Skip to main content

American Manufacturing in the 1990s: The Adjustment Challenge

  • Chapter
American Manufacturing in a Global Market

Abstract

In the 1990s, U.S. manufacturing will be heavily affected by two developments which have already played a major role in U.S. industrial performance in the 1980s. The first development is the shift in U.S. spending patterns from a nation living within its means to a nation living beyond them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Survey of Current Business, May 1988, p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Z. Lawrence and Robert E. Litan, “The Protectionist Prescription: Errors in Diagnosis and Cure,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1:1987, p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bela Balassa and Carol Balassa, “Industrial Protection in the Developed Countries,” World Economy, vol. 7 (June 1984), pp. 179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, Ralph С. Bryant, Gerald Holtham and Peter Hooper (eds.), External Deficits and the Dollar: The Pit and the Pendulum (Brookings Institution, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. An early example of this argument is provided in Hendrik S. Houthaker and Stephen P. Magee, “Income and Price Elasticities in World Trade,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 5 (May 1969), pp. 111–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. More recently, see Paul R. Krugman and Richard E. Baldwin, “The Persistence of the U.S. Trade Deficit,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1:1987, pp. 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robert Z. Lawrence, “Threats to American Living Standards,” in Robert Z. Lawrence and Robert E. Litan, eds., American Living Standards: Threats and Challenges (Brookings, 1988). The impact on living standards is the percentage decline in the terms of trade times the share of trade in GNP, which is about 10 percent.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fortune, July 18, 1988, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. In the case of manufactured goods, price elasticities are higher. Even with price elasticities of 1.5, starting from a position of balanced trade, three quarters of the turnaround resulting from higher foreign prices would occur through increased export earnings and one quarter from lower import values.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kenneth A. Froot, “Multinational Corporations, Exchange Rates and Direct Investment,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Conference on International Policy Coordination and Exchange Rate Fluctuations, October 27–29, 1988, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Paul R. Krugman, “U.S. External Adjustment,” MIT (mimeo), background paper prepared for Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, November 3, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. And Peter Hooper, “Exchange Rates and U.S. External Adjustment in the Short Run and the Long Run,” Brookings Discussion Papers in International Economics, No. 65, October, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Peter Hooper and Kathryn Larin, “International Comparisons of Labor Costs in Manufacturing,” Federal Reserve Board Discussion Paper No. 330,1988, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Ralph C. Bryant, “The U.S. External Deficit”: An Update, “Brookings Discussion Papers in international Economics,” No. 63, January 1988, table 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. “Medium Term Prospects for the U.S. External Current Account,” mimeo 1988. See also Nigel Gault, “Implications of Present Policies: The U.S. Current Account: A Baseline Analysis,” in Alfred Reifman and Craig Elwell, eds., The Dollar and the Trade Deficit: What’s to be Done?, Congressional Research Service Report 88–430E, June 7,1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Robert Z. Lawrence, “U.S. Living Standards: The International Dimension,” Living Standards: Threats and Challenges, chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edward F. Denison, “Estimates of Productivity Change by Industry: An Evaluation and an Alternative,” Brookings Institution, (mimeo) 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawrence R. Mishel, Manufacturing Numbers: How Inaccurate Statistics Conceal U.S. Industrial Decline, Economic Policy Institute, Washington D.C., April 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawrence, R. (1990). American Manufacturing in the 1990s: The Adjustment Challenge. In: Chilton, K.W., Warren, M.E., Weidenbaum, M.L. (eds) American Manufacturing in a Global Market. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2516-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2516-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7636-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2516-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics