Coherence and the Truth Connection: A reply to my critics
To reply to the interesting articles in this volume, I shall need to supply a brief summary of my views specifically designed to meet the objections contained in these articles. I defend a coherence theory of justification which I have modified and, I believe, improved since the publication of Knowledge, though the main ideas have remained constant. I define a notion of justification based on a background system, what I now call anacceptance system of a person at a time. To say that a person accepts that p, crudely reformulated, is to say that he is in a certain kind of functional state which typically arises when a person reflectively judges that p with the objective of judging that p if and only if p. The functional role of the state is manifested in thought, inference and action. Though such a functional state may arise from reflective judgment, it most often arises unreflectively. I shall say more about what acceptance amounts to subsequently when discussing the article by Bender and Davis.
KeywordsAcceptance System Present Circumstance Coherence Theory Skeptical Hypothesis Reflective Judgment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.