Advertisement

The St. Elizabethan World

  • Joseph Thomas Tolliver
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 44)

Abstract

I take the following to be a platitude about knowledge: there would be no problem of knowledge if everything always had been, were, and always would be just as we believe it to be. In one way or another the problem of knowledge is motivated by of our familiarity with the gap between appearance and reality. So it is an intuition that survives our reflections on knowledge that what we might call “an incorrigible world,” any world ω where for all propositions p, if S believes that p at ω, then p at ω, is a world where one knows to be true everything one believes to be true. One might hope that our best account of the nature of knowledge might explain why this platitude is platitudinous. If not, one would at least hope for the preferred account to be compatible with it. Unfortunately, coherence accounts of knowledge do not fulfill this hope, for they imply that there are some incorrigible worlds that are epistemically inaccessible. I will consider the coherence analysis offered in The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, by Laurence Bonjour as a representative case, showing why that analysis is inconsistent with the above platitude, and suggest why this is general problem for coherence theories. I end by suggesting that a solution to the problem is to abandon the presupposition present in many coherence theories that coherence properties are world-invariant.

Keywords

Belief System World View Justify Belief Coherence Property Coherence Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M.. Belief, Truth, and Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonjour, Laurence. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. Sosa, Ernest. “The Coherence of Virtue and the Virtue of Coherence,” Synthese 64 (1985), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Tolliver, J. T.. “Basing Beliefs on Reasons,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 15 (1982), 149–161.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Thomas Tolliver
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations