Abstract
The subject of meaning is notoriously foggy and undeveloped; according to some thinkers, not a subject at all. Yet, no meaning, no language; and failure to understand meaning is failure to understand the human being himself. I do not have very much of an orderly nature to say about meaning or intension, for I am convinced that any thing remotely resembling a theory of meaning, given our present limited insights in linguistics and psychology, is risky and presumptuous. If ever there was a place from which to launch the most irresponsible metaphysics, this is it. So I am somewhat hesitant about putting forth the position that the path to it is by way of intentionality. Yet we can make sense of mental attitudes and purpose to some extent in terms of expectations and so back to computational systems. What I hope to do is indicate (not even sketch) a kind of theory based on acceptance, in a manner parallel to the treatment of truth in the previous chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nelson, R.J. (1989). Toward Meaning. In: The Logic of Mind. Synthese Library, vol 155. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2595-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2595-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2822-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2595-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive