Abstract
We saw in the preceding chapter that societal temporailty and spatiality have undergone extreme changes under capitalism. Temporality changed from extensive and cyclical to intensive and linear, while spatiality was transformed from being intensive around small spaces to being extensive around large areas. The purpose of this chapter is to examine these trends along a gender differentiation between men and women. The major arguments to be presented here are that men and women do not necessarily share the same temporality and spatiality; also, that societal transformation of these basic aspects of humanity bear far-reaching consequences with regard to female needs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes to Chapter 4
Firestone, 1970.
E.g. Hartmann, 1976; Markusen, 1981.
Oakley, 1974; Zaretsky, 1976; Mazey and Lee, 1983.
Carlstein, 1982, pp. 403–405.
Boserup, 1970.
ibid., p. 16.
Zaretzky, 1976; Boserup, 1970; Mazey and Lee, 1983; Lowe, 1982, pp. 70–71; Chabaud and Fougeyrollas, 1978.
Toffler, 1981.
On the increased female sphere of activity conencted with urbanization see Wilson, 1979. On the increased separation between production and family life see Mazey and Lee, 1983; Miller, 1983.
See also Sargent, 1983; McDowell, 1983, p. 61.
Kellerman, 1985c.
Though, as Orme (1969) noted, one may identify biological and psychological cycles irrespective of sex, as well.
Mazey and Lee, 1983.
Shahar, 1983, pp. 157–158.
Toffler, 1981.
Cottle, 1976.
ibid., p. 11.
ibid., p. 14.
Rich, 1973.
Cottle, op. cit., p. 79.
ibid., p. 182.
MacKenzie and Rose, 1983, pp. 160–161.
ibid.
ibid.
Ericksen, 1977; Mazey and Lee, 1983.
See Palm and pred, 1974; 1978.
McGee, 1979, pp. 3–4.
Everitt and Cadwallader, 1972; Orleans and Schmidt, 1972; Appelyard, 1970; Pocock, 1976; Spencer and Weetman, 1981; Gilmartin and Patton, 1981.
Matthews, 1984; 1987, and others quoted by him.
Maccoby and Jacklin, 1974.
Sherman, 1978, p. 53.
Gilmartin and Patton, 1984.
Harris, 1978, p. 406.
Gilmartin and Patton, op. cit.; Women and Geography Study Group of the IBG, 1984, pp. 28–29.
Erikson, 1964, pp. 590–591. See also 1968.
On Erikson’s ignoring of the influences of socialization see Lloyd, 1975.
Hopkins, 1980.
Nyborg, 1983.
ibid., p. 122.
Sherman, 1978; Harris, 1978.
McGee, 1979; p. 107; Hart, 1979; Saegert and Hart, 1978.
Saegert and Hart, 1978.
Munroe et al. 1971, p. 21.
For such a list, excluding time and space, see Wekerle et al. 1980, p. 27.
Jackson, 1985, pp. 48–49; Rothblatt et al. 1979, pp. 13, 37; Miller, 1983; Douglas, 1925, p. 85.
Douglas, op. cit., pp. 171–173.
On cities symbolized by men and suburbs symbolized by women see Saegert, 1981. On the female connotation of cities in general see Stimpson et al. 1981.
E.g., Wekerle, 1981.
On the suburbanization of economic activities see Muller, 1981; Kellerman and Krakover, 1986.
Toffler, 1981; Kellerman, 1984.
Naisbitt, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kellerman, A. (1989). Time and Space: Man and Woman. In: Time, Space, and Society: Geographical Societal Perspectives. The GeoJournal Library, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2287-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2287-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7526-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2287-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive