, M. (1975), “Security Market Efficiency in an Arrow-Debreu Economy,” American Economic Review, 65, 812–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, M. (1976a), “The Strong Case for the Generalized Logarithmic Utility Model as the Premier Model of Financial Markets,” Journal of Finance, 31, 551–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, M. (1976b), “The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options,” Bell Journal of Economics, 7, 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. (1986), “Real Effects of Futures Speculation: Asymptotically Rational Expectations,” Economica, 53, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauchen, G. and M. Pitts (1983), “The Price Variability-Volume Relationship on Speculative Markets,” Econometrica, 51, 485–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1982), “On the Possibility of Speculation Under Rational Expectations,” Econometrica, 50, 1163–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1984), Microeconomic Analysis, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1985a), “Divergence of Opinion in Complete Markets,” Journal of Finance, 40(1), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1985b), “Observable Implications of Changes in Risk Aversion,” University of Michigan Working Paper. To appear in Econometrica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R. (1981), “On the Relationship between Volume Reaction and the Consensus of Investors: Implications for Interpreting Tests of Information Content,” Journal of Accounting Research, 19, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1977), “Capital Asset Prices with Heterogeneous Beliefs,” Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Varian, H.R. (1989). Differences of Opinion in Financial Markets. In: Stone, C.C. (eds) Financial Risk: Theory, Evidence and Implications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2665-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2665-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7701-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2665-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics