Abstract
The logic which governs the present essay takes its orientation from the specific context of its composition and presentation. This context involves an event and a topic: an academic conference held by the Society for Literature and Science, its theme “Literature and Science as Modes of Expression”. At issue here are those questions surrounding what Foucault has called a discursive practice — questions of concept formation and their objects, questions of legitimacy and employment, questions of the speaking subject and its enunciations. In the particular case of this conference all such questions coalesce in a unique way; for here the event of the conference is its topic: what is being asked is the possibility of a new discursive practice or discursive formation ‘between’ those of science and literature, which necessarily implies or even requires that these disciplines be viewed as having a common ground.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bachelard, G.: The Philosophy of No: A Philosophy of the New Scientific Method (trans, by G. Waterston), Orion Press, New York, 1968.
Blair, C.: ‘Nietzsche’s Lecture Notes on Rhetoric’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 16 (1983) pp. 96–129.
Bohm, D. and Peat, D.: Science, Order, and Creativity, Bantam, New York, 1987.
Bruns, G.: Inventions: Writing, Textuality, and Understanding in Literary History, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven and London, 1982.
Buchdahl, G.: Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Blackwell, Oxford, 1969.
Butts, R., ed.: Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.
Cassirer, E.: Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. III (trans, by R. Mannheim), Yale Univ. Press, New Haven and London, 1957.
Deleuze, G.: Cinema 1: The Movement-Image (trans, by H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam), Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1986.
de Man, P.: ‘The Epistemology of Metaphor’, Critical Inquiry 5 (1978) pp. 13–30.
Derrida, J.: Dissemination (trans, by B. Johnson), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981.
Derrida, J.: ‘Economimesis’, Diacritics 11 (1981) pp. 3–25.
Derrida, J.: The Truth in Painting (trans, by G. Bennington and I. Meod), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.
Donato, E.: ‘The Writ of The Eye: Notes on the Relationship of Language to Vision in Critical Theory’, Modern Language Notes 99 (1984) pp. 959–78.
Fekete, J., ed.: The Structural Allegory: Reconstructive Encounters with the New French Thought, Minneapolis, Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Fernandes, S.: Foundations of Objective Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985.
Foucault, M.: The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Tavistock, London, 1970.
Foucault, M.: Archaeology of Knowledge, Tavistock, London, 1972.
Foucault, M.: Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–77 (ed. C. Gordon), Pantheon, New York, 1980.
Gadamer, H. G.: ‘The Philosophical Foundations of the Twentieth Century’, in Philosophical Hermeneutics (trans, by D. Linge), Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1976, pp. 107–29.
Heidegger, M.: Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (trans, by J. Churchill), Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, 1962.
Heidegger, M.: What is a Thing? (trans, by W. Barton and V. Deutsch), Regnery/ Gateway, South Bend, 1967.
Holton, G.: Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought:. Kepler to Einstein, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1973.
Jordanova, L.: Languages of Nature, Free Association Books, London, 1986.
Kant, I.: Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (trans, by V. Dowdell), Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale, 1978.
Kant, I.: Critique of Judgment (trans, by J. Meredith), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1911.
Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason (trans, by N. Smith), St. Martin’s, New York, 1965.
Kant, I.: Logic (trans, by R. Hartman and W. Schwarz), Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1974.
Kant, I.: Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (trans, by J. Ellington), Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1970.
Kuhn, T.: The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977.
Leff, M.: ‘The Topics of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical Theory from Cicero to Boethius’, Rhetorica 1 (1983) pp. 23–44.
Martin, G.: Arithmetic and Combinatorics: Kant and His Contemporaries (trans, by J. Wubnig), Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, 1985.
Martin, G.: Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science (trans, by P. Lucas), Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester, 1955.
Nachelmans, G.: Judgment and Proposition from Descartes to Kant, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
Nancy, J.-L.: L’Imperatif Categorique, Flammarion, Paris, 1983.
Pharies, D.: Charles Peirce and the Linguistic Sign, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 1985.
Schrader, G.: ‘The Status of Teleological Judgment in the Critical Philosophy’, Kant- Studien 45/46 (1953/1954/1955) 204–35.
Smyth, R.: Forms of Intuition: An Historical Introduction to the Transcendental Aesthetic, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague and Boston, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koch, R. (1989). Hypotyposes. In: Amrine, F. (eds) Literature and Science as Modes of Expression. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 115. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2297-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2297-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7531-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2297-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive