Advertisement

Alternative life-history styles in reptiles

  • William R. Branch
Part of the Perspectives in vertebrate science book series (PIVS, volume 6)

Synopsis

Reptiles are gonochorists (with the exception of a few parthenogenetic lizards and a single snake) and have relatively few young. Hermaphroditism is absent, possibly due to the existence of internal fertilisation and the complexity of the associated genitalia. Environmental sex determination (ESD) is known in 2 lizards, most chelonians and all crocodilians so far studied. Its significance is obscure. Previous explanations, based on presumed selective advantages of sex-related hatchling size differences, seem improbable due to both groups slow attainment of sexual maturity. It is proposed that a more likely advantage is the ability to produce highly skewed sex ratios by behavioural selection for nesting site choice. Both orders are the most fecund reptiles and suffer high juvenile mortality. The direction of sex determination differs between crocodilians and chelonians (high incubation temperatures produce males and females, respectively.) The evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes has occurred independently many times in squamates, and in one chelonian, and this may be correlated with the undesirability of ESD in short-lived species with low fecundity. Parental care is almost completely absent, reaching its highest expression among crocodilians and certain anguid lizards. All young, including those of species showing parental care, are precocial and immediately feed exogenously. The absence of altricial young is possibly due to the difficulty of food handling between adults and young. Viviparity is found only among squamates, where it has evolved independently on numerous occasions. Its evolution is usually associated with cold climates, although certain other traits (e.g. the possession of venom and/or the existence of maternal brooding) may serve as pre-adaptations. Analysis of the effects of size and phylogeny on patterns of co-variation in certain squamate life-history traits reveals that although many variables scale allometrically with body size, significant variation in clutch size and age at maturity remains at order, family and generic level. The size and mass of females and their clutches may vary between populations and years, reflecting phenotypic plasticity to proximate environmental factors. Relative Clutch Mass (RCM — the ratio of female body mass to clutch mass) is correlated with foraging mode and predator escape tactics in lizards (but not in snakes) and with reproductive mode (i.e. viviparity) in snakes.

Key words

Reproduction Neoteny Hermaphroditism Parthenogenesis Sex determination Parental care Viviparity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, G.J. 1987. The herpetofauna of municipal Durban: a biogeographical review. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Natal, Durban. 266 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Andren, C. & G. Nilson 1983. Reproductive tactics in an island population of adders, Vipera berus (L.), with a fluctuating food resource. Amphibia-Reptilia 4: 63–79.Google Scholar
  3. Bacci, G. 1965. Sex determination. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 306 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Ballinger, R.E. 1983. Life history variations, pp. 241–260. In: R. Huey, E.R. Pianka & T.W. Schoener (ed.) Lizard Ecology: Studies on a Model Organism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Benedict, F.G. 1932. The physiology of large reptiles with special reference to the heat production of snakes, tortoises, lizards and alligators. Carnegie Institute, Washington D.C. 425 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, J.F. & R. Shine. 1980. Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (Order Testudines). Oecologia 44: 185–191.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn, D.G. 1982. Evolutionary origins of viviparity in the Reptilia. 1. Sauria. Amphibia-Reptilia 3: 185–205.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, D.G. & H.E. Evans. 1986. Why are there no viviparous birds? Amer. Nat. 128: 165–190.Google Scholar
  9. Blackburn, D.G., L.J. Vitt and C.A. Beuchat. 1984. Eutherian-like reproductive specializations in a viviparous reptile. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81: 4860–4863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Branch, W.R. & H. Erasmus. 1984. Captive breeding of pythons in South Africa, including details of an interspecif ic hybrid (Python sebae natalensis X Python molurus bivitattus). J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr. 30: 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. Broadley, D.G. 1979. A field study of two sympatric ‘annual’ lizards (genus Ichnotropis) in Rhodesia. S. Afr. J. Zool. 14: 133–138.Google Scholar
  12. Bull, J. J. 1980. Sex determination in reptiles. Quart. Rev. Biol. 55: 3–21.Google Scholar
  13. Bull, J. J., R.G. Moon & J.M. Legler. 1974. Male heterogamety in kinosternid turtles (genus Staurotypus). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 13: 419–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bull, J.J. & R.C. Vogt. 1979. Temperature dependent sex determination in turtles. Science 206: 1186–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bull, J.J. & R.C. Vogt. 1981. Temperature-sensitive periods of sex determination in emydid turtles. J. exp. Zool. 218: 435–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bull, J.J., R.C. Vogt & M.G. Bulmer. 1982a. Heritability of sex ratios in turtles with environmental sex determination. Evolution 36: 333–341.Google Scholar
  17. Bull, J.J., R.C. Vogt & C.J. McCoy. 1982b. Sex determination in turtles: a geographic comparison. Evolution 36: 326–332.Google Scholar
  18. Bustard, H.R. 1986. Crocodilians. pp. 136–142. In: T. Halliday & K. Adler (ed.) Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians, George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  19. Case, T.J. 1978. Endothermy and parental care in terrestrial vertebrates. Amer. Nat. 112: 861–874.Google Scholar
  20. Charnov, E.L. & J. J. Bull. 1977. When is sex environmentally determined? Nature (Lond.). 266: 828–830.Google Scholar
  21. Cole, C.J. 1975. Evolution of parthenogenetic species in reptiles, pp. 340–355. In: R. Reinboth (ed.) Intersexuality in the Animal Kingdom, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  22. Congdon, J.D. & J.W. Gibbons. 1985. Egg components and reproductive characteristics of turtles: relationships to body size. Herpetologica 41: 194–205.Google Scholar
  23. Conover, D.O. 1984. Adaptive significance of temperature-dependent sex determination in a fish. Amer. Nat. 123: 297–313.Google Scholar
  24. Cooper, J.S. 1965. Notes on fertilization, the incubation period and hybridization in Lacerta. Brit. J. Herpetol. 3: 218–220.Google Scholar
  25. Cuellar, O. 1971. Reproduction and the mechanism of meiotic restitution in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus uniparens. J. Morph. 133: 139–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cuellar, O. & A.G. Kluge. 1972. Natural parthenogenesis in the gekkonid lizard Lepidodactylus lugubris. J. Genetics 61: 14–26.Google Scholar
  27. Devine, M.C. 1977. Copulatory plugs, restricted mating opportunities, and reproductive competition among male garter snakes. Nature (Lond.) 267: 345–346.Google Scholar
  28. Devine, M.C. 1984. Potential for sperm competition in reptiles: behavioural and physiological consequences, pp. 509–521. In: R.L. Smith (ed.) Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  29. Duellman, W.E. 1989. Alternative life-history styles of anuran amphibians: evolutionary and ecological inplications. pp. 101–126. In: M.N. Bruton (ed.) Alternative Life-History Styles of Animals, Perspectives in Vertebrate Science 6, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  30. Duellman, W.E. & L. Treub. 1986. Biology of amphibians. McGraw Hill, New York. 670 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Dunham, A.E. 1981. Populations in a fluctuating environment: the comparative population ecology of the iguanid lizards Sceloporus merriami and Urosaurus ornatus. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 158: 1–62.Google Scholar
  32. Dunham, A.E. & D.B. Miles. 1985. Patterns of co-variation in life history traits of squamate reptiles: the effects of size and phylogeny reconsidered. Amer. Nat. 126: 231–257.Google Scholar
  33. Evans, L.T. 1959. A motion picture study of maternal behaviour of the lizard Eumeces obsoletus Baird and Girard. Copeia 1959: 103–110.Google Scholar
  34. Ferguson, M.W.J. & T. Joanen. 1982. Temperature of incubation determines sex in Alligator mississippiensis. Nature (Lond.) 296: 850–853.Google Scholar
  35. Ferguson, M.W.J. & T. Joanen. 1983. Temperature-dependent sex determination in Alligatoi mississippiensis. J. Zool. 200: 143–177.Google Scholar
  36. Fitch, H.S. 1954. Life history and ecology of the five-lined skink, Eumeces fasciatus. Occ. Pap. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 8: 1–156.Google Scholar
  37. Fitch, H.S. 1970. Reproductive cycles in lizards and snakes. Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 52: 1–247.Google Scholar
  38. Fitch, H.S. 1981. Sexual size differences in reptiles. Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 70: 1–72.Google Scholar
  39. Fitch, H.S. 1982. Reproductive cycles in tropical reptiles. Occ. Pap. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 96: 1–53.Google Scholar
  40. Fitch, H.S. 1985. Variation in clutch and litter size in New World reptiles. Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 76: 1–76.Google Scholar
  41. Forbes, T.R. 1964. Intersexuality in reptiles, pp. 273–283. In: N. Armstrong & A.J. Marshall (ed.) Intersexuality in Vertebrates, Including Man, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Gardiner, B.G. 1982. Tetrapod classification. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 74: 207–232.Google Scholar
  43. Ghiselin, M.T. 1974. The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, Berkeley. 346 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Gibbons, J.W. 1970. Sex ratios in turtles. Res. Popul. Ecol. 12: 252–254.Google Scholar
  45. Gorman, G. 1973. The chromosomes of the Reptilia, a cytotaxonomic interpretation, pp. 349–424. In: A.B. Chiarelli & E. Capanna (ed.) Cytotaxonomy and Vertebrate Evolution, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Gould, S.J. & R.C. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marca and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 205: 581–598.Google Scholar
  47. Greene, H.W. 1986. Natural history and evolutionary biology, pp. 99–108. In: M.E. Feder & G.V. Lauder (ed.) Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  48. Greer, A.E. 1967. Notes on the mode of reproduction in anguid lizards. Herpetologica 23: 94–99.Google Scholar
  49. Greer, A.E. 1968. Mode of reproduction in the squamate faunas of three altitudinally correlated life zones in East Africa. Herpetologica 24: 229–232.Google Scholar
  50. Guillette, L.J. 1986. The evolution of egg retention in lizards: a physiological model, pp. 379–386. In: G. Grigg, R. Shine & H. Ehmann (ed.) Biology of Australasian Frogs and Reptiles, Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton.Google Scholar
  51. Gutzke, W.H.N. & G.L. Paukstis. 1983. Influence of the hydric environment on sexual differentiation of turtles. J. exp. Zool. 286: 467–469.Google Scholar
  52. Halliday, T. & K. Adler (ed.). 1986. The encyclopedia of reptiles and amphibians. George Allen & Unwin, London. 152 pp.Google Scholar
  53. Hardy, L.M. 1970. Intersexuality in a Mexican colubrid snake (Pseudoficimia). Herpetologica 26: 336–343.Google Scholar
  54. Hedges, S.B. 1986. The influence of size and phylogeny on life history variation in reptiles: a response to Stearns. Amer. Nat. 126: 258–260.Google Scholar
  55. Hildebrand, S.F. 1929. Review of experiments on artificial culture of diamond-backed terrapins. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fisher. 45: 25–70.Google Scholar
  56. Hoge, A.R., E. Belluomini, G. Schreiber & A.M. Penha. 1959. Sexual abnormalities in Bothrops insularis (Amaral 1921). Mem. Inst. Butanten 29: 17–88.Google Scholar
  57. Hughes, G.R. 1974. The sea turtles of south-east Africa. 2. The biology of the Tongaland loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta L. with comments on the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea L. and the green turtle Chelonia mydas L. in the study region. Invest. Rep. Ocean. Res. Inst. 36: 1–96.Google Scholar
  58. Hutton, J.M. 1987. Incubation temperatures, sex ratios and sex determination in a population of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus). J. Zool. 211: 143–155.Google Scholar
  59. Janeček, J. 1976. An exceptionally large puff adder brood at Dvurkralove Zoo. Int. Zoo Yearb. 16: 85–86.Google Scholar
  60. Jones, K.W. 1984. The evolution of sex chromosomes and chromosomal inactivation in reptiles and mammals. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 52: 305–316.Google Scholar
  61. King, M. 1977. The evolution of sex chromosomes in lizards, pp. 55–60. In: J. Calaby & H. Tynedale-Briscoe (ed.) Evolution and Reproduction, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.Google Scholar
  62. Limpus, C.J., V. Baker & J.D. Miller. 1979. A preliminary study of movement induced mortality of sea turtle eggs. Herpetologica 35: 335–338.Google Scholar
  63. Limpus, C.J., RC. Reed & J.D. Miller. 1985. Temperature dependent sex determination in Queensland sea turtles: intraspecific variation in Caretta caretta. pp. 343–351. In: G. Grigg, R. Shine & H. Ehmann (ed.) Biology of Australasian Frogs and Reptiles, Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton.Google Scholar
  64. McCoy, C.J., R.C. Vogt & E.J. Censky. 1983. Temperature-controlled sex determination in the sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea. J. Herpetol. 17: 404–406.Google Scholar
  65. McDowell, S.B. 1975. A catalogue of the snakes of New Guinea and the Solomons with special reference to those in the Bernice R Price Museum. Part 1., Scolecophidia. J. Herpetol. 8: 1–57.Google Scholar
  66. Mengden, G.A. & A.D. Stock. 1980. Chromosomal evolution in Serpentes; a comparison of G and C chromosome banding patterns of some colubrid and boid genera. Chromosoma 79: 53–64.Google Scholar
  67. Miller, J.D. & C.J. Limpus. 1981. Incubation period and sexual differentiation in the green turtle Chelonia mydas L. pp. 66–73. In: C.B. Banks & A.A. Martin (ed.) Proceedings of the Melbourne Herpetological Symposium, Zoological Board of Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  68. Moll, E.O. 1986. Turtles and tortoises, pp. 72–81. In: T. Halliday & K. Adler (ed.) Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians, George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  69. Moritz, C. & D. King. 1985. Cytogenetic perspectives on parthenogenesis in the Gekkonidae. pp. 327–337. In: G. Grigg, R. Shine & H. Ehmann (ed.) Biology of Australasian Frogs and Reptiles, Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton.Google Scholar
  70. Mrosovsky, N., S.R. Hopkins-Murphy & J.I. Richardson. 1984. Sex ratio of sea turtles: seasonal changes. Science 225: 739–741.Google Scholar
  71. Mrosovsky, N. & C.L. Yntema. 1980. Temperature dependence of sexual differentiation in sea turtles: implications for conservation practices. Biol. Conserv. 18: 271–280.Google Scholar
  72. Noble, G.K. & E.R. Mason. 1933. Experiments on the brooding habits of the lizards Eumeces and Ophiosaurus. Amer. Mus. Novit. 619: 1–29.Google Scholar
  73. Nussbaum, R.A. 1980. The Brahminy blind snake (Ramphotyphlops braminus) in the Seychelles archipelago: distribution, variation and further evidence for parthenogenesis. Herpetologica 36: 215–221.Google Scholar
  74. Ohno, S. 1967. Sex chromosomes and sex-linked genes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 192 pp.Google Scholar
  75. Ohno, S. 1979. Major sex-determining genes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 167 pp.Google Scholar
  76. Oliver, J.A. 1956. Reproduction in the king cobra, Ophiophagus hannah Cantor. Zoologica 41: 145–152.Google Scholar
  77. Packard, G.C., C.R. Tracy & J.J. Roth. 1977. The physiological ecology of reptilian eggs and embryos, and the evolution of viviparity within the class Reptilia. Biol. Rev. 52: 71–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Pianka, E.R. 1986. Ecology and natural history of desert lizards. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 208 pp.Google Scholar
  79. Pieau, C. 1971. Sur le proportion sexuelle chez les embryons de deux Cheloniens (Testudo graeca L. et Emys orbicularis L.) issus d’oeufs incubes artificiellement. C.R. Seances Acad. Sci. 272D: 3071–3074.Google Scholar
  80. Pieau, C., J. Fretey, F. Rimblot & J. Lescure. 1984. Influence de la temperature d’incubation des oeufs sur la differentiation sexuelle des tortues. Sun importance dans l’elevage des tortues. In: Maintenance and Reproduction of Reptiles in Captivity, Vol. 1, Acta Zool. Pathol Antwerp. 78: 277–296.Google Scholar
  81. Pooley, A.C. 1977. The nest opening response in the Nile crocodile Crocodylus niloticus. J. Zool. 182: 17–26.Google Scholar
  82. Pritchard, P.C.H. & P. Trebbau. 1984. The turtles of Venezuela. Contrib. Herpetol. 2, SSAR. 403 pp.Google Scholar
  83. Sachsse, W. 1984. Long-term studies of the reproduction of Malaclemys terrapin centrata. In: Maintenance and Reproduction of Reptiles in Captivity, Vol. 1, Acta Zool. Pathol. Antwerp 78: 297–308.Google Scholar
  84. Seigel, R.A. & H.S. Fitch. 1984. Ecological patterns of relative clutch mass in snakes. Oecologia 61: 293–301.Google Scholar
  85. Seigel, R.A. & H.S. Fitch. 1985. Annual variation in reproduction in snakes in a fluctuating environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 54: 497–505.Google Scholar
  86. Seigel, R.A., H.S. Fitch & N.B. Ford. 1986. Variation in relative clutch mass in snakes among and within species. Herpetologica 42: 179–185.Google Scholar
  87. Shine, R. 1978. Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia 33: 261–268.Google Scholar
  88. Shine, R. 1980. ‘Costs’ of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia 46: 92–100.Google Scholar
  89. Shine, R. 1983. Reptilian reproductive models: the oviparity-viviparity continuum. Herpetologica 39: 1–8.Google Scholar
  90. Shine, R. 1985. The evolution of viviparity in reptiles: an ecological analysis, pp. 675–710. In: C. Gans & F. Billet (ed.) Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 16, Reproduction, Wiley-Intersciences, New York.Google Scholar
  91. Shine, R. & J.F. Berry. 1978. Climatic correlates of live squamate reptiles. Oecologia 33: 261–268.Google Scholar
  92. Shine, R. & J.J. Bull. 1977. Skewed sex ratios in snakes. Copeia 1977: 228–234.Google Scholar
  93. Shine, R. & J.J. Bull. 1979. The evolution of live-bearing in lizards and snakes. Amer. Nat. 113:905–923.Google Scholar
  94. Sites, J.W. Jr., J.W. Bickham, M.W. Haiduk & J.B. Iverson. 1979. A derived X chromosome in the turtle genus Staurotypus. Science 206: 1410–1412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Smith, C.L. 1975. The evolution of hermaphroditism in fishes, pp. 295–310. In: R. Reinboth (ed.) Intersexuality in the Animal Kingdom, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, M.A. 1943. The fauna of British India. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. 3, Serpentes. 583 pp.Google Scholar
  97. Smith, M.A. 1973. The British amphibians and reptiles. 5th ed. Collins, London. 322 pp.Google Scholar
  98. Smith-Gill, S.J. 1983. Developmental plasticity: developmental constraints versus phenotypic plasticity. Amer. Zool. 23: 47–55.Google Scholar
  99. Stearns, S.C. 1976. Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Quart. Rev. Biol. 51: 3–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Stearns, S.C. 1984. The effects of size and phylogeny on patterns of co-variation in the life history traits of lizards and snakes. Amer. Nat. 123: 56–72.Google Scholar
  101. Swingland, I.R. 1977. Reproductive effort and life history strategy of the Aldabran giant tortoise. Nature (Lond.) 269: 402–403.Google Scholar
  102. Tinkle, D.W. & J.W. Gibbons. 1977. The distribution and evolution of viviparity in reptiles. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 154: 1–55.Google Scholar
  103. Vinegar, A.V. 1968. Brooding in the eastern glass lizard, Ophiosaurus ventralis. Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 67: 65–68.Google Scholar
  104. Vinegar, A.V, V. Hutchinson & H.D. Dowling. 1970. Metabolism, energetics, and thermoregulation during brooding of snakes of the genus Python (Reptilia: Boidae). Zoologica 55: 19–50.Google Scholar
  105. Vitt, L.J. 1986. Reproductive tactics of sympatric gekkonid lizards with a comment on the evolutionary and ecological consequences of invariant clutch size. Copeia 1986: 773–786.Google Scholar
  106. Vitt, L.J. & H.J. Price. 1982. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of relative clutch mass in lizards. Herpetologica 38: 237–255.Google Scholar
  107. Vitt, L.J. & R.A. Seigel. 1985. Life history traits of lizards and snakes. Amer. Nat. 125: 480–484.Google Scholar
  108. Vogt, R.C. & J.J. Bull. 1982a. Temperature controlled sex determination in turtles: ecological and behavioural aspects. Herpetologica 38: 156–164.Google Scholar
  109. Vogt, R.C. & J.J. Bull. 1982b. Genetic sex determination in the spiny soft-shell Trionyx spiniferus (Testudines: Trionychidae) (?) Copeia 1982: 699–700.Google Scholar
  110. Vogt, R.C. & J.J. Bull. 1984. Ecology of hatchling sex ratio in map turtles. Ecology 65: 582–587.Google Scholar
  111. Vogt, R.C., J.J. Bull, C.J. McCoy & T.W. Houseal. 1982. Incubation temperature influences sex determination in kinosternid turtles. Copeia 1982: 480–482.Google Scholar
  112. Wagner, E. 1980. Gecko husbandry and reproduction. In: Reproductive Biology and Diseases in Captive Reptiles, SSAR Monogr. 1: 115–117.Google Scholar
  113. Warner, R.R. 1978. The evolution of hermaphroditism and unisexuality in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates, pp. 77–101. In: E.S. Reese & J. Lighter (ed.) Contrasts in Behaviour, Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  114. Webb, G.J.W. & A.M.A. Smith. 1984. Sex ratio and survivorship in the Australian freshwater crocodile Crocodylus johnstoni. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 52: 319–355.Google Scholar
  115. Weekes, H.C. 1935. A review of placentation among reptiles, with particular regard to the function and evolution of the placenta. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 2: 626–645.Google Scholar
  116. White, M.J.D. 1973. Animal cytology and evolution. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 784 pp.Google Scholar
  117. White, M.J.D. 1978. Modes of speciation. Freeman, San Francisco. 349 pp.Google Scholar
  118. Wilhoft, D.C., E. Hotaling & P. Franks. 1983. Effects of temperature on sex determination in embryos of the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. J. Herpetol. 17: 38–42.Google Scholar
  119. Witschi, E. 1962. Sex reversal in animals and in man. Science in Progress, Yale University Press, New Haven, Ser. 12: 171–193.Google Scholar
  120. Wynn, A.H., C.J. Cole & A.J. Gardner. 1987. Apparent triploidy in the unisexual Brahminy blind snake, Ramphotyphlops braminus. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2868: 1–7.Google Scholar
  121. Yntema, C.L. 1976. Effects of incubation temperature on sexual differentiation in the turtle Chelydra serpentina. J. Morphol. 150: 453–462.Google Scholar
  122. Yntema, C.L. 1979. Temperature levels and periods of sex determination during incubation of eggs of Chelydra serpentina. J. Morphol. 159: 17–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Branch
    • 1
  1. 1.Port Elizabeth MuseumHumewoodSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations