Skip to main content

Sampling, evaluation and utilization of animal genetic resources

  • Chapter
Biotic Diversity and Germplasm Preservation, Global Imperatives

Part of the book series: Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research ((BSAR,volume 13))

  • 187 Accesses

Abstract

No program exists in the U.S. to sample, evaluate, and use optimally the genetic diversity present in animals important as food and fiber worldwide. Yet animal products provide U.S. consumers with substantial amounts of essential nutrients. Animals and animal products constitute about 50% of total farm sales in the U.S. Furthermore, all domesticated food and fiber animals now in the U.S. originated in, or were introduced from, other parts of the world. Because the U.S. has a limited sample of animals important as food and fiber worldwide, there is a need to develop a comprehensive program of systematically sampling, evaluating/characterizing, and developing breeding systems to use these resources in an optimal manner. Such an effort could provide the foundation for an organized program of acquiring and maintaining the genetic variation needed in our populations of food and fiber animals to achieve and maintain optimum adaptation to continuing changes in our diverse production-marketing ecosystems. An organized program of animal genetic resources management is needed to provide the framework for a comprehensive program of animal breeding research and development. The development of procedures for movement of animal genetic resources with minimal risk to animal health should receive high priority. The level of genetic diversity needed is greatest and perhaps easiest to maintain for the extensively managed food and fiber animal species (e.g., beef cattle, sheep, goats) because of their variable, dynamic production environments and marketing situations. Continuing optimum adaptation of global genetic stocks to varied production-marketing ecosystems is required for most effective use of U.S. animal production resources and to insure an adequate supply of reasonably priced animal products to meet the nutritive requirements of the U.S. population in the 21st century and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Johnson, A. O. 1978. Food Consumption, Prices and Expenditures. Economics, Statistics and Cooperative Service, U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Econ. Rep. 138, 1977 Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marston, R. M. and B. B. Peterkin. 1980. Pp. 21–25 in Nutrient Content of the National Food Supply. NFR-9, Econ. Stat. Coop. Serv., U.S. Dept. Agric, Nat. Food Rev., Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1982a. Agricultural Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). 1984. Animal Germplasm Preservation and Utilization in Agriculture. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, IA. Rep. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregory, K. E. 1986. Preservation and management of genetic resources: Maintaining adaptation and diversity. Pp. 492–499 in G. E. Dickerson and R. K. Johnson (eds.), Proc. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Management of Genetic Resources, XII. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gregory, K. E., L. V. Cundiff, and R. M. Koch. 1982a. Comparison of crossbreeding systems and breeding stocks used in suckling herds in continental and temperate areas. Proc. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Prod. V: 482–503

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cundiff, L. V., K. E. Gregory, R. M. Koch and G. E. Dickerson. 1986. Genetic diversity among cattle breeds and its use to increase beef production efficiency in a temperate environment. Pp. 271–282 in G. E. Dickerson and R. K. Johnson (eds.), Proc. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production IX. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cundiff, L. V., K. E. Gregory, and R. M. Koch. 1989. Productivity of large sized cattle breeds in beef cow herds in the temperate zones of North America. Proc. 3rd World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding. Paris. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dickerson, G. E. 1977. Crossbreeding evaluation of Finnsheep and some U.S. breeds for market lamb production. No. Cent. Reg. Publ. 246. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hodges, J. 1986. Animal genetic resources in the developing world: goals, strategies, management and current status. Pp. 474–485 in G. E. Dickerson and R. K. Johnson (eds.), Proc. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Management of Genetic Resources XII. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory, K. E., J. C. M. Trail, R. M. Koch, and L. V. Cundiff. 1982b. Heterosis, crossbreeding and composite breed utilization in the tropics. Proc. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production VI: 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hickman, C. G. 1982. Administrative and rational methods of livestock conservation. Proc. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production VI: 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Wen-Chen, J. S. Wu, and W. E. Rempel. 1983. Some performance characteristics of prolific breeds of pigs in China. Livestock Prod. Sci. 10: 59–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, Pei-Lieu. 1983. A highly prolific pig breed of China. The Taihu pig. Pig News and Information. Commonw. Agric. Bur. 4(4): 407–425.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng, Pei-Lieu. 1984. Livestock breeds of China. Chap. 10, pp. 159–194 in Food and Agriculture Organization. Animal Prod. Hlth. Pap. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gianola, D., C. Legault, and J. C. Caritez. 1982. Pp. 39–55 in Evaluation of Chinese swine germplasm in France: Preliminary Results. Proc. Pig Industry Conf. Univ. Illinois, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Howard, A. N. and W. C. Smith. 1976. The Belgian Pietrain as a sire of crossbred pigs slaughtered at 64 kg live weight. 1. Performance and carcass characteristics. Anim. Prod. 23: 389–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard, A. N., W. C Smith, D. Lesser, and E. M. Carpenter. 1976. The Belgian Pietrain as a sire of crossbred pigs slaughtered at 64 kg live weight. 2. Butcher and consumer reactions to meat from the crosses. Anim. Prod. 23: 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, W. C. and C. R. Toft. 1978. A note on the comparative performance of pigs sired by Pietrain x Large White and Large White Boars. Anim. Prod. 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalm, E. 1986. Evaluation and Utilization of Breed Resources: As Sire Lines in Crossbreeding. Pp. 35–44 in G. E. Dickerson and R. K. Johnson (eds.), Proc. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Management of Genetic Resources X. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gol’tsblat, A. I., A. D. Shatskii, and V. M. Vaevodova. 1982. Comparative productivity of Romanov and Finnsheep sheep. Soviet Agric. Sci. 10: 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vesley, J. A. and E. E. Swierstra. 1986. Reproductive parameters of crossbred ewe lambs sired by Romanov, Finnish Landrace, Dorset and Western Range Rams. J. Anim. Sci. 62: 1555–1562.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf, B. T., C. Smith, and D. I. Sales. 1980. Growth and carcass composition in the crossbred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep. Anim. Prod. 31: 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cameron, N. D. and D. J. Drury. 1985. Comparison of terminal sire breeds for growth and carcass traits in crossbred lambs. Anim. Prod. 40: 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kempster, A. J., D. Craston, D. R. Guy and D. W. Jones. 1987. Growth and carcass characteristics of crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds, compared at the same estimated carcass subcutaneous fat proportion. Anim. Prod. 44: 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Craston, D., A. J. Kempster, D. R. Guy and D. W. Jones. 1987. Carcass composition of crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds compared at the same carcass subcutaneous fat proportion. Anim. Prod. 44: 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Latiff, M. G. A. and E. Owen. 1979. Comparison of Texel and Suffolk-sired lambs out of Finnish Landrace x Dorset Horn ewes under grazing conditions. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 93: 235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Latiff, M. G. A. and E. Owen. 1980. A note on the growth performance and carcass composition of Texel- and Suffolk-sired lambs in an intensive feeding system. Anim. Prod. 30: 311–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Alba, J. 1987. Criollo cattle in Latin America. Animal Genetic Resources. Strategies for improved use and conservation. Anim. Prod. Hlth. Pap. 66. Food and Agriculture Organization — United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cartwright, T. C., G. F. Ellis, Jr., W. E. Kruse, and E. K. Crouch. 1964. Hybrid vigor in Brahman-Hereford crosses. TX Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Monogr. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koger, M. 1980. Effective crossbreeding systems utilizing Zebu cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 1215–1220.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Koger, M., F. M. Peacock, W. G. Kirk, and J. R. Crockett. 1975. Heterosis effects on weaning performance of Brahman-Shorthorn calves. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 826–833.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koch, R. M, J. B. Gibb, and J. A. Gosey. 1986. Evaluation of beef cattle industry breeding programs. Pp. 398–409 in G. E. Dickerson and R. K. Johnson (eds.), Proc. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Management of Genetic Resources IX. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dickerson, G. E. 1969. Experimental approaches to utilizing breed resources. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 37: 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gregory, K. E. and L. V. Cundiff. 1980. Crossbreeding in beef cattle: Evaluation of systems. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 1224–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dickerson, G. E. 1973. Inbreeding and heterosis in animals. Pp. 54–77. Proc. of Animal Breeding and Genetics Symp. in Honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush. American Society of Animal Science, Champaign, Illinois. 104 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wright, S. 1922. Effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding on guinea pigs. III. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull. 1121.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson, R. K. 1980. Heterosis and breed effects in swine. No. Centr. Reg. Publ. 262. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hanrahan, J. P. 1982. Selection for increased ovulation rate, litter size and embryo survival. Proc. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Prod. V: 294–309.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hill, W. G. and A. J. Webb. 1982. Genetics of reproduction in the pig. Pp. 541–563 in D. J. A. Cole and G. R. Foxcraft (eds.), Control of Pig Reproduction. Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wolf, B. T. and C. Smith. 1983. Selection for carcass quality. Pp. 493–514 in W. Haresign (ed.), Sheep Production. Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Land, R. B. and D. W. Robinson (eds.). 1985. Genetics of reproduction in sheep. Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Koch, R. M., G. E. Dickerson, L. V. Cundiff, and K. E. Gregory. 1985. Heterosis retained in advanced generations of crosses among Angus and Hereford cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 60: 1117–1132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Young, L. D., G. E. Dickerson, T. S. Chang, and R. Evans. 1986. Heterosis retention in sheep crossbreeding. Pp. 497–508 in G. E. Dickerson and R. K. Johnson (eds.), Proc. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production IX. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  45. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1987. Technologies to. Maintain Biological Diversity, OTA-F-330. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Office International Des Epizooties. 1985. May, 1986 Update. Pp. 401. International Zoo — Sanitary Code 12, Reu de prony 75017. Paris, France. 5th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Singh, E. L. 1987. The disease control potential of embryos. Theriogenol. 27(1): 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McVicar, J. W., E. L. Singh, C. A. Mebus, and W. C. D. Hare. 1986. Embryo transfer as a means of controlling the transmission of viral infections. XIII: Failure to detect foot and mouth disease viral infectivity associated with embryos collected from infected donor cattle. Theriogenol. 26: 595–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Byerly, T. C. 1975. Feed use in beef production. A review. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 921–932.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reid, J. T., O. D. White, R. Anrique, and A. Fortin. 1980. Nutritional energetics of livestock: Some present boundaries of knowledge and future research needs. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 1393–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  51. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1982b. Participation Report. Dairy Herd Improv. Newsl. ARS 58(1). September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Notter, D. R., J. O. Sanders, G. E. Dickerson, G. M. Smith, and T. G. Cartwright. 1979. Simulated efficiency of beef production for a mid-western cow-calf-feedlot management system. III. Crossbreeding systems. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tess, M. W., G. L. Bennett, and G. E. Dickerson. 1983. Simulation of genetic changes in life-cycle efficiency of pork production. J. Anim. Sci. 56: 336–379.

    Google Scholar 

  54. National Cattlemen’s Association. 1982. The Future for Beef. Beef Business Bulletin. National Cattlemen’s Association, March 5.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gregory, K. E. 1982. Breeding and production of beef to optimize production efficiency, retail product percentage and palatability characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 716–726.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fox, A. S. and K. C. Clayton. 1981. Agriculture’s Production Potential. Agricultural — Food Policy Review 4. Perspectives for the 1980’s. Econ. Stat. Serv., U.S. Dept. Agric.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Crittenden, L. B. and J. S. Gavora. 1986. Genetic resistance to virus diseases. Pp. 624–634 in G. E. Dickerson and R. K. Johnson (eds.), Proc. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Genetics of Reproduction, Lactation, Growth, Adaptation, Disease and Parasite Resistance, XI. Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gregory, K.E., Dickerson, G.E. (1989). Sampling, evaluation and utilization of animal genetic resources. In: Knutson, L.V., Stoner, A.K. (eds) Biotic Diversity and Germplasm Preservation, Global Imperatives. Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2333-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2333-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7549-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2333-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics