Abstract
We review the axiomatic foundations of subjective utility theory with a view toward understanding the implications of each axiom. We consider three different approaches, namely, the construction of utilities in the presence of canonical probabilities, the construction of probabilities in the presence of utilities, and the simultaneous construction of both probabilities and utilities. We focus attention on the axioms of independence and weak ordering. The independence axiom is seen to be necessary in order to prevent a form of Dutch Book in sequential problems.
Our main focus is to examine the implications of not requiring the weak order axiom. We assume that gambles are partially ordered. We consider both the construction of probabilities when utilities are given and the construction of utilities in the presence of canonical probabilities. In the first case we find that a partially ordered set of gambles leads to a set of probabilities with respect to which the expected utility of a preferred gamble is higher than that of a dispreferred gamble. We illustrate some comparisons with theories of upper and lower probabilities. In the second case, we find that a partially ordered set of gambles leads to a set of lexicographic utilities each of which ranks preferred gambles higher than dispreferred gambles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allais, M. (1979) “The So-Called Allais Paradox and Rational Decisions Under Uncertainty,” in Allais and Hagen (eds.) Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel: Dordrecht.
Anscombe, F.J. and Aumann, R.J. (1963) “A definition of subjective probability,” Annals of Math. Stat, 34, 199–205.
Aumann, R.J. (1962) “Utility theory without the completeness axiom,” Econometrica, 30, 445–462.
Aumann, R.J. (1964) “Utility theory without the completeness axiom: a correction,” Econometrica, 32, 210–212.
Bell, D. and Raiffa, H. (1979) “Decision Regret: A Component of Risk Aversion,” MS., Harvard University.
Chew Soo Hong and MacCrimmon, K.R. (1979) “Alpha-Nu choice theory: a generalization of expected utility theory,” working paper, University of British Columbia.
Cox, D.R. (1958) “Some Problems Connected with Statistical Inference,” Annals of Math, Stat., 29, 357–363.
deFinetti, B. (1937) “La prevision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives,” Annals de l’Institut Henri Poincare, 7, 1–68.
Fishburn, P.C. (1970) Utility Theory for Decision Making. Kriefer Publishing Co.: N.Y.
Fishburn, P.C. (1981) “An Axiomatic Characterization of Skew-Symmetric Bilinear Functionals, with applications to utility theory,” Economic Letters, 8, 311–313.
Fishburn, P.C. (1983) “Nontransitive Measurable Utility,” J. Math. Psych., 26, 31–67.
Good, I.J. (1952) “Rational Decisions,” J. Royal Stat. Soc. B, 14, 107–114.
Hausner, M. (1954) “Multidimensional utilities,” in R.M. Thrall, C.H. Coombs, and R.L. Davis (eds.), Decision processes. Wiley: N.Y.
Herstein, I.N. and Milnor, J. (1953) “An axiomatic approach to measurable utility,” Econometrica, 21, 291–297.
Jeffreys, H. (1971) Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Kadane, J. and Sedransk, N. (1980) “Toward a More Ethical Clinical Trial,” Bayesian Statistics. Bernardo et al (eds.) University Press: Valencia.
Kadane, J., et al (1990) A New Design for Clinical Trials. Wiley: forthcoming.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Kannai, Y. (1963) “Existence of a utility in infinite dimensional partially ordered spaces,” Israel J. of Math., 1, 229–234.
Klee, V.L. (1955) “Separation Properties of Convex Cones,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 6, 313–318.
Levi, I. (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities,” J. Phil., 71, 391–418.
Levi, I. (1980) The Enterprise of Knowledge, MIT Press: Cambridge.
Levi, I. (1986) “The Paradoxes of Allais and Ellsberg,” Economics and Philosophy, 2, 23–53.
Lindley, D.V. (1972) Bayesian Statistics: A Review. SIAM: Philadelphia.
Loomes, G. and Sudgen, R. (1982) “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty,” Economic J., 92, 805–824.
McClennen, E.F. (1983) “Sure Thing Doubts,” in B. Stigum and F. Wenstop (eds.), Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications. D. Reidel: Dordrecht.
Machina, M. (1982) “‘Expected Utility’ Analysis Without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica, 50, 277–323.
Machina, M. (1983) “The Economic Theory of Individual Behavior Toward Risk: Theory, Evidence and New Directions,” Dept. of Economics, U.C.S.D.: San Diego, CA 92093. Tech. Report #433.
Ramsey, F.P. (1931) “Truth and Probability,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and other essays. Keg an, Paul, Trench, Trubner, and Co. Ltd.: London.
Samuelson, P. (1950) “Probability and the Attempts to Measure Utility,” Economic Review, 1, 167–173.
Savage, L.J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley: N.Y.
Schick, F. (1984) Having Reasons. Princeton Univ. Press: Princeton.
Seidenfeld, T. (1988) “Decision Theory without Independence or Without Ordering, What is the difference?” with discussion, Economics and Philosophy, 4, 267–315.
Sen, A.K. (1977) “Social Choice Theory: A Re-examination,” Econometrica, 45, 53–89.
Shimony, A. (1955) “Coherence and the axioms of probability,” J. Symbolic Logic, 20, 1–28.
Smith, C.A.B. (1961) “Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision,” J. Royal Stat. Soc.B, 23, 1–25.
Szpilrajn, E. (1930) “Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel,” Fundamenta Mathematicae, 16, 386–389.
Suppes, P. (1974) “The Measurement of Belief,” J. Royal Stat. Soc. B, 36, 160–175.
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton Univ. Press: Princeton.
Walley, P. and Fine, T. (1979) “Varieties of modal (classificatory) and comparative probability,” Synthese, 41, 321–374.
Wolfenson, M. and Fine, T. (1982) “Bayes-like decision making with upper and lower probabilities,” J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 77, 80–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seidenfeld, T., Schervish, M.J., Kadane, J.B. (1990). Decisions Without Ordering. In: Sieg, W. (eds) Acting and Reflecting. Synthese Library, vol 211. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2476-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2476-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7617-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2476-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive