What are General Equilibrium Theories?
A little philosophy of science can be a troubling thing. Simplified treatments of philosophy of science maintain that scientists formulate generalizations or theories, derive implications from them, and retain these generalizations or theories (albeit with some caution) as long as they pass the experimental tests. This story is heavily oversimplified, and its general inadequacies are familiar and shall not be repeated here. But this story is both well-known and a simplification of a truth, not mere error.
KeywordsGeneral Equilibrium Marginal Utility Utility Theory Real Economy Competitive Equilibrium
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arrow, K. and F. Hahn (1971) General Competitive Analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
- Blaug, M. (1980) The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bliss, C. (1975) Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1953) “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” pp. 3–43 of Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Green, E. (1981) “On the Role of Fundamental Theory in Positive Economics,” pp. 5–15 of J. Pitt, ed. Philosophy in Economics. Dordrect: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Hausman, D. (1981a) “Are General Equilibrium Theories Explanatory?” pp. 17–32 of J. Pitt, ed. Philosophy in Economics. Dordrect: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Hausman, D. (1981b) Capital, Profits and Prices: An Essay in the Philosophy of Economics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Hausman, D. (1982 unpublished) “The Conceptual Structure of Neoclassical Economics,” address at the 1982 meetings of the American Economic Association.Google Scholar
- Hempel, C. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Koopmans, T. (1957) Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Malinvaud, E. (1972) Lectures on Microeconomic Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Mill. J.S. (1843) A System of Logic, rpt. London: Longmans Green & Co., 1949.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, A. (1983) “If Economics Isn’t a Science: What Is It?” Philosophical Forum 14:296–314.Google Scholar
- Weintraub, E.R. (1985b) General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar