Advertisement

Foundations

  • Carolyn Black
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 44)

Abstract

In his recent book, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Laurence BonJour advocates a coherentist view of knowledge and justification, arguing that there is a fatal problem with the purportedly basic beliefs of the foundationalist.1 Barring skepticism, BonJour contends, coherentism is the only even potentially adequate account of empirical knowledge. Keith Lehrer, a long-time committed coherentist, also finds the basic beliefs of the foundationalist wanting: “The problem with the foundation theory is that it does not provide us with any explanation of why we should accept the postulates, when, in fact, it is perfectly clear why we accept those postulates. The reason is that we think that the beliefs in question are very probably true...”2

Keywords

Empirical Knowledge Knowledge Claim Basic Belief Infinite Regress Coherence Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black, Carolyn. “Obvious Knowledge.” Synthese 56 (1983), 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, Carolyn. “Taking.” Theoria 40 (1974), 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BonJour, Laurence. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. Chisholm, Roderick. Theory of Knowledge. 2nd ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. Chisholm, and Robert Swartz eds. Empirical Knowledge. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. Lehrer, Keith. “The Coherence Theory of Knowledge.” Philosophical Topics 14.1 (1986), 5–25.Google Scholar
  7. Moore, G.E. “Proof of an External World.” Proceedings of the British Academy 25 (1939).Google Scholar
  8. Williams, Bernard and Alan Montefiore. British Analytical Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. On Certainty. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright, eds., translated by Denis Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar
  10. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations .G.E.M. Anscombe, tr.. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn Black
    • 1
  1. 1.San Jose State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations