Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 44))

Abstract

The method of reflective equilibrium aims to maximize two factors in one’s beliefs: harmonious coherence, and plausibility of content.1 Analytic philosophy has long paid deference to these factors, for instance in its use of the counterexample, which attacks a principle as incoherent with the plausible (by one’s lights). A critique of this tradition has recently appeared, and it shall be my main objective here to assess its merits. An appendix will apply our results to issues of moral relativism and rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chisholm, Roderick. Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1st ed., 1966;

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick. Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 2nd ed., 1977;

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick. Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 3rd ed., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Norman. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics,” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979), 256–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaul, Michael. “Reflective Equilibrium and Foundationalism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1986), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, Phillippa. “Morality and Art,” Henrietta Hertz Lecture, Proceedings of the British Academy LVI, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 3rd edition. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. “The Independence of Moral Theory,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, (1974–75), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. “Replies to my Critics,” in The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Paul Schilpp, ed., Illinois: Open Court. 1974, Vol. II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shope, Robert. The Analysis of Knowing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, Ernest. “Methodology and Apt Belief,” Synthese 1A (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. “The Coherence of Virtue and the Virtue of Coherence,” Synthese 71 (1985), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen. “Reflective Equilibrium, Analytic Epistemology and the Problem of Cognitive Diversity,” Synthese 74 (1988), 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

John W. Bender

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sosa, E. (1989). Equilibrium in Coherence?. In: Bender, J.W. (eds) The Current State of the Coherence Theory. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2360-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2360-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7563-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2360-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics