Zeta Function Regularization and Effective Action in Curved Spacetime
In most quantum field theories (QFTs), we encounter irritating problems of divergences. Several techniques have been developed in the past to separate out a finite ‘physically sensible’ part from the divergent mess. The mess is usually absorbed into the theory by a suitable renormalization of the coupling constants. Over the years, a number of elaborate methods have been developed to carry out this procedure. Simple normal ordering which removes a divergent zero point energy in flat spacetime cannot be justified in general relativity. Unlike in the flat spacetime case, the absolute value of energy does have a meaning in general relativity. To be honest, although methods like mode-sum cutoff, De Witt-Schwinger proper time expansion of the Green’s function, adiabatic regularization, covariant point splitting, dimensional regularization, etc., are a lot more than mere psychaedelic sounding expressions, I personally am very biased and committed to the use of the zeta function regularization scheme. This bias is perhaps due to my own subjective notion of elegance and compactness that this scheme offers.
KeywordsScalar Field Analytic Continuation Zeta Function Vacuum Energy Riemann Zeta Function
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, CUP, Cambridge (1940).Google Scholar
- 2.C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, McGraw-Hill, Singapore (1985).Google Scholar
- 3.N. D. Birell and P.C.W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, CUP, Cambridge (1982).Google Scholar
- 5.S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D7, 788 (1973).Google Scholar