Abstract
Fr. Wallace has come out with both guns blazing. He has an extraordinary capacity for sketching the big picture. He did not fail us here. Setting out for himself the task of integrating ancient, medieval, and modern science as the basis for a new philosophy of human nature, he would undergird a modern Catholic medical morality. At one point in his essay he cautions that “one must know the history of science down to the present, and be able to evaluate it critically, to judge what has been transient and ephemeral and what will retain lasting importance for future ages” ([11], p. 25). I can think of no one better able to match these abilities in Catholic circles than Fr. Wallace. But he wisely cautions: “And the person who embarks on this enterprise must be prepared to be contradicted at every turn along the way” ([11], p. 25). This is, indeed, the case in any interdisciplinary and systematic effort like his.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Ellos, William, S.J.: 1986, ‘Sociobiology and Structuralist Ethics’, in J. Wind and V. Reynolds (eds.), Essays in Human Sociobiology, V.U.B. Study Series No. 26, Brussels, Vol. 2, pp. 9–16.
Jung, C.J.: 1970, Psychological Reflections, Jolande Jacobi (ed.), Bolligen Series 21, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Lynne, Joanne (ed.): 1986, By No Extraordinary Means, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Maclntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, Ind.
Meeting of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences: 1985, ‘Ethical, Medical and Legal Questions on the Artificial Prolongation of Life’, Declaration adopted by scientists, L’Observatore Romano, Nov. 11, p. 10.
Ortegay Gasset, J.: 1960, What is Philosophy?, Norton, New York.
Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D.C.: 1988, For the Patient’s Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Medicine, Oxford University Press, New York.
Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D.C: 1981, A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford University Press, New York.
Schillebeeckx, E.: 1969, God, the Future of Man, Sheed and Ward, New York.
Wallace, William A.: 1984, ‘The Intelligibility of Nature: A Neo-Aristotelian View’, Review of Metaphysics 38, 33–56.
Wallace, William A.: 1989, ‘Nature and Human Nature as the Norm in Medical Ethics’, in this volume, pp. 23–53.
Wallace, William A.: 1985, ‘Nature as Animating: The Soul in the Human Sciences’, The Thomist 49, 612–648.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomasma, D.C. (1989). The Human Person and Philosophy of Medicine: A Response to William A. Wallace. In: Pellegrino, E.D., Langan, J.P., Harvey, J.C. (eds) Catholic Perspectives on Medical Morals. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2538-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2538-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7647-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2538-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive