Skip to main content

Prediction of Preference Reversals by the Linearized Moments Model

  • Chapter
  • 326 Accesses

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLA,volume 11))

Abstract

Both in experimental and in theoretical contexts, it is often the case that two or more decision problems are at first sight equivalent to the decision analyst. It is noted that in the case of “preference reversals” the choice problems may not be equivalent. A careful description of the problem in terms of decision trees is suggested.

The empirical observations in preference reversal experiments may be predicted by the linearized moments model (LMM). The LMM contains transitive preferences, but not the substitution principle of expected utility theory. This places the LMM and the EURDP model (expected utility with rank dependent probability) in the same class. Some advantages of the LMM are noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1985). Nontransitive preference theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 32, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, O. (1972). A new axiomatization of utility under risk. Teorie a Metoda, 4 (2), 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kami, E., & Safra, Z. (1987). “Preference reversal” and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica, 55, 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindman, H.R. (1971). Inconsistent preferences among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 390–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1983). A rationale for preference reversal. American Economic Review, 73, 428–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munera, H.A. (1978). Modeling of individual risk attitudes in decision making under uncertainty: An application to nuclear power. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munera, H.A. (1985a). The generalized means model (GMM) for non-deterministic decision making: Its normative and descriptive power, including sketch of the representation theorem. Theory and Decision, 18, 173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munera, H.A. (1985b). A theory for technological risk comparisons. In: G. Yadigaroglu & S. Chakraborty (Eds.), Risk analysis as a decision tool, pp. 14–58. Cologne: Verlag TÜV Rheinland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munera, H.A. (1986). The generalized means model (GMM) for non-deterministic decision making: A unified treatment for the two contending theories. In: L. Daboni, A. Montesano, & M. Lines (Eds.), Recent developments in the foundations of utility and risk theory, pp. 161–184. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munera, H.A. (1988). A large scale empirical test for the linearized moments model (LMM): Compatibility between theory and observation. In: B.R. Munier (Ed.), Risk, decision, and rationality, pp. 291–311. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1983). Preference reversals: A broader perspective. American Economic Review, 73, 596–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • v. Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munera, H.A. (1989). Prediction of Preference Reversals by the Linearized Moments Model. In: Grunert, K.G., Ölander, F. (eds) Understanding Economic Behaviour. Theory and Decision Library, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2470-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2470-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7614-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2470-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics