Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 115))

Abstract

A general consideration of Romanticism and science may start from the premise that all romantic poetics, however they may differ from each other, are metaphors taken from science or nature. The most influential among them describes both the working of the imagination and the structure of poems with metaphors taken from organic life: the imagination, as Coleridge writes in his Biographia Literaria, “reveals itself in the balance or reconciliation of opposite or discordant qualities” (ch. 14: 2, p. 16), and “the rules of the imagination are themselves the very powers of growth and production” (ch. 18: 2, p. 84). Goethe’s similar notion of organicism is characterized by the concepts of type, metamorphosis, polarity, and enhancement [Steigerung]. Novalis deviates from this practice by choosing his metaphors not from organic life but, as Kapitza and Mahoney have shown, from chemistry, and as I have indicated in my book Symbolismus und symbolische Logik, from combinatorial mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M.: Dialektik der Aufklärung, S. Fischer, Frankfurt, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.: ‘The Dialogic Imagination’, Univ. of Texas Press, Austin, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, S.: Biographia Literaria (ed. by J. Engeil and W. J. Bate), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Man, P.: ‘The Rhetoric of Temporality’, in his Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism, 2nd rev. edn., Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1983, pp. 187–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J.: ‘La structure, le signe, et le jeu’, in his L’écriture et la différance, Seuil, Paris, 1967, pp. 409–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, H.: The Rise of Modem Science and the Genesis of Romanticism’, PMLA 97 (1982) pp. 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: Against Method, Verso, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaier, U.: Krumme Regel: Novalis’ Konstruktionslehre des schaffenden Geistes und ihre Tradition, Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, R.: The Fichtean Dynamic of Novalis’ Poetics, Lang, Bern, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapitza, P.: Die frühromantische Theorie der Mischung. Eine Untersuchung über den Zusammenhang von chemischer Wissenschaft und romantischer Philosophie und Dichtungstheorie, Diss. Munich, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn., Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzniar, A.: Delayed Endings. Nonclosure in Novalis and Hölderlin, Univ. of Georgia Press, Athens, Ga., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, H.: Abstraktion und Poesie im Werk des Novalis, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D.: Die Poetisierung der Natur bei Novalis, Bouvier, Bonn, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnár, G. von: Novalis’ Fichte Studies. The Foundations of his Aesthetics, Mouton, The Hague, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnár, G. von: Romantic Vision, Ethical Context. Novalis and Artistic Autonomy, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, J.: ‘Dr. John Brown (1735–1788) and Early German Romanticism’, Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (1967) pp. 367–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, J.: Bifocal Vision. Novalis’ Philosophy of Nature and Disease, Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, J.: Symbolismus und symbolische Logik. Die Idee der Ars Combinatoria in der Entwicklung der modernen Dichtung, Fink, Munich, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novalis, Schriften (ed. by P. Kluckhohn and R. Samuel), 4 vols., 2nd edn., Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 1960–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York, 1959. 1st German edn. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wordsworth, W.: Poetical Works, Oxfort Univ. Press, London, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neubauer, J. (1989). Nature as Construct. In: Amrine, F. (eds) Literature and Science as Modes of Expression. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 115. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2297-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2297-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7531-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2297-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics