Skip to main content

Cohort cultures of Tubifex tubifex forms

  • Conference paper
Aquatic Oligochaete Biology

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 51))

Abstract

By means of cohort cultures at different temperatures, the life cycles of two sympatric forms of T tubifex have been compared: the normal T. tubifextubifex’ and the ‘blanchardi’forms. Although the two forms have certain basic similarities, the ‘blanchardi’ form tolerated low temperatures less well, requiring a longer time to develop to maturity and producing fewer ova. The threshold temperature for development appeared to be around 8 °C, notably higher than for the normal form around 0 °C. Moreover, for the ‘blanchardi’ form, resistance was lower and mortality higher for embryos and throughout the life cycle. Cross-breeding tests were carried out, along with cultures of individuals serving as controls for partheno-genetic activity. In cross-breeding, pairs produced progeny similar to the normal form only, most likely derived not from eggs fertilized by the partner, but from parthenogenetic eggs. As a matter of fact, only the normal form was able to reproduce through parthenogenesis. Thus, the two forms have remarkable differences, indicating genetic differences, and they may be considered not as forms, but rather as distinct species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adreani, L., C. Bonomi & C. Monti, 1984. Cohort cultures of Psammory ctides barbatus (Grube) and Spirosperma ferox Eisen: a tool for a better understanding of demographic strategies in tubificids. Hydrobiologia 115: 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adreani, L. & G. Bonomi, 1980. Some observations on a population dynamics of tubificid worms. Proc. Third Congr. Italian Association Oceanol. Limnol.: 355–366 (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aston, R. J., 1973. Field and experimental studies on the effects of a power station on Tubificidae (Oligochaeta, Annelida). Hydrobiologia 42: 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birtwell, I. K. & D. R. Arthur, 1980. The ecology of tubificids in the Thames estuary with particular reference to Tubifex costatus (Claparède). In R. O. Brinkhurst & D. G. Cook (eds) Aquatic Oligochaete Biology, Plenum Press, New York: 331–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacina, C., G. Bonomi & C. Monti, 1987. Progress in cohort cultures of aquatic Oligochaeta. Hydrobiologia 155: 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi, G. & G. Di Cola, 1980. Population dynamics of Tubifex tubifex, studied by means of a new model. In R. O. Brinkhurst & D. G. Cook (eds) Aquatic Oligochaete Biology, Plenum Press, New York: 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O. & B. G. M. Jamieson, 1971. Aquatic Oligochaeta of the world. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. 860 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernositov, L., 1927. Die Selbstbefruchtung bei den Oligo-chaeten. Biol. Zbl. 47: 587–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, P. M. & R. O. Brinkhurst, 1987. Hair today, gone tommorow: induced chaetal changes in tubificied oligo-chaetes. Hydrobiologia 155: 45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilov, K., 1935. Contribution à l’étude de l’autoféconda-tion chez les Oligochaètes. Acta zool., Stockh. 16: 21–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giani, N. & E. Martinez-Ansemil, 1981. Contribution à la connaissance des Oligochètes aquatiques du bassin de l’Argent (Var, France). Ann. Limnol. 17(2): 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrabe, S., 1931. Uber eine neue Tubificiden-Gattung Epirodrilus (Oligochaeta) nebst Beitragen zur Kenntnis von Tubifex blanchardi. Zool. Anz. 93: 309–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosiorek, D., 1974. Development cycle of Tubifex tubifex Müller in experimental culture. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 21: 411–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loden, M. S. & W. J. Harman, 1980. Ecophenotypic variation in setae of Naididae (Oligochaeta). In R. O. Brinkhurst & D. G. Cook (eds), Aquatic Oligochaete Biology. Plenum Press. New York: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchese, M., 1987. The ecology of some benthic Oligochaeta from Parana River, Argentina. Hydrobiologia 155: 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1970. Population, species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrink, G., 1983. Characteristic deformities in tubificid oligochaetes inhabiting polluted bays on Lake Vanern, Southern Sweden. Hydrobiologia 106: 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monti, C., 1987. Population regulation in Psammoryctides barbatus Grube (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae). Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 44: 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morev, Yu. B., 1983. Parthenogenesis in Limnodrilus udekemianus and Tubifex tubifex (Oligochaeta). In: B. E. Kurashvili (ed.), Aquatic Oligochaeta. Proceedings of the Fourth All-Union Symposium, Tiblisi (U.S.S.R.): 69–75 (translated from Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, K. V., 1966. Checklist of freshwater Oligochaeta of the Indian subcontinent and Tibet. Hydrobiologia 27: 208–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, A. & C. Rusconi, 1985. Preliminary data on the biology of a tubificid community in a small stream. S. It. E. Atti 5: 277–280 (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poddubnaya, T. L., 1980. Independence of the species Tubifex bergi Hrabe (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) from Lake Issyk-Kul. Tr. Inst. Biol. Unutr. Vod. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. 41: 41–52 (translated from Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poddubnaya, T. L. 1987. Parthenogenesis in Tubificidae. Hydrobiologia 115:97–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E., 1985. Setal morphology and its intraspecific variation in Dero digitata and D. nivea (Oligochaeta, Naididae) Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc. 104: 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, C., 1980. A new view of life-history evolution. Oikos 35: 266–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, S., 1931. Reports on a expedition to Brazil and Paraguay in 1926–27. The Oligochaeta. J. Linn. Soc. 37: 291–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timm, T., 1974. On the life cycle of the aquatic Oligochaeta in aquaria. Inst. Zool. and Botany Acad. Sciences of Estonian SSR Hydrobiological Investigations 6: 97–118 (translated from Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vejdovsky, F., 1891. Note sur un Tubifex d’Algerie. Mem. Soc. Zool. de France 4: 596–603.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

J. L. Kaster

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paoletti, A. (1989). Cohort cultures of Tubifex tubifex forms. In: Kaster, J.L. (eds) Aquatic Oligochaete Biology. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2393-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2393-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7577-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2393-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics